Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2019, Vol. 27 Issue (1) : 128-140     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2019.00128
Regular Articles |
Ubiquitous harm: Moral judgment in the perspective of the theory of dyadic morality
ZHAN Ze,WU Baopei()
Department of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China
Download: PDF(787 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info

The Theory of Dyadic Morality (TDM) suggests that interpersonal harm is a typical cognitive template regarding morality. The moral judgment is a combination of normative violation, negative emotion, and perceived harm. Through dyadic comparison and dyadic completion, moral judgment completes the bottom-up and top-down cognitive processing. Sometimes the moral dumbfounding phenomenon occurs if someone mistakes the perceived harm to the objective harm. The Trolley Problem is interesting but may not be in line with the prevailing moral perception as it strips away the typical cognitive template. We believe that moral judgments in different fields can be explained in the framework of TDM. Future moral judgments research adopting the TDM framework needs to consider the below aspects: seek more evidence supporting that intention and suffering affect moral judgements, conduct cross-cultural studies to generalize the dyadic moral cognitive template, inspect the unified cognitive system and the modular cognitive system dialectically, differentiate interpersonal and non-interpersonal harm, and test other related factors.

Keywords moral judgment      The Theory of Dyadic Morality      cognitive template      moral dumbfounding      The Trolley Problem     
ZTFLH:  B849: C91  
Issue Date: 23 November 2018
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
Baopei WU
Cite this article:   
Ze ZHAN,Baopei WU. Ubiquitous harm: Moral judgment in the perspective of the theory of dyadic morality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 128-140.
URL:     OR
1 段蕾, 莫书亮, 范翠英, 刘华山 . (2012). 道德判断中心理状态和事件因果关系的作用:兼对道德判断双加工过程理论的检验. 心理学报,44(12), 1607-1617.
2 李占星, 朱莉琪 . (2015). 道德情绪判断与归因:发展与影响因素. 心理科学进展,23(6), 990-999.
3 塔西佗 . (1981). 塔西佗《编年史》 (王以铸, 崔妙因译). 北京: 商务印书馆.
4 王鹏, 方平, 姜媛 . (2011). 道德直觉背景下的道德决策:影响因素探究. 心理科学进展,19(4), 573-579.
5 吴宝沛, 张雷 . (2012). 厌恶与道德判断的关系. 心理科学进展,20(2), 309-316.
6 谢熹瑶, 罗跃嘉 . (2009). 道德判断中的情绪因素——从认知神经科学的角度进行探讨. 心理科学进展,17(6), 1250-1256.
7 杨青松 . (2013). 时间距离对道德违规行为判断的影响及其作用机制(博士学位论文). 湖南师范大学.
8 喻丰, 彭凯平, 韩婷婷, 柴方圆, 柏阳 . (2011). 道德困境之困境——情与理的辩争. 心理科学进展,19(11), 1702-1712.
9 张国清 . (2013). 罗尔斯难题: 正义原则的误读与批评. 中国社会科学, 39(10),22-40.
10 张琨, 方平, 姜媛, 于悦, 欧阳恒磊 . (2014). 道德视野下的内疚. 心理科学进展,22(10), 1628-1636.
11 张梦圆, 苑明亮, 寇彧 . (2016). 论西方道德心理研究的新综合取向: 道德基础理论. 北京师范大学学报(社会科学版), 253(1), 50-59.
12 Ames D.L., &Fiske S.T . (2015). Perceived intent motivates people to magnify observed harms. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences, of the United States of America, 112(12), 3599-3605.
pmid: 25733850 url:
13 Atkinson Q.D., & Bourrat P. (2011). Beliefs about god, the afterlife and morality support the role of supernatural policing in human cooperation. Evolution and Human Behavior, 32(1), 41-49.
14 Barrett H. C., Bolyanatz A., Crittenden A. N., Fessler D. M. T., Fitzpatrick S., Gurven M ., et al. Laurence, S. (2016). Small-scale societies exhibit fundamental variation in the role of intentions in moral judgment. Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences of the United States of America, 113(17), 4688-4693.
pmid: 27035959 url:
15 Berniūnas R., Dranseika V., & Sousa P . (2016). Are there different moral domains? Evidence from Mongolia. Asian Journal of Social Psychology, 19(3), 275-282.
16 Bj?rklund F., Haidt J., & Murphy S . (2000). Moral dumbfounding: When intuition finds no reason. Department of Psychology. Lund University.
17 Bleske-rechek A., Nelson L. A., Baker J. P., Remiker M. W., & Brandt S. J . (2010). Evolution and the trolley problem: People save five over one unless the one is young, genetically related, or a romantic partner. Journal of Social, 4(3), 115-127.
18 Bloom P., & Jarudi I. (2006). The Chomsky of morality. Nature, 443(7114), 909-910.
19 Buchtel E. E., Guan Y., Peng Q., Su Y., Sang B., Chen S. X., & Bond M. H . (2015). Immorality east and west: Are immoral behaviors especially harmful, or especially uncivilized?. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(10), 1382-1394.
pmid: 26253486 url:
20 Cameron C. D., Lindquist K. A., & Gray K . (2015). A constructionist review of morality and emotions: No evidence for specific links between moral content and discrete emotions. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 19(4), 371-394.
pmid: 25587050 url:
21 Chakroff A., Dungan J., & Young L . (2013). Harming ourselves and defiling others: What determines a moral domain? Plos One, 8(9), e74434.
pmid: 24040245 url:
22 Chakroff A., Russell P. S., Piazza J., & Young L . (2017). From impure to harmful: Asymmetric expectations about immoral agents. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 69, 201-209.
23 Darwin, C. (1871/1981). The descent of man, and selection in relation to sex. Princeton, NJ: Princeton University Press.
24 DelGaizo A.L., &Falkenbach D.M . (2008). Primary and secondary psychopathic-traits and their relationship to perception and experience of emotion. Personality and Individual Differences, 45(3), 206-212.
25 Descioli P., & Kurzban R. (2009). Mysteries of morality. Cognition, 112(2), 281-299.
26 Duke A.A., & Bègue L. (2015). The drunk utilitarian: Blood alcohol concentration predicts utilitarian responses in moral dilemmas. Cognition, 134, 121-127.
pmid: 25460385 url:
27 Eskine K. J., Kacinik N. A., & Prinz J. J . (2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22(3), 295-299.
pmid: 21307274 url:
28 Fadda R., Parisi M., Ferretti L., Saba G., Foscoliano M., Salvago A., & Doneddu G . (2016). Exploring the role of theory of mind in moral judgment: The case of children with autism spectrum disorder. Frontiers in Psychology, 7, 523.
pmid: 4834434 url:
29 Fehr B., &Russell J.A . (1991). The concept of love viewed from a prototype perspective. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 60(3), 425-438.
30 FeldmanHall O., Dalgleish T., Evans D., Navrady L., Tedeschi E., & Mobbs D . (2016). Moral chivalry: Gender and harm sensitivity predict costly altruism. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7(6), 542-551.
pmid: 27478541 url:
31 Gleichgerrcht E., & Young L. (2013). Low levels of empathic concern predict utilitarian moral judgment. Plos One, 8(4), e60418.
32 Godin G., Conner M., & Sheeran P . (2005). Bridging the intention-behaviour gap: The role of moral norm. British Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 497-512.
pmid: 16368016 url:
33 Graham J., Haidt J., Koleva S., Motyl M., Iyer R., Wojcik S. P., & Ditto P. H . (2013). Moral foundations theory: The pragmatic validity of moral pluralism. Advances in Experimental Social Psychology, 47(12), 55-130.
34 Gray H. M., Gray K., & Wegner D. M . (2007). Dimensions of mind perception. Science, 315(5812), 619.
35 Gray K. . (2012). The power of good intentions: Perceived benevolence soothes pain, increases pleasure, and improves taste. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 3(5), 639-645.
36 Gray K., &Keeney J.E . (2015). Impure or just weird? Scenario sampling bias raises questions about the foundation of morality. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 6(8), 859-868.
37 Gray K., Schein C., & Cameron C. D . (2017). How to think about emotion and morality: Circles, not arrows. Current Opinion in Psychology, 17, 41-46.
pmid: 28950971 url:
38 Gray K., Schein C., & Ward A. F . (2014). The myth of harmless wrongs in moral cognition: Automatic dyadic completion from sin to suffering. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 143(4), 1600-1615.
pmid: 24635184 url:
39 Gray K., Waytz A., & Young L . (2012). The moral dyad: A fundamental template unifying moral judgment. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 206-215.
40 Gray K., &Wegner D.M . (2009). Moral typecasting: Divergent perceptions of moral agents and moral patients. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96(3), 505-520.
pmid: 19254100 url:
41 Gray K., &Wegner D.M . (2010). Blaming god for our pain: Human suffering and the divine mind. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 14(1), 7-16.
pmid: 19926831 url:
42 Gray K., &Wegner D.M . (2011). To escape blame, don't be a hero — Be a victim. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47(2), 516-519.
43 Gray K., Young L., & Waytz A . (2012). Mind perception is the essence of morality. Psychological Inquiry, 23(2), 101-124.
pmid: 22754268 url:
44 Greene J., & Haidt J. (2002). How (and where) does moral judgment work?. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 6(12), 517-523.
45 Greene J. D., Morelli S. A., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L. E., & Cohen J. D . (2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107(3), 1144-1154.
pmid: 2429958 url:
46 Greene J. D., Nystrom L. E., Engell A. D., Darley J. M., & Cohen J. D . (2004). The neural bases of cognitive conflict and control in moral judgment. Neuron, 44(2), 389-400.
pmid: 15473975 url:
47 Guglielmo S., &Malle B.F . (2017). Information- acquisition processes in moral judgments of blame. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(7), 957-971.
pmid: 28903702 url:
48 Haidt J. . (2001). The emotional dog and its rational tail: A social intuitionist approach to moral judgment. Psychological Review, 108(4), 814-834.
49 Haidt J. . (2007). The new synthesis in moral psychology. Science, 316(5827), 998-1002.
50 Haidt J., Graham J. , & Ditto, P. The Volkswagen of moral psychology. Retrieved October 28, 2015, from & Ditto, P. The Volkswagen of moral psychology. Retrieved October 28, 2015, from
51 Haidt J., Mccauley C., & Rozin P . (1994). Individual differences in sensitivity to disgust: A scale sampling seven domains of disgust elicitors. Personality and Individual Differences, 16(5), 701-713.
52 Hamlin J. K., Wynn K., & Bloom P . (2010). 3-month-olds show a negativity bias in their social evaluations. Developmental Science, 13(6), 923-929.
pmid: 2966030 url:
53 Hamlin J. K., Wynn K., Bloom P., & Mahajan N . (2011). How infants and toddlers react to antisocial others. Proceedings of the national academy of sciences of the United States of America, 108(50), 19931-19936.
pmid: 22123953 url:
54 Hofmann W., Wisneski D. C., Brandt M. J., & Skitka L. J . (2014). Morality in everyday life. Science, 345(6202), 1340-1343.
pmid: 25214626 url:
55 Hutcherson C.A., &Gross J.J . (2011). The moral emotions: A social-functionalist account of anger, disgust, and contempt. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 100(4), 719-737.
pmid: 21280963 url:
56 Kawai N., Kubo K., & Kubo-Kawai N . (2014). “Granny dumping”: Acceptability of sacrificing the elderly in a simulated moral dilemma. Japanese Psychological Research, 56(3), 254-262.
57 Laurin K., &Plaks J.E . (2014). Religion and punishment: Opposing influences of orthopraxy and orthodoxy on reactions to unintentional acts. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 5(7), 835-843.
58 Levine E.E., &Schweitzer M.E . (2014). Are liars ethical? On the tension between benevolence and honesty. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 53, 107-117.
59 Levine E.E., &Schweitzer M.E . (2015). Prosocial lies: When deception breeds trust. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 126, 88-106.
60 Margoni F., & Surian L. (2017). Children’s intention-based moral judgments of helping agents. Cognitive Development, 41, 46-64.
61 Marsh A.A., &Cardinale E.M . (2014). When psychopathy impairs moral judgments: Neural responses during judgments about causing fear. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9(1), 3-11.
pmid: 22956667 url:
62 Miller R. M., Hannikainen I. A., & Cushman F. A . (2014). Bad actions or bad outcomes? Differentiating affective contributions to the moral condemnation of harm. Emotion, 14(3), 573-587.
pmid: 24512250 url:
63 Monroe A.E., &Malle B.F . (2017). Two paths to blame: Intentionality directs moral information processing along two distinct tracks. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 146(1), 123-133.
pmid: 28054816 url:
64 Nichols S. . (2002). Norms with feeling: Towards a psychological account of moral judgment. Cognition, 84(2), 221-236.
pmid: 12175573 url:
65 Nobes G., Panagiotaki G., & Bartholomew K. J . (2016). The influence of intention, outcome and question-wording on children's and adults' moral judgments. Cognition, 157, 190-204.
pmid: 27649094 url:
66 Park G., Kappes A., Rho Y ., & Van Bavel, J. J. (2016). At the heart of morality lies neuro-visceral integration: Lower cardiac vagal tone predicts utilitarian moral judgment. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 11(10), 1588-1596.
pmid: 5040918 url:
67 Peter D., Kelly A., & Robert K . (2012). Omissions and byproducts across moral domains. PloS One, 7(10), e46963.
pmid: 23071678 url:
68 Pratt M. W., Golding G., Hunter W., & Sampson R . (2010). Sex differences in adult moral orientations. Journal of Personality, 56(2), 373-391.
69 Rai T.S., &Fiske A.P . (2011). Moral psychology is relationship regulation: Moral motives for unity, hierarchy, equality, and proportionality. Psychological Review, 118(1), 57-75.
pmid: 21244187 url:
70 Rai T.S., &Holyoak K.J . (2010). Moral principles or consumer preferences? Alternative framings of the trolley problem. Cognitive Science, 34(2), 311-321.
pmid: 21564214 url:
71 Rizzo M. T., Cooley S., Elenbaas L., & Killen M . (2018). Young children’s inclusion decisions in moral and social-conventional group norm contexts. Journal of Experimental Child Psychology, 165, 19-36.
pmid: 28645542 url:
72 Royzman E., Atanasov P., Landy J. F., Parks A., & Gepty A . (2014). Cad or mad? Anger (not disgust) as the predominant response to pathogen-free violations of the divinity code. Emotion, 14(5), 892-907.
pmid: 24866519 url:
73 Royzman E. B., Kim K., & Leeman R. F . (2015). The curious tale of Julie and Mark: Unraveling the moral dumbfounding effect. Judgment and Decision Making, 10(4), 296-313.
74 Rozin P., Lowery L., Imada S., & Haidt J . (1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76(4), 574-586.
pmid: 10234846 url:
75 Schein C., & Gray K. (2015). The unifying moral dyad: Liberals and conservatives share the same harm-based moral template. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 41(8), 1147-1163.
pmid: 26091912 url:
76 Schein C., & Gray K. (2016). Moralization and harmification: The dyadic loop explains how the innocuous becomes harmful and wrong. Psychological Inquiry, 27(1), 62-65.
77 Schein C., & Gray K. (2017). The theory of dyadic morality: Reinventing moral judgment by redefining harm. Personality and Social Psychology Review, 22(1), 32-70.
pmid: 28504021 url:
78 Schein C., Ritter R. S., & Gray K . (2016). Harm mediates the disgust-immorality link. Emotion, 16(6), 862-876.
pmid: 27100369 url:
79 Schnall S., Haidt J., Clore G. L., & Jordan A. H . (2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 34(8), 1096-1109.
pmid: 18505801 url:
80 Scott S. E., Inbar Y., & Rozin P . (2016). Evidence for absolute moral opposition to genetically modified food in the United States. Perspectives on Psychological Science, 11(3), 315-324.
pmid: 27217243 url:
81 Shweder R. A., Much, N. C, Mahapatra, M., & Park L . (1997). The "Big Three" of morality (autonomy, community, divinity) and the "Big Three" explanations of suffering. In A. M. Brandt & P. Rozin (Eds.), Morality and health(pp. 119-169). New York: Routledge.
82 Sytsma J., & Machery E. (2012). The two sources of moral standing. Review of Philosophy and Psychology, 3(3), 303-324.
83 Theriault J., Waytz A., Heiphetz L., & Young L . (2017). Examining overlap in behavioral and neural representations of morals, facts, and preferences. Journal of Experimental Psychology General, 146(11), 1586-1605.
pmid: 28805441 url:
84 Tisak M.S., &Jankowski A.M . (1996). Societal rule evaluations: Adolescent offenders' reasoning about moral, conventional, and personal rules. Aggressive Behavior: Official Journal of the International Society for Research on Aggression, 22(3), 195-207.
85 Trivers R.L . (1971). The evolution of reciprocal altruism. The Quarterly Review of Biology, 46(1), 35-57.
86 Wagemans F., Brandt M. J., & Zeelenberg M . (2017). Disgust sensitivity is primarily associated with purity-based moral judgments. Emotion, 18(2), 277-289.
pmid: 28872334 url:
87 van der Toorn J., Nail P. R., Liviatan I., & Jost J. T . (2014). My country, right or wrong: Does activating system justification motivation eliminate the liberal-conservative gap in patriotism?. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 54, 50-60.
88 Welch M., &Bryan J.L . (2000). Moral campaigns, authoritarian aesthetics, and escalation: An examination of flag desecration in the post-Eichman era. Journal of Crime & Justice, 23(1), 25-45.
89 Wisneski D.C., &Skitka L.J . (2017). Moralization through moral shock: Exploring emotional antecedents to moral conviction. Personality and Social Psychology Bulletin, 43(2), 139-150.
pmid: 27872393 url:
90 Wright P. J., Tokunaga R. S., & Bae S . (2014). Pornography consumption and us adults' attitudes toward gay individuals' civil liberties, moral judgments of homosexuality, and support for same-sex marriage: Mediating and moderating factors. Communication Monographs, 81(1), 79-107.
91 Young L., & Tsoi L. (2013). When mental states matter, when they don't, and what that means for morality. Social & Personality Psychology Compass, 7(8), 585-604.
[1] Yu YAN,Tong LI. An analysis of the reverse mechanism how the victim turn into an instigator on workplace incivility[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1307-1318.
[2] Xiaomeng HU,Feng YU,Kaiping PENG. How does culture affect morality? The perspectives of between-culture variations, within-culture variations, and multiculturalism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 2081-2090.
[3] LI Ming-Hui, RAO Li-Lin.  Moral judgment from construal level theory perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1423-1430.
[4] YE Hongyan; ZHANG Fenghua. Embodiment in Moral Judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
[5] WU Bao-Pei;GAO Shu-Ling. Moral Hypocrisy: An Opportunistic Adaptive Strategy[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 926-934.
[6] SHEN Wang-Bing;LIU Chang. Critical Review on Psychological Studies on Moral Hypocrisy[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 745-756.
[7] WU Bao-Pei;CHANG Lei. On the Relationship Between Disgust and Moral Judgment[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 309-316.
[8] YU Feng;PENG Kai-Ping;HAN Ting-Ting;CHAI Fang-Yuan;BAI Yang. Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas: The Conflict between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments[J]. , 2011, 19(11): 1702-1712.
[9] DU Xiao-Xiao; ZHENG Quan-Quan. A Brief Review of the Knobe Effect[J]. , 2010, 18(01): 91-96.
[10] XIE Xi-Yao; LUO Yue-Jia. The Role of Emotion in Moral Judgment: Evidence from Cognitive Neuroscience[J]. , 2009, 17(06): 1250-1256.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech