Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (6) : 1131-1140     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01131
Regular Articles |
The analysis of characteristics and internal mechanisms of multisource feedback
ZHANG Yun1,WENG Qingxiong2()
1 School of Business and Administration, Southwestern University of Finance and Economics, Chengdu 611130, China
2 School of Management, University of Science and Technology of China, Hefei 230026, China
Download: PDF(478 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

Although the multisource feedback in foreign enterprises has become mature, it is still underdeveloped in China. Based on extant studies, we discuss and analyze the characteristics and internal mechanism of multisource feedback through three constructs, including appraisal process, rater sources, and ratee. From the perspective of appraisal process, multisource feedback has various objectives, and it often preserves the anonymity of raters as well as managers should pay attention to reasonably using appraisal results. In terms of the rater sources, the level of rating agreement between different raters is low, and raters often make halo error and leniency effect easily. From the view of ratee, the reaction of individuals to the feedback results is impacted by personality, feedback signal, and self-others agreement, etc. Additionally, the studies also show the influence of multisource feedback on performance is unstable. Based on these findings, there is a need for further study on how to enhance the validity and accuracy of appraisal process, improve individuals’ reaction, and summarize the results of multisource feedback.

Keywords multisource feedback      rating agreement      rating biases     
ZTFLH:  B849:C93  
Corresponding Authors: Qingxiong WENG     E-mail: wqx886@ustc.edu.cn
Issue Date: 28 April 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Yun
WENG Qingxiong
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Yun,WENG Qingxiong. The analysis of characteristics and internal mechanisms of multisource feedback[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1131-1140.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.01131     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I6/1131
  
  
  
[1] 刘凤瑜 . ( 2000). 一种有效的效绩评价模式: 360度反馈的基本原理与过程. 南开管理评论, ( 1), 71-74.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_nkglpl200001017.aspx
[2] 陆昌勤, 方俐洛, 凌文辁 . ( 2001). 360度反馈及其在人力资源管理中的效用. 中国管理科学, 9( 3), 74-80.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95764A/200103/5413878.html
[3] 许庆瑞, 王勇, 陈劲 . ( 2002). 绩效评价源与多源评价. 科研管理, 23( 3), 84-89.
url:
[4] Amundsen, S.,& Martinsen, ?. L . ( 2014). Self-other agreement in empowering leadership: Relationships with leader effectiveness and subordinates' job satisfaction and turnover intention. The Leadership Quarterly, 25( 4), 784-800.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1048984314000319
[5] Antonioni, D.,& Park, H.(2001). The relationship between rater affect and three sources of 360-degree feedback ratings. Journal of Management, 27( 4), 479-495.
url: http://www.sciencedirect.com/science/article/pii/S0149206301001040
[6] Atwater,L. E., & Brett, J. F . ( 2005). Antecedents and consequences of reactions to developmental 360° feedback. Journal of Vocational Behavior, 66( 3), 532-548.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001879104000636
[7] Atwater,L. E., & Brett, J. F . ( 2006). 360-degree feedback to leaders: Does it relate to changes in employee attitudes? Group & Organization Management, 31( 5), 578-600.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/247738068_360Degree_Feedback_to_LeadersDoes_it_Relate_to_Changes_in_Employee_Attitudes
[8] Atwater,L. E, Brett, J. F., & Charles, A. C . ( 2007). Multisource feedback: Lessons learned and implications for practice. Human Resource Management, 46( 2), 285-307.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/%28ISSN%291099-050X
[9] Atwater L. E., Wang M., Smither J. W., & Fleenor J. W . ( 2009). Are cultural characteristics associated with the relationship between self and others’ ratings of leadership? Journal of Applied Psychology, 94( 4), 876-886.
pmid: 19594231 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0014561
[10] Beenen G., Pichler S., & Levy P. E . ( 2017). Self-determined feedback seeking: The role of perceived supervisor autonomy support. Human Resource Management, 56( 4), 555-569.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrm.21787/abstract
[11] Bernardin H. J., Tyler C. L., & Villanova P . ( 2009). Rating level and accuracy as a function of rater personality. International Journal of Selection & Assessment, 17( 3), 300-310.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1468-2389.2009.00472.x/full
[12] Bernardin H. J., Konopaske R., & Hagan C. M . ( 2012). A comparison of adverse impact levels based on top-down, multisource, and assessment center data: Promoting diversity and reducing legal challenges. Human Resource Management, 51( 3), 313-341.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm.v51.3
[13] Bernardin H. J., Thomason S., Buckley M. R., & Kane J. S . ( 2016). Rater rating-level bias and accuracy in performance appraisals: The impact of rater personality, performance management competence, and rater accountability. Human Resource Management, 55( 2), 321-340.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm.2016.55.issue-2
[14] Beus J. M., Jarrett S. M., Bergman M. E., & Payne S. C . ( 2012). Perceptual equivalence of psychological climates within groups: When agreement indices do not agree. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85( 3), 454-471.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/joop.2012.85.issue-3
[15] Bono,J. E, & Colbert, A. E . ( 2005). Understanding responses to multi-source feedback: The role of core self-evaluations. Personnel Psychology, 58( 1), 171-203.
url: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/peps/58/1
[16] Bono J. E., Hooper A. C., & Yoon D. J . ( 2012). Impact of rater personality on transformational and transactional leadership ratings. The Leadership Quarterly, 23( 1), 132-145.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1048984311001743
[17] Braddy P. W., Gooty J., Fleenor J. W., & Yammarino F. J . ( 2014). Leader behaviors and career derailment potential: A multi-analytic method examination of rating source and self-other agreement. The Leadership Quarterly, 25( 2), 373-390.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1048984313001021
[18] Brett,J. F., & Atwater, L. E . ( 2001). 360° feedback: Accuracy, reactions, and perceptions of usefulness. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86( 5), 930-942.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0021-9010.86.5.930
[19] Brown, M.,& Benson, J.(2003). Rated to exhaustion? Reactions to performance appraisal processes. Industrial Relations Journal, 34( 1), 67-81.
url: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/irj/34/1
[20] Brown A., Inceoglu I., & Lin Y . ( 2017). Preventing rater biases in 360-degree feedback by forcing choice. Organizational Research Methods, 20( 1), 121-148.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1094428116668036
[21] Brutus, S.,& Derayeh, M.(2002). Multisource assessment programs in organizations: An insider's perspective. Human Resource Development Quarterly, 13( 2), 187-202.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/%28ISSN%291532-1096
[22] Carson, M.(2006). Saying it like it isn't: The pros and cons of 360-degree feedback. Business Horizons, 49( 5), 395-402.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0007681306000206
[23] Chappelow,C. T . ( 2004). 360-degree feedback. In C. D. McCauley & E. van Velsor (Eds.), The center for creative leadership handbook of leadership development (pp. 58-84). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ D. McCauley
[24] Conway J. M., Lombardo K., & Sanders K. C . ( 2001). A meta-analysis of incremental validity and nomological networks for subordinate and peer rating. Human Performance, 14( 4), 267-303.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1207/S15327043HUP1404_1
[25] Culbertson S. S., Henning J. B., & Payne S. C . ( 2013). Performance appraisal satisfaction. Journal of Personnel Psychology, 12( 4), 189-195.
url: http://econtent.hogrefe.com/doi/abs/10.1027/1866-5888/a000096
[26] Eckert R., Ekelund B. Z., Gentry W. A., & Dawson J. F . ( 2010). I don't see me like you see me, but is that a problem? Cultural influences on rating discrepancy in 360-degree feedback instruments. European Journal of Work and Organizational Psychology, 19( 3), 259-278.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/13594320802678414
[27] Facteau,J. D., & Craig, S. B . ( 2001). Are performance appraisal ratings from different rating sources comparable? Journal of Applied Psychology, 86( 2), 215-227.
pmid: 11393435 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0021-9010.86.2.215
[28] Farndale, E.,& Kelliher, C.(2013). Implementing performance appraisal: Exploring the employee experience. Human Resource Management, 52( 6), 879-897.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm.v52.6
[29] Fleenor J. W., Smither J. W., Atwater L. E., Braddy P. W., & Sturm R. E . ( 2010). Self-other rating agreement in leadership: A review. The Leadership Quarterly, 21( 6), 1005-1034.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1048984310001438
[30] Harbi S. A., Thursfield D., & Bright D . ( 2017). Culture, Wasta and perceptions of performance appraisal in Saudi Arabia. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28( 19), 2792-2810.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/09585192.2016.1138987
[31] Hassan, S.,& Rohrbaugh, J.(2009). Incongruity in 360-degree feedback ratings and competing managerial values: Evidence from a public agency setting. International Public Management Journal, 12( 4), 421-449.
url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/10967490903103375
[32] Heslin,P. A., & Latham, G. P . ( 2004). The effect of upward feedback on managerial behavior. Applied Psychology, 53( 1), 23-37.
url: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/apps/53/1
[33] Hoffman B., Lance C. E., Bynum B., & Gentry W. A . ( 2010). Rater source effects are alive and well after all. Personnel Psychology, 63( 1), 119-151.
url: http://blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/peps.2010.63.issue-1
[34] Ikramullah M., Van Prooijen J. W., Lqbal M. Z., & Ul-Hassan F. S . ( 2016). Effectiveness of performance appraisal: Developing a conceptual framework using competing values approach. Personnel Review, 45( 2), 334-352.
url: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/PR-07-2014-0164
[35] Iqbal M. Z., Akbar S., & Budhwar P . ( 2015). Effectiveness of performance appraisal: An integrated framework. International Journal of Management Reviews, 17( 4), 510-533.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/ijmr.12050
[36] Judge,T. A., & Bono, J. E . ( 2001). Relationship of core self-evaluations traits—self-esteem, generalized self-efficacy, locus of control, and emotional stability—with job satisfaction and job performance: A meta-analysis. Journal of Applied Psychology, 86( 1), 80-92.
url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0021-9010.86.1.80
[37] Kampk?tter, P.(2017). Performance appraisals and job satisfaction. The International Journal of Human Resource Management, 28( 5), 750-774.
url: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/09585192.2015.1109538
[38] Karkoulian S., Assaker G., & Hallak R . ( 2016). An empirical study of 360-degree feedback, organizational justice, and firm sustainability . Journal of Business Research, 69( 5), 1862-1867.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0148296315004932
[39] Kim K. Y., Atwater L., Patel P. C., & Smither J. W . ( 2016). Multisource feedback, human capital, and the financial performance of organizations. Journal of Applied Psychology, 101( 11), 1569-1584.
pmid: 27504657 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/apl0000125
[40] Kopperud K. H., Martinsen ?., & Humborstad, S. I. W.(2014). Engaging leaders in the eyes of the beholder: On the relationship between transformational leadership, work engagement, service climate, and self-other agreement. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 21( 1), 29-42.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/256270136_Engaging_leaders_in_the_eyes_of_the_beholder_On_the_relationship_between_transformational_leadership_work_engagement_service_climate_and_self-other_agreement
[41] Kossek E. E., Huang J. L., Piszczek M. M., Fleenor J. W., & Ruderman M . ( 2017). Rating expatriate leader effectiveness in multisource feedback systems: Cultural distance and hierarchical effects. Human Resource Management, 56( 1), 151-172.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1002/hrm.21763/abstract
[42] Krasman, J.(2010). The feedback-seeking personality: Big five and feedback-seeking behavior. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 17( 1), 18-32.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-02929-002
[43] London, M.,& Smither, J. W . ( 1995). Can multi-source feedback change perceptions of goal accomplishment, self-evaluations, and performance-related outcomes? Theory-based applications and directions for research. Personnel Psychology, 48( 4), 803-839.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/peps.1995.48.issue-4
[44] London, M.(2001). The great debate: Should multisource feedback be used for administration or development only? In D. W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck, & A. H. Church (Eds.), The handbook of multisource feedback: The comprehensive resource for designing and implementing MSF processes(pp. 368-385). San Francisco: Jossey-Bass.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ W. Bracken, C. W. Timmreck,
[45] London, M.,& Smither, J. W . ( 2002). Feedback orientation, feedback culture, and the longitudinal performance management process. Human Resource Management Review, 12( 1), 81-100.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1053482201000432
[46] Luffarelli J., Gon?alves D., & Stamatogiannakis A . ( 2016). When feedback interventions backfire: Why higher performance feedback may result in lower self-perceived competence and satisfaction with performance. Human Resource Management, 55( 4), 591-614.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm.2016.55.issue-4
[47] Luthans, F.,& Peterson, S. J . ( 2003). 360-degree feedback with systematic coaching: Empirical analysis suggests a winning combination. Human Resource Management, 42( 3), 243-256.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/%28ISSN%291099-050X
[48] Markham S. E., Smith J. W., Markham I. S., & Braekkan K. F . ( 2014). A new approach to analyzing the Achilles' heel of multisource feedback programs: Can we really trust ratings of leaders at the group level of analysis? The Leadership Quarterly, 25( 6), 1120-1142.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1048984314001064
[49] Markham S. E., Markham I. S., & Smith J. W . ( 2015). At the crux of dyadic leadership: Self-other agreement of leaders and direct reports—Analyzing 360-degree feedback. The Leadership Quarterly, 26( 6), 958-977.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1048984315001162
[50] Markham S. E., Markham I. S., & Smith J. W . ( 2017). A review, analysis, and extension of peer-leader feedback agreement: Contrasting group aggregate agreement vs. self-other agreement using entity analytics and visualization. The Leadership Quarterly, 28( 1), 153-177.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1048984316300868
[51] Maylett, T.(2009). 360-degree feedback revisited: The transition from development to appraisal. Compensation & Benefits Review, 41( 5), 52-59.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/247757150_360degree_feedback_revisited_the_transition_from_development_to_appraisal
[52] McCarthy,A. M., & Garavan, T. N . ( 2007). Understanding acceptance of multisource feedback for management development. Personnel Review, 36( 6), 903-917.
url: https://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/00483480710822427
[53] Mero N. P., Guidice R. M., & Brownlee A. L . ( 2007). Accountability in a performance appraisal context: The effect of audience and form of accounting on rater response and behavior. Journal of Management, 33( 2), 223-252.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2007-05929-005
[54] Mishra, V.,& Roch, S. G . ( 2013). Cultural values and performance appraisal: Assessing the effects of rater self- construal on performance ratings. The Journal of Psychology, 147( 4), 325-344.
pmid: 23885636 url: http://www.tandfonline.com/doi/abs/10.1080/00223980.2012.694377
[55] Ng K. Y., Koh C., Ang S., Kennedy J. C., & Chan K.-Y . ( 2011). Rating leniency and halo in multisource feedback ratings: Testing cultural assumptions of power distance and individualism-collectivism. Journal of Applied Psychology, 96( 5), 1033-1044.
pmid: 21480684 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0023368
[56] O’Neill T. A., Goffin R. D., & Gellatly I. R . ( 2012). The use of random coefficient modeling for understanding and predicting job performance ratings: An application with field data. Organizational Research Methods, 15( 3), 436-462.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/1094428112438699
[57] Pichler, S.(2012). The social context of performance appraisal and appraisal reactions: A meta-analysis. Human Resource Management, 51( 5), 709-732.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm.v51.5
[58] Pulakos,E. D., & O’Leary, R. S . ( 2011). Why is performance management broken? Industrial and Organizational Psychology, 4( 2), 146-164.
url: https://www.cambridge.org/core/product/identifier/S1754942600002601/type/journal_article
[59] Randall, R.,& Sharples, D.(2012). The impact of rater agreeableness and rating context on the evaluation of poor performance. Journal of Occupational and Organizational Psychology, 85( 1), 42-59.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1348/2044-8325.002002
[60] Rogers E., Rogers C. W., & Metlay W . ( 2002). Improving the payoff from 360-degree feedback. Human Resource Planning, 25( 3), 44-54.
url: http://www.questia.com/read/1G1-93463238/improving-the-payoff-from-360-degree-feedback
[61] Rosen C. C., Kacmar K. M., Harris K. J., Gavin M. B., & Hochwarter W. A . ( 2017). Workplace politics and performance appraisal: A two-study, multilevel field investigation. Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 24( 1), 20-38.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/305718494_Workplace_Politics_and_Performance_Appraisal_A_Two-Study_Multilevel_Field_Investigation
[62] Russo S. D., Miraglia M., & Borgogni L . ( 2017). Reducing organizational politics in performance appraisal: The role of coaching leaders for age-diverse employees. Human Resource Management, 56( 5), 769-783.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm.2017.56.issue-5
[63] Semeijn J. H., Van Der Heijden, B. I. J. M.,& Van Der Lee, A.(2014). Multisource ratings of managerial competencies and their predictive value for managerial and organizational effectiveness. Human Resource Management, 53( 5), 773-794.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm.2014.53.issue-5
[64] Shipper F., Hoffman R. C., & Rotondo D. M . ( 2007). Does the 360 feedback process create actionable knowledge equally across cultures? Academy of Management Learning & Education, 6( 1), 33-50.
url: http://www.jstor.org/stable/40214515
[65] Smither,J. W., & Walker, A. G . ( 2004). Are the characteristics of narrative comments related to improvement in multirater feedback ratings over time? Journal of Applied Psychology, 89( 3), 575-581.
pmid: 15161414 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0021-9010.89.3.575
[66] Smither,J. W, London, M., & Reilly, R. R . ( 2005). Does performance improve following multisource feedback? A theoretical model, meta-analysis, and review of empirical findings. Personnel Psychology, 58( 1), 33-66.
url: http://www.blackwell-synergy.com/toc/peps/58/1
[67] Smither J. W., Brett J. F., & Atwater L. E . ( 2008). What do leaders recall about their multisource feedback? Journal of Leadership & Organizational Studies, 14( 3), 202-218.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/250961695_What_Do_Leaders_Recall_About_Their_Multisource_Feedback
[68] Spence,J. R., & Keeping, L. M . ( 2010). The impact of non-performance information on ratings of job performance: A policy-capturing approach. Journal of Organizational Behavior, 31( 4), 587-608.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/record/2010-08125-006
[69] Sumelius J., Bj?rkman I., Ehrnrooth M., M?kel? K., & Smale A . ( 2014). What determines employee perceptions of HRM process features? The case of performance appraisal in MNC subsidiaries. Human Resource Management, 53( 4), 569-592.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm.2014.53.issue-4
[70] Vecchio,P. R., &Anderson, R. J . ( 2009). Agreement in self-other ratings of leader effectiveness: The role of demographics and personality. International Journal of Selection and Assessment, 17( 2), 165-179.
url: http://blackwell-synergy.com/doi/abs/10.1111/ijsa.2009.17.issue-2
[71] Verbos,A. K., Miller, J. S, & Goswami, A.(2014). Employee social cognition and performance evaluation process reactions. Personnel Review, 43( 4), 515-535.
url: http://www.emeraldinsight.com/doi/10.1108/PR-01-2011-0011
[72] Woehr D. J., Sheehan M. K., & Bennett J. W . ( 2005). Assessing measurement equivalence across rating sources: A Multitrait-Multirater approach. Journal of Applied Psychology, 90( 3), 592-600.
pmid: 15910153 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0021-9010.90.3.592
[73] Wong,K. F. E., & Kwong, J. Y. Y . ( 2007). Effects of rater goals on rating patterns: Evidence from an experimental field study. Journal of Applied Psychology, 92( 2), 577-585.
pmid: 17371102 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/0021-9010.92.2.577
[74] Wood D., Harms P., & Vazire S . ( 2010). Perceiver effects as projective tests: What your perceptions of others say about you. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 99( 1), 174-190.
pmid: 20565194 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0019390
[75] Xie J. L., Chen Z. G., & Roy J. P . ( 2006). Cultural and personality determinants of leniency in self-rating among Chinese people. Management & Organization Review, 2( 2), 181-207.
url: http://onlinelibrary.wiley.com/doi/10.1111/j.1740-8784.2006.00043.x/full
[76] Yamazaki, Y.,& Yoon, J.(2016). A cross-national study of fairness in Asia: How perceptions of a lack-of-group bias and transparency in the performance evaluation system relate to job satisfaction. Human Resource Management, 55( 6), 1059-1077.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1002/hrm.2016.55.issue-6
[1] LI Qinglei, WANG Huaiyong. Role overload in organizations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 2046-2056.
[2] LU Xinxin, TU Yidong. To share or not to share: Knowledge sharing in a social dilemma perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(11): 2057-2067.
[3] Yan LIU, Rui LI. Antecedents and outcomes of expatriate proactive behaviors in Chinese MNCs: A challenge-hindrance stressor perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1553-1566.
[4] Changjiang XU,Shi CHEN. The interventions of job crafting: A cultivation of employees’ work initiative[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(8): 1501-1510.
[5] Jianwei ZHANG,Haihong LI,Yuxin LIU,Hui ZHAO. Effects and mechanisms of paternalistic leadership on multilevel creativity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1319-1330.
[6] Yu YAN,Tong LI. An analysis of the reverse mechanism how the victim turn into an instigator on workplace incivility[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1307-1318.
[7] Haiying WEI,Ying WANG,Yaxuan RAN,Yishi ZHANG,Lifang SHU. Effects of service ritual on brand well-being: Based on the interaction ritual chain theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1141-1151.
[8] Jun LIU,Chuanyan QIN. Corporate social responsibility and employee performance: A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1152-1164.
[9] Xiaochen WANG, Xinjie GAO, Panbo GUO. A multi-level integrated model of unethical pro-organizational behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 1111-1120.
[10] . To share or not to share: the study of knowledge sharing in a social dilemma perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 0, (): 0-0.
[11] NI Xudong, HE Shuangshuang.  The regulatory mechanism of the positive and negative effects of subgroup[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 910-921.
[12] LI Fangjun, XIONG Yushuang, LI Bin.  The occurrence of ethical leadership: Antecedents and mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 886-895.
[13] WANG Haiwen, ZHANG Shuhua.  The relationship between emotional labor and job satisfaction: A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 599-613.
[14] ZHANG Yanhong, LI Yongzhou, ZHOU Yong, ZOU Qiong.  The mechanism of newcomer organizational socialization process from perspective of relationship resource[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 584-598.
[15] LI Fangjun, ZHENG Fenfang, YANG Qianyi, WANG Shuman.  The consequential influence of employee voice behavior and its boundary conditions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(4): 710-718.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech