Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (12) : 2260-2271     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02260
Research Method |
An analytical approach to understanding and solving the replication crisis of the embodiment effect
Chuanjun LIU,Jiangqun LIAO()
Department of Psychology, Tsinghua University, Beijing 100084, China
Download: PDF(948 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Recently, previously established embodiment effects (e.g. power pose effects) have partly failed to replicate, calling into question whether embodiment is in fact a true effect. Based on an analysis of the concepts of “conceptualization”, “alternative” and “construction” of embodiment cognition, this present article proposed a way out of the dilemma by specifying four characteristics of this effect: embodied generating level, strength degree, constructing direction and experimental task. Clarifying these four aspects could be helpful to accurately understand the embodiment effect and address the replication crisis. Future studies could conduct by differentiating and synthesizing the embodied generating levels, distinguishing different conditions for embodied strength, discovering the mediating or moderating role of embodied variables, and creating new specific experimental paradigms.

Keywords embodied cognition      replication      generating level      strength degree      constructing direction      online- offline task     
ZTFLH:  B841  
Corresponding Authors: Jiangqun LIAO     E-mail: liaojq@tsinghua.edu.cn
Issue Date: 30 October 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Chuanjun LIU
Jiangqun LIAO
Cite this article:   
Chuanjun LIU,Jiangqun LIAO. An analytical approach to understanding and solving the replication crisis of the embodiment effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(12): 2260-2271.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.02260     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I12/2260
  
1 陈巍 . ( 2014). 可重复性: 盘旋在具身认知实验室上方的“幽灵”. 心理技术与应用, ( 1), 23-25.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_xljsyyy201401006.aspx
2 陈巍, 郭本禹 . ( 2014). 具身-生成的认知科学: 走出“战国时代”. 心理学探新, 34( 2), 111-116.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxtx201402003
3 陈潇, 江琦, 侯敏, 朱梦音 . ( 2014). 具身道德: 道德心理学研究的新取向. 心理发展与教育, 30( 6), 664-672.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/82720X/201406/662935877.html
4 方溦, 葛列众, 甘甜 . ( 2016). 道德具身认知的理论研究. 心理与行为研究, 14( 6), 765-772.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlyxwyj201606008
5 韩冬, 叶浩生 . ( 2014). 重中之“重”——具身视角下重的体验与表征. 心理科学进展, 22( 6), 918-925.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201406004
6 何华容, 丁道群 . ( 2014). 良心的重量: 基于具身视角的内疚情绪与重量感关系的实验研究. 第十七届全国心理学学术会议, 中国北京.
7 黄茜羽, 李宏翰 . ( 2013). 冷暖体验对道德判断的影响. 心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议, 中国南京.
8 胡传鹏, 王非, 过继成思, 宋梦迪, 隋洁, 彭凯平 . ( 2016). 心理学研究中的可重复性问题: 从危机到契机. 心理科学进展, 24( 9), 1504-1518.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/80511A/201609/670104988.html
9 黎晓丹, 杜建政, 叶浩生 . ( 2016). 中国礼文化的具身隐喻效应: 蜷缩的身体使人更卑微. 心理学报, 48( 6), 746-756.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201606014
10 刘亚, 王振宏, 孔风 . ( 2011). 情绪具身观: 情绪研究的新视角. 心理科学进展, 19( 1), 50-59.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201101007
11 刘钊, 丁凤琴 . ( 2016). 大学生道德概念的重量与洁净隐喻. 中国健康心理学杂志, 24( 4), 533-536.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/jkxlxzz201604014
12 栾子烟 . ( 2013). 道德温度:身体冷暖与青少年道德决策(硕士学位论文). 上海:华东师范大学.
13 牛怡然, 鲁忠义 . ( 2013). 道德概念的亮度隐喻表征及其对亮度知觉判断的影响 . 心理学与创新能力提升——第十六届全国心理学学术会议, 中国南京.
14 彭凯平, 喻丰 . ( 2012). 道德的心理物理学现象、机制与意义. 中国社会科学, ( 12), 28-45.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/81908X/201212/44261008.html
15 苏彦捷, 孙芳芳 . ( 2014). 道德具身性的元分析研究. 华东师范大学学报(教育科学版), 32( 2), 88-96.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/86932X/201402/1005645586.html
16 伍秋萍, 冯聪, 陈斌斌 . ( 2011). 具身框架下的社会认知研究述评. 心理科学进展, 19( 3), 336-345.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201103005
17 薛灿灿, 叶浩生 . ( 2011). 具身社会认知: 认知心理学的生态学转向. 心理科学, 34( 5), 1230-1235.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/qk/95682a/201105/39270447.html
18 阎书昌 . ( 2011). 身体洁净与道德. 心理科学进展, 19( 8), 1242-1248.
19 杨继平, 郭秀梅 . ( 2016). 具身视角下道德概念的隐喻研究. 心理学探新, 36( 5), 387-391.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxtx201605001
20 杨继平, 郭秀梅, 王兴超 . ( 2017). 道德概念的隐喻表征——从红白颜色、左右位置和正斜字体的维度. 心理学报, 49( 7), 875-885.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/201707/672895778.html
21 叶浩生 . ( 2010). 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18( 5), 705-710.
22 叶浩生 . ( 2013). 认知与身体: 理论心理学的视角. 心理学报, 45( 4), 481-488.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/90117X/201304/45500651.html
23 殷融, 曲方炳, 叶浩生 . ( 2012). 具身概念表征的研究及理论述评. 心理科学进展, 20( 9), 1372-1381.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201209006
24 殷融, 苏得权, 叶浩生 . ( 2013). 具身认知视角下的概念隐喻理论. 心理科学进展, 21( 2), 220-234.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxdt201302005
25 翟贤亮, 葛鲁嘉 . ( 2017). 从离身到具身: 具身管理学的可能. 心理科学, 40( 1), 238-243.
26 Ackerman J. M., Nocera C. C., & Bargh J. A . ( 2010). Incidental haptic sensations influence social judgments and decisions. Science, 328( 5986), 1712-1715.
pmid: 20576894 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3005631/
27 Andy, C(2008 ). Supersizing the mind: Embodiment, action, and cognitive extension. New York: Oxford University Press.
url: http://muse.jhu.edu/journals/symploke/v018/18.1-2.delancey.pdf
28 Bai Y., Maruskin L. A., Chen S., Gordon A. M., Stellar J. E., McNeil G. D., .. Keltner D . ( 2017). Awe, the diminished self, and collective engagement: Universals and cultural variations in the small self. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 113( 2), 185-209.
pmid: 28481617 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2017-20208-001/
29 Banerjee P., Chatterjee P., & Sinha J . ( 2012). Is it light or dark? Recalling moral behavior changes perception of brightness. Psychological Science, 23( 4), 407-409.
pmid: 22395128 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/22395128
30 Bargh J. A., Chen M., & Burrows L . ( 1996). Automaticity of social behavior: Direct effects of trait construct and stereotype-activation on action. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 71( 2), 230-244.
pmid: 8765481 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/8765481
31 Carney D. R., Cuddy A. J., & Yap A. J . ( 2010). Power posing: Brief nonverbal displays affect neuroendocrine levels and risk tolerance. Psychological Science, 21( 10), 1363-1368.
32 Chapman H. A., Kim D. A., Susskind J. M., & Anderson A. K . ( 2009). In bad taste: Evidence for the oral origins of moral disgust. Science, 323( 5918), 1222-1226.
pmid: 19251631 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19251631
33 Chartrand T. L., Huber J., Shiv B., & Tanner R. J . ( 2008). Nonconscious goals and consumer choice. Journal of Consumer Research, 35( 2), 189-201.
url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/10.1086/588685
34 Day, M.V., &Bobocel, D.R . ( 2013). The weight of a guilty conscience: Subjective body weight as an embodiment of guilt. PLoS One, 8( 7), e69546.
pmid: 3729967 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3729967/
35 Dijksterhuis, Ap, &Nordgren, Loran F . ( 2006). A theory of unconscious thought. Perspectives on Psychological Science: A Journal of the Association for Psychological Science, 1( 2), 95-109.
pmid: 26151465 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26151465
36 Doyen S., Klein O., Pichon C. L., & Cleeremans A . ( 2012). Behavioral priming: It's all in the mind, but whose mind? Plos One, 7( 1), e29081.
pmid: 22279526 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3261136/
37 Eisenberger N. I., Lieberman M. D., & Williams K. D . ( 2003). Does rejection hurt? An fMRI study of social exclusion. Science, 302( 5643), 290-292.
pmid: 14551436 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/14551436
38 Eskine K. J., Kacinik N. A., & Prinz J. J . ( 2011). A bad taste in the mouth: Gustatory disgust influences moral judgment. Psychological Science, 22( 3), 295-299.
pmid: 21307274 url: http://www.europepmc.org/abstract/MED/21307274
39 Eskine K. J., Kacinik N. A., & Webster G. D . ( 2012). The bitter truth about morality: Virtue, not vice, makes a bland beverage taste nice. PLoS One, 7( 7), e41159.
pmid: 3399822 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/articles/PMC3399822/
40 Ferrin, A. ( 2017). Good moral judgment and decision-making without deliberation. Southern Journal of Philosophy, 55( 1), 68-95.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/sjp.12210/full
41 Fischer J., Fischer P., Englich B., Aydin N., & Frey D . ( 2011). Empower my decisions: The effects of power gestures on confirmatory information processing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47( 6), 1146-1154.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103111001697
42 Garrison K. E., Tang D., & Schmeichel B. J . ( 2016). Embodying power: A preregistered replication and extension of the power pose effect. Social Psychological and Personality Science, 7( 7), 623-630.
43 Gilead M., Gal O., Polak M., & Cholow Y . ( 2015). The role of nature and nurture in conceptual metaphors the case of gustatory priming. Social Psychology, 46( 3), 167-173.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2015-25291-005
44 Giner-Sorolla, R., &Chapman, H.A . ( 2017). Beyond Purity. Psychological Science, 28( 1), 80-91.
45 Goldinger S. D., Papesh M. H., Barnhart A. S., Hansen W. A., & Hout M. C . ( 2016). The poverty of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23( 4), 959-978.
pmid: 27282990 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/27282990
46 Greene, J.D. ( 2007). Why are VMPFC patients more utilitarian? A dual-process theory of moral judgment explains. Trends In Cognitive Sciences, 11( 8), 322-323.
pmid: 17625951 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/17625951
47 Greene J. D., Morelli S. A., Lowenberg K., Nystrom L. E., & Cohen J. D . ( 2008). Cognitive load selectively interferes with utilitarian moral judgment. Cognition, 107( 3), 1144-1154.
pmid: 2429958 url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0010027707002752
48 Gronau Q. F., Van Erp S., Heck D. W., Cesario J., Jonas K. J., & Wagenmakers E.-J . ( 2017). A Bayesian model-averaged meta-analysis of the power pose effect with informed and default priors: The case of felt power. Comprehensive Results in Social Psychology, 2( 1), 123-138.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/23743603.2017.1326760
49 Helzer, E.G., &Pizarro, D.A . ( 2011). Dirty liberals! reminders of physical cleanliness influence moral and political attitudes. Psychological Science, 22( 4), 517-522.
pmid: 21421934 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-07884-016
50 Homan P., Ely B. A., Yuan M., Brosch T., Ng J., Trope Y., & Schiller D . ( 2017). Aversive smell associations shape social judgment. Neurobiology of Learning and Memory, 144, 86-95.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S1074742717301090
51 Horberg E. J., Oveis C., Keltner D., & Cohen A. B . ( 2009). Disgust and the moralization of purity. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 97( 6), 963-976.
pmid: 19968413 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19968413
52 IJzerman, H., &Koole, S.L . ( 2011). From perceptual rags to metaphoric riches-bodily, social, and cultural constraints on sociocognitive metaphors: Comment on Landau, Meier, and Keefer (2010). Psychological Bulletin, 137( 2), 355-361.
pmid: 21355634 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2011-03899-004
53 Inbar Y., Pizarro D. A., & Bloom P . ( 2009). Conservatives are more easily disgusted than liberals. Cognition & Emotion, 23( 4), 714-725.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/02699930802110007
54 Inbar Y., Pizarro D. A., Knobe J., & Bloom P . ( 2009). Disgust sensitivity predicts intuitive disapproval of gays. Emotion, 9( 3), 435-439.
pmid: 19485621 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/emo/9/3/435/
55 Johnson D. J., Cheung F., & Donnellan M. B . ( 2014). Does cleanliness influence moral judgments? A direct replication of Schnall, Benton, and Harvey (2008). Social Psychology, 45( 3), 209-215.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2014-20922-011
56 Kang, E., &Lakshmanan, A . ( 2017). Role of executive attention in consumer learning with background music. Journal of Consumer Psychology, 27( 1), 35-48.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1016/j.jcps.2016.03.003/full
57 Kang Y., Williams L. E., Clark M. S., Gray J. R., & Bargh J. A . ( 2011). Physical temperature effects on trust behavior: The role of insula. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 6( 4), 507-515.
pmid: 3150863 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC3150863/
58 Landau M. J., Meier B. P., & Keefer L. A . ( 2010). A metaphor-enriched social cognition. Psychological Bulletin, 136( 6), 1045-1067.
pmid: 20822208 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/20822208/
59 Landy, J.F., &Goodwin, G.P . ( 2015). Does incidental disgust amplify moral judgment? a meta-analytic review of experimental evidence. Perspectives on Psychological Science A Journal of The Association for Psychological Science, 10( 4), 518-536.
pmid: 26177951 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/26177951
60 Lee, S. W.S., &Schwarz, N . ( 2011). Wiping the slate clean: Psychological consequences of physical cleansing. Current Directions in Psychological Science, 20( 5), 307-311.
61 Lee, S. W.S., &Schwarz, N . ( 2012). Bidirectionality, mediation, and moderation of metaphorical effects: The embodiment of social suspicion and fishy smells. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 103( 5), 737-749.
pmid: 22905770 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/103/5/737/
62 Liljenquist K., Zhong C. B., & Galinsky A. D . ( 2010). The smell of virtue: Clean scents promote reciprocity and charity. Psychological Science, 21( 3), 381-383.
pmid: 2042407420 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2010-09431-014
63 Meier B. P., Moeller S. K., Riemer-Peltz M., & Robinson M. D . ( 2012). Sweet taste preferences and experiences predict prosocial inferences, personalities, and behaviors. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 102( 1), 163-174.
pmid: 21875232 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/journals/psp/102/1/163/
64 Meier B. P., Simone S., Norbert S., & Bargh J. A . ( 2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4( 4), 705-716.
65 Montoro P. R., Contreras M. J., Elosúa M. R., & Marmolejoramos F . ( 2015). Cross-modal metaphorical mapping of spoken emotion words onto vertical space. Frontiers in Psychology, 6, 1205.
pmid: 4531208 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4531208/
66 Moore, C., &Barresi, J . ( 2017). The role of second-person information in the development of social understanding. Frontiers in Psychology, 8, 1667.
pmid: 5622194 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28993750
67 Mukherjee S., Kramer T., & Kulow K . ( 2017). The effect of spicy gustatory sensations on variety-seeking. Psychology & Marketing, 34( 8), 786-794.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/mar.21022/pdf
68 Natanzon, M., &Ferguson, M.J . ( 2012). Goal pursuit is grounded: The link between forward movement and achievement. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 1), 379-382.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2011-18114-001
69 Niedenthal, P.M. ( 2007). Embodying emotion. Science, 316( 5827), 1002-1005.
70 Nosek B. A., Hawkins C. B., & Frazier R. S . ( 2011). Implicit social cognition: From measures to mechanisms. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 15( 4), 152-159.
pmid: 3073696 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC3073696/
71 Oosterwijk S., Rotteveel M., Fischer A. H., & Hess U . ( 2009). Embodied emotion concepts: How generating words about pride and disappointment influences posture. European Journal of Social Psychology, 39( 3), 457-466.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/ejsp.584/full
72 Preston, J.L., &Ritter, R.S . ( 2012). Cleanliness and godliness: Mutual association between two kinds of personal purity. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 6), 1365-1368.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103112000960
73 Price, T.F., &Harmon-Jones, E . ( 2015). Embodied emotion: The influence of manipulated facial and bodily states on emotive responses. Wiley Interdisciplinary Reviews-Cognitive Science, 6( 6), 461-473.
pmid: 26401657 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/26401657
74 Ranehill E., Dreber A., Johannesson M., Leiberg S., Sul S., & Weber R. A . ( 2015). Assessing the robustness of power posing: No effect on hormones and risk tolerance in a large sample of men and women. Psychological Science, 26( 5), 653-656.
pmid: 25810452 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2015-21254-011
75 Ritter, R.S., &Preston, J.L . ( 2011). Gross gods and icky atheism: Disgust responses to rejected religious beliefs. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 47( 6), 1225-1230.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103111001454
76 Rotella, K.N., &Richeson, J.A . ( 2013). Body of guilt: Using embodied cognition to mitigate backlash to reminders of personal & ingroup wrongdoing. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 4), 643-650.
77 Rozin P., Haidt J., & Fincher K . ( 2009). Psychology. From oral to moral. Science, 323( 5918), 1179-1180.
pmid: 19251619 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/19251619
78 Rozin P., Lowery L., Imada S., & Haidt J . ( 1999). The CAD triad hypothesis: A mapping between three moral emotions (contempt, anger, disgust) and three moral codes (community, autonomy, divinity). Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 76( 4), 574-586.
pmid: 10234846 url: http://www.europepmc.org/abstract/MED/10234846
79 Schaefer M., Denke C., Heinze H. J., & Rotte M . ( 2014). Rough primes and rough conversations: Evidence for a modality-specific basis to mental metaphors. Social Cognitive and Affective Neuroscience, 9( 11), 1653-1659.
pmid: 4221208 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/med/24097375
80 Schaefer M., Rotte M., Heinze H. J., & Denke C . ( 2015). Dirty deeds and dirty bodies: Embodiment of the Macbeth effect is mapped topographically onto the somatosensory cortex. Scientific Reports, 5, 18051.
pmid: 26686599 url: http://europepmc.org/articles/PMC4685311/
81 Schilbach L., Timmermans B., Reddy V., Costall A., Bente G., Schlicht T., & Vogeley K . ( 2013). Toward a second-person neuroscience. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 36( 4), 393-462.
82 Schnall, S. ( 2017). Disgust as embodied loss aversion. European Review of Social Psychology, 28( 1), 50-94.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10463283.2016.1259844
83 Schnall S., Benton J., & Harvey S . ( 2008). With a clean conscience: Cleanliness reduces the severity of moral judgments. Psychological Science, 19( 12), 1219-1222.
pmid: 19121126 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19121126
84 Schnall S., Haidt J., Clore G. L., & Jordan A. H . ( 2008). Disgust as embodied moral judgment. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 34( 8), 1096-1109.
85 Seidel, A., &Prinz, J . ( 2013). Sound morality: Irritating and icky noises amplify judgments in divergent moral domains. Cognition, 127( 1), 1-5.
pmid: 23318349 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/23318349
86 ShapiroL. ( 2011). Embodied Cognition. London and New York: Rutledge.
87 Sheikh S., Botindari L., & White E . ( 2013). Embodied metaphors and emotions in the moralization of restrained eating practices. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 3), 509-513.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103113000073
88 Sherman, G.D., &Clore, G.L . ( 2009). The color of sin: White and black are perceptual symbols of moral purity and pollution. Psychological Science, 20( 8), 1019-1025.
pmid: 2832478 url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2009-12141-014
89 Skarlicki D. P., Hoegg J., Aquino K., & Nadisic T . ( 2013). Does injustice affect your sense of taste and smell? The mediating role of moral disgust. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 49( 5), 852-859.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103113000644
90 Song H. J., Vonasch A. J., Meier B. P., & Bargh J. A . ( 2012). Brighten up: Smiles facilitate perceptual judgment of facial lightness. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 48( 1), 450-452.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0022103111002460
91 Valdesolo P., Ouyang J., & DeSteno D . ( 2010). The rhythm of joint action: Synchrony promotes cooperative ability. Journal of Experimental Social Psychology, 46( 4), 693-695.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-07243-015
92 Wei W. Q., Lu J. G., Galinsky A. D., Wu H., Gosling S. D., Rentfrow P. J., .. Wang L . ( 2017). Regional ambient temperature is associated with human personality. Nature Human Behaviour, 1( 12), 890-895.
url: http://www.nature.com/articles/s41562-017-0240-0
93 Williams, L.E., &Bargh, J.A . ( 2008). Experiencing physical warmth promotes interpersonal warmth. Science, 322( 5901), 606-607.
pmid: 2737341 url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/20145124
94 Wilson, M. ( 2002). Six views of embodied cognition. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 9( 4), 625-636.
pmid: 12613670 url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/resolve/reference/PMED?id=12613670
95 Wiswede D., MÜnte T. F., Krämer U. M., & RÜsseler J . ( 2009). Embodied emotion modulates neural signature of performance monitoring. Plos One, 4( 6), e5754.
pmid: 2685014 url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/19484132
96 Xu A. J., Zwick R., & Schwarz N . ( 2012). Washing away your (good or bad) luck: Physical cleansing affects risk-taking behavior. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 141( 1), 26-30.
pmid: 21707206 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/21707206/
97 Yan Z. X., Ding D. Q., & Yan L. S . ( 2011). To wash your body, or purify your soul: Physical cleansing would strengthen the sense of high moral character. Psychology, 2( 9), 992-997.
98 Yang Q., Wu X. C., Zhou X. Y., Mead N. L., Vohs K. D., & Baumeister R. F . ( 2013). Diverging effects of clean versus dirty money on attitudes, values, and interpersonal behavior. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 104( 3), 473-489.
pmid: 23127377 url: http://labs.europepmc.org/abstract/MED/23127377
99 Zapatafonseca L., Froese T., Schilbach L., Vogeley K., & Timmermans B . ( 2018). Sensitivity to social contingency in adults with high-functioning autism during computer- mediated embodied interaction. Behavioral Science, 8, 22.
pmid: 29419758 url: http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pubmed/29419758
100 Zestcott C. A., Stone J., & Landau M. J . ( 2017). The role of conscious attention in how weight serves as an embodiment of importance. Personality & Social Psychology Bulletin, 43( 12), 1712-1723.
url: http://europepmc.org/abstract/MED/28914138
101 Zhang, M., &Li, X.P . ( 2012). From physical weight to psychological significance: The contribution of semantic activations. Journal of Consumer Research, 38( 6), 1063-1075.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2012-06770-007
102 Zhong, C.B., &Liljenquist, K . ( 2006). Washing away your sins: Threatened morality and physical cleansing. Science, 313( 5792), 1451-1452.
103 Ziv N., Hoftman M., & Geyer M . ( 2012). Music and moral judgment: The effect of background music on the evaluation of ads promoting unethical behavior. Psychology of Music, 40( 6), 738-760.
url: http://eric.ed.gov/?id=EJ982855
[1] CHEN Lin, TIAN Xiaoming, DUAN Jinyun. The cognitive mechanism of advice taking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(1): 149-159.
[2] LI Heng. Implicit space-time mappings on the front and back axis and their influencing factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
[3] LU Hong, ZHANG Xinyuan, WEI Wenqi, LIU Yi.  The influence of spatial physical order on psychology and behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 560-570.
[4] GAO Zhihua; LU Zhongyi; CUI Xinying. What is the mechanism of negation processes? Introduction and commentary on psychological theories on negation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 413-423.
[5] SUN Bingli; TIAN Yu; SUN Haiyang; WANG Wenzhong. Self: A Perspective from psychological counseling and therapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 83-90.
[6] YE Hongyan; ZHANG Fenghua. Embodiment in Moral Judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
[7] LEE Hui-Min I.; WANG Ruo-Meng; WANG Quan-Hong; QIU Jiang. Handwriting Psychology in the Age of Computers[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1843-1851.
[8] Li Jinxing; Wang Zhenhong. Spatial-temporal Association of Response Codes Effect: Manifestation, Influencing Factors and Its Theories[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 30-40.
[9] HAN Dong;YE Haosheng. Important Embodied in Weight: Weight’s Experience and Representation in Embodiment Perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 918-925.
[10] CHEN Zhaorong;LI Ye. Embodied Social Relationship: Based on the Relational Models Frame[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 702-710.
[11] CHEN Yaping;LI Xiaodong. Infant’s Understanding of Actions: Retrospect and Prospect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(4): 671-678.
[12] ZHANG Entao;FANG Jie;LIN Wenyi;LUO Junlong. Embodied Views of Abstract Concepts Representation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(3): 429-436.
[13] YIN Rong;SU Dequan;YE Haosheng. Conceptual Metaphor Theory: Basing on Theories of Embodied Cognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 220-234.
[14] YIN Rong;QU Fang-Bing;YE Hao-Sheng. Research on Embodied Theories of Conceptual Representation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(9): 1372-1381.
[15] QU Fang-Bing;Yin Rong;Zhong Yuan;YE Hao-Sheng. Motor Perception in Language Comprehension: Perspective from Embodied Cognition[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 834-842.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech