Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (9) : 1600-1607     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.0600
Regular Articles |
Mechanisms of commission errors in aftereffects of completed intentions
Huan HUANG,Bo LIU,Chenchen ZHOU,Ming JI()
Key Lab for Behavior & Cognitive Neuroscience of Shaanxi Province, Xi’an 710062, China;
Download: PDF(430 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Aftereffects of completed intentions refer to participants continue retrieving intentions interfering with current cognitive tasks, after their failures in deactivating completed or cancelled intentions. Recent studies investigated the related factors and cognitive mechanisms in prospective memory task paradigm. Spontaneous retrieval and preparatory monitoring retrieval diverge in whether the retrieval process depends on attentional resources. Brain imaging research also showed that there are two neural pathways for intention retrieval. Further studies are necessary to explore effective approaches to reduce commission errors, and develop a new paradigm including three aspects of aftereffects of completed intentions, which are failures in intentional forgetting, retrieval of completed intentions and failures in inhibition.

Keywords aftereffects of completed intentions      commission errors      cognitive mechanisms      attentional resources      neural mechanisms     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Corresponding Authors: Ming JI     E-mail: jiming@snnu.edu.cn
Issue Date: 30 July 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Huan HUANG
Bo LIU
Chenchen ZHOU
Ming JI
Cite this article:   
Huan HUANG,Bo LIU,Chenchen ZHOU, et al. Mechanisms of commission errors in aftereffects of completed intentions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1600-1607.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.0600     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I9/1600
  
  
  
比较内容 自发提取-抑制失败 预备性监控
意图后效产生原因 再次提取已完成意图干扰当前任务
旧意图提取方式 自下而上的自发提取 自上而下的预备性监控
是否依赖注意资源 否, 相对自动化 是, 依赖认知资源
生理基础 腹侧额顶网络、内侧颞叶 背侧额顶网络、喙部前额叶
  
1 卢焕华, 王岩, 郭春彦 . ( 2010). 从ERP研究看前瞻记忆的神经基础和认知加工机制. 心理科学进展, 18( 3), 426-431.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/80511A/201003/33120736.html
2 卢家楣, 孙俊才, 刘伟 . ( 2008). 诱发负性情绪时人际情绪调节与个体情绪调节对前瞻记忆的影响. 心理学报, 40( 12), 1258-1265.
url:
3 Anderson, F. T., & Einstein, G. O. ( 2017). The fate of completed intentions. Memory, 25( 4), 467-480.
pmid: 27206804 url: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09658211.2016.1187756
4 Beck S. M., Ruge H., Walser M., & Goschke T. ( 2014). The functional neuroanatomy of spontaneous retrieval and strategic monitoring of delayed intentions. Neuropsychologia, 52, 37-50.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393213003783
5 Bugg, J. M., & Scullin, M. K. ( 2013). Controlling intentions: The surprising ease of stopping after going relative to stopping after never having gone. Psychological Science, 24( 12), 2463-2471.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797613494850
6 Bugg J. M., Scullin M. K., & McDaniel M. A. ( 2013). Strengthening encoding via implementation intention formation increases prospective memory commission errors. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 3), 522-527.
url: http://dx.doi.org/onomic Bulletin
7 Bugg J. M., Scullin M. K., & Rauvola R. S. ( 2016). Forgetting no-longer-relevant prospective memory intentions is (sometimes) harder with age but easier with forgetting practice. Psychology and Aging, 31( 4), 358-369.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/pag0000087
8 Burgess P. W., Dumontheil I., & Gilbert S. J. ( 2007). The gateway hypothesis of rostral prefrontal cortex (area 10) function. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 11( 7), 290-298.
pmid: 17548231 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364661307001283
9 Burgess P. W., Gonen-Yaacovi G., & Volle E. ( 2011). Functional neuroimaging studies of prospective memory: What have we learnt so far? Neuropsychologia, 49( 8), 2246-2257.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393211000765
10 Cohen A.-L., Dixon R. A., & Lindsay D. S. ( 2005). The intention interference effect and aging: Similar magnitude of effects for young and old adults. Applied Cognitive Psychology, 19( 9), 1177-1197.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/%28ISSN%291099-0720
11 Cohen A.-L., Kantner J., Dixon R. A., & Lindsay D. S. ( 2011). The intention interference effect: The difficulty of ignoring what you intend to do. Experimental Psychology, 58( 6), 425-433.
url: https://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/10.1027/1618-3169/a000110
12 Cona G., Bisiacchi P. S., Sartori G., & Scarpazza C. ( 2016). Effects of cue focality on the neural mechanisms of prospective memory: A meta-analysis of neuroimaging studies. Scientific Reports, 6, 25983.
url: http://www.nature.com/articles/srep25983
13 Cona G., Scarpazza C., Sartori G., Moscovitch M., & Bisiacchi P. S. ( 2015). Neural bases of prospective memory: A meta-analysis and the "Attention to Delayed Intention" (AtoDI) model. Neuroscience and Biobehavioral Reviews, 52, 21-37.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0149763415000524
14 Corbetta, M., & Shulman, G. L. ( 2002). Control of goal- directed and stimulus-driven attention in the brain. Nature Reviews Neuroscience, 3( 3), 201-215.
pmid: 11994752 url: http://www.nature.com/articles/nrn755
15 Einstein G. O., McDaniel M. A., Thomas R., Mayfield S., Shank H., Morrisette N., & Breneiser J. ( 2005). Multiple processes in prospective memory retrieval: Factors determining monitoring versus spontaneous retrieval. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 134( 3), 327-342.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0096-3445.134.3.327
16 Friedman, N. P., & Miyake, A. ( 2017). Unity and diversity of executive functions: Individual differences as a window on cognitive structure. Cortex, 86, 186-204.
url: https://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010945216301071
17 Gollwitzer, P. M. ( 1999). Implementation intentions: Strong effects of simple plans. American Psychologist, 54( 7), 493-503.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0003-066X.54.7.493
18 Goschke, T., & Kuhl, J. ( 1993). Representation of intentions: Persisting activation in memory. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 19( 5), 1211-1226.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.19.5.1211
19 Harris, L. M., & Cumming, S. R. ( 2003). An examination of the relationship between anxiety and performance on prospective and retrospective memory tasks. Australian Journal of Psychology, 55( 1), 51-55.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1080/00049530412331312874
20 Leech, R., & Sharp, D. J. ( 2014). The role of the posterior cingulate cortex in cognition and disease. Brain, 137( 1), 12-32.
pmid: 3891440 url: https://academic.oup.com/brain/article-lookup/doi/10.1093/brain/awt162
21 Lustig C., Hasher L., & Zacks R. T. ( 2007). Inhibitory deficit theory: Recent developments in a "new view". In D. S. Gorfein & C. M. MacLeod (Eds.), The place of inhibition in cognition ( pp. 145-162). Washington: American Psychological Association.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/books/11587/008
22 Marsh R. L., Hicks J. L., & Bink M. L. ( 1998). Activation of completed, uncompleted, and partially completed intentions. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 24( 2), 350-361.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.24.2.350
23 McDaniel, M. A., & Einstein, G. O. ( 2011). The neuropsychology of prospective memory in normal aging: A componential approach. Neuropsychologia, 49( 8), 2147-2155.
pmid: 3095717 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0028393210005622
24 McDaniel M. A., LaMontagne P., Beck S. M., Scullin M. K., & Braver T. S. ( 2013). Dissociable neural routes to successful prospective memory. Psychological Science, 24( 9), 1791-1800.
pmid: 4398313 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797613481233
25 McDaniel, M. A., & Scullin, M. K. ( 2010). Implementation intention encoding does not automatize prospective memory responding. Memory & Cognition, 38( 2), 221-232.
pmid: 20173194 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/20173194
26 Moscovitch, M. ( 1994). Memory and working with memory: Evaluation of a component process model and comparisons with other models. In D. L. Schacter & E. Tulving (Eds.), Memory systems (pp. 269-310). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
27 Mullet H. G., Scullin M. K., Hess T. J., Scullin R. B., Arnold K. M., & Einstein G. O. ( 2013). Prospective memory and aging: Evidence for preserved spontaneous retrieval with exact but not related cues. Psychology and Aging, 28( 4), 910-922.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0034347
28 Penningroth, S. L. ( 2011). When does the intention- superiority effect occur? Activation patterns before and after task completion, and moderating variables. Journal of Cognitive Psychology, 23( 1), 140-156.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/20445911.2011.474195
29 Pink, J. E., & Dodson, C. S. ( 2013). Negative prospective memory: Remembering not to perform an action. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 20( 1), 184-190.
pmid: 23132608 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23132608
30 Schaper, P., & Grundgeiger, T. ( 2017). Commission errors in delay-execute prospective memory tasks. Quarterly Journal of Experimental Psychology, 70( 8), 1423-1438.
pmid: 27172855 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1080/17470218.2016.1187182
31 Scullin, M. K., & Bugg, J. M. ( 2013). Failing to forget: Prospective memory commission errors can result from spontaneous retrieval and impaired executive control. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 39( 3), 965-971.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0029198
32 Scullin M. K., Bugg J. M., & McDaniel M. A. ( 2012). Whoops, I did it again: Commission errors in prospective memory. Psychology and Aging, 27( 1), 46-53.
pmid: 22082015 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0026112
33 Scullin M. K., Bugg J. M., McDaniel M. A., & Einstein G. O. ( 2011). Prospective memory and aging: Preserved spontaneous retrieval, but impaired deactivation in older adults. Memory & Cognition, 39( 7), 1232-1240.
url: http://dx.doi.org/y
34 Scullin M. K., Einstein G. O., & McDaniel M. A. ( 2009). Evidence for spontaneous retrieval of suspended but not finished prospective memories. Memory & Cognition, 37( 4), 425-433.
pmid: 19460950 url: http://link.springer.com/article/10.3758/MC.37.4.425
35 Seeley W. W., Menon V., Schatzberg A. F., Keller J., Glover G. H., Kenna H., … Greicius M. D. ( 2007). Dissociable intrinsic connectivity networks for salience processing and executive control. Journal of Neuroscience, 27( 9), 2349-2356.
pmid: 2680293 url: http://www.jneurosci.org/cgi/doi/10.1523/JNEUROSCI.5587-06.2007
36 Shenhav A., Botvinick M. M., & Cohen J. D. ( 2013). The Expected value of control: An integrative theory of anterior cingulate cortex function. Neuron, 79( 2), 217-240.
pmid: 23889930 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0896627313006077
37 Smith, R. E. ( 2003). The cost of remembering to remember in event-based prospective memory: Investigating the capacity demands of delayed intention performance. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 29( 3), 347-361.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0278-7393.29.3.347
38 Walser M., Fischer R., & Goschke T. ( 2012). The failure of deactivating intentions: Aftereffects of completed intentions in the repeated prospective memory cue paradigm. Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 38( 4), 1030-1044.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0027000
39 Walser M., Goschke T., & Fischer R. ( 2014). The difficulty of letting go: Moderators of the deactivation of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 78( 4), 574-583.
pmid: 23934576 url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00426-013-0509-5
40 Walser M., Goschke T., Möschl M., & Fischer R. ( 2017). Intention deactivation: Effects of prospective memory task similarity on aftereffects of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 81( 5), 961-981.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00426-016-0795-9
41 Walser M., Plessow F., Goschke T., & Fischer R. ( 2014). The role of temporal delay and repeated prospective memory cue exposure on the deactivation of completed intentions. Psychological Research, 78( 4), 584-596.
url: http://link.springer.com/10.1007/s00426-013-0510-z
[1] Yifan ZHANG,Xingliang QI,Houde CAI. Neural mechanisms underlying dynamic changes of active maternal behavior in rodents[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1417-1428.
[2] Xiaoqian REN,Xian FANG,Xue SUI,Yan WU. Characteristics and neural mechanisms of handwritten character recognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1174-1185.
[3] LIN Yuting, ZHANG Delong, LIU Ming.  The system of visual imagery generation and its effect factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 636-644.
[4] WU Qian, WANG Yunjia.  Categorical perception of lexical tone and the neural mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 62-71.
[5] JIN Yuchang, DING Meiyue.  Predictive factors and the neurophysiological mechanism of postpartum depression[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1145-1161.
[6] GUO Xiuyan, ZHENG Li, CHENG Xuemei, LIU Yingjie, LI Lin.  The cognitive and neural mechanisms of perception of unfairness and related decision-making process[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 903-911.
[7] MENG Jing; SHEN Lin. Empathy in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Symptoms, theories and neural mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 59-66.
[8] ZHOU Linshu; JIANG Cunmei. Neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the representations of philosophical concepts in music[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 855-862.
[9] ZHANG Wei; ZHANG Zhen; GAO Yu; DUAN Huaping; WU Xingnan. The theoretical models and brain mechanisms of interpersonal trust game during economic decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1780-1791.
[10] YANG Jiemin; ZHANG Shu; YUAN Jiajin; LIU Guangyuan. The Interactive Regulation of Negative Emotions by #br# Anticipation and Cognitive Strategies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1312-1323.
[11] XIAO Xuezhen; WANG Aiping. Theoretical Debate and Brain Mechanisms of Repetition Blindness Effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 182-191.
[12] ZHANG Ying;FENG Tingyong. The Developmental Cognitive Neural Mechanisms of Adolescents’ Risky Decision Making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1139-1148.
[13] PENG Juan;FENG Tingyong. Intervention Program and Neural Mechanisms for Intertemporal Choice in Addicts[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(5): 810-821.
[14] LUO Junlong;ZHANG Entao;YUE Caizhen;TANG Xiaochen;ZHONG Jun;ZHANG Qinglin. Neural Mechanisms of the Belief-bias Effect Based on Dual Process Theories[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 800-807.
[15] HE Xu;GUO Chunyan. Capacity and Resource Allocation of Visual Working Memory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1741-1748.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech