Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (6) : 975-983     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00975
Regular Articles |
Implicit space-time mappings on the front and back axis and their influencing factors
Heng LI()
Department of Humanities, Northumbria University, Newcastle-upon-Tyne, NE18ST, UK
Download: PDF(394 KB)   HTML
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract  

One of the prominent characteristics of human language and cognition is to use the spatial concepts such as “front” and “back” to understand and represent temporal concepts such as the “past” and “future”. However, people’s implicit space-time mappings are not always consistent with explicit space-time mappings in their speech. In recent years, the “Temporal Focus Hypothesis” proposes that sagittal space-time mappings in people’s minds are shaped by their attentional focus, namely, the conceptualizers’ attentions to past, present and future events. A large body of research has shown that many factors related to temporal focus such as cultural attitudes, individual differences and life experiences may influence people’s implicit space-time mappings. These studies not only provide supporting evidence for the “Temporal Focus Hypothesis”, but also reflect the flexibility and malleability of human time cognition system.

Keywords spatial metaphors for time      “Temporal Focus Hypothesis”      cognitive flexibility      embodied cognition      implicit space-time mappings     
ZTFLH:  B842  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: Heng LI     E-mail: leehem168@163.com
Issue Date: 28 April 2018
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
Heng LI
Cite this article:   
Heng LI. Implicit space-time mappings on the front and back axis and their influencing factors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(6): 975-983.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00975     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I6/975
  
[1] 江桂英, 李恒 . ( 2011). 概念隐喻研究在神经科学中的新进展——以心理现实性问题为例. 外语教学与研究, 43( 6), 934-941.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/qk/96946x/201106/40050998.html
[2] 李爱梅, 彭元, 熊冠星 . ( 2015). 孕妇更长计远虑?——怀孕对女性跨期决策偏好的影响. 心理学报, 47( 11), 1360-1370.
url:
[3] 李恒 . ( 2015). 压力感对汉语使用者时间隐喻理解的影响. 现代外语, 38( 6), 770-778.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/82426X/201506/667225991.html
[4] 李恒 . ( 2016). 时空隐喻的心理现实性:手势和手语的视角. 心理科学, 39( 5), 1080-1085.
url:
[5] 李恒, 张积家 . ( 2016). 听觉任务下汉语母语者对不同类型时间句的加工. 心理学报, 48( 6), 617-624.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical/xlxb201606003
[6] 刘馨元, 张志杰 . ( 2016). 不同时间关注点下的空间-时间联合编码效应. 心理科学, 39( 2), 279-284.
url: http://www.cqvip.com/QK/95682A/201602/668250631.html
[7] 叶浩生 . ( 2010). 具身认知: 认知心理学的新取向. 心理科学进展, 18( 5), 705-710.
url: http://d.wanfangdata.com.cn/Periodical_xlxdt201005001.aspx
[8] Barsalou, L. W . ( 1999). Perceptual symbol systems. Behavioral and Brain Sciences, 22( 4), 577-609.
[9] Barsalou, L. W . ( 2016). On staying grounded and avoiding quixotic dead ends. Psychonomic Bulletin & Review, 23( 4), 1122-1142.
pmid: 27112560 url: http://pubmedcentralcanada.ca/pmcc/articles/PMC4974262/
[10] Bender, A., & Beller, S. (2014). Mapping spatial frames of reference onto time: A review of theoretical accounts and empirical findings. Cognition, 132, 342-382.
pmid: 24873738 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027714000560
[11] Boroditsky, L. (2000). Metaphoric structuring: Understanding time through spatial metaphors. Cognition, 75, 1-28.
pmid: 10815775 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027799000736
[12] Boroditsky, L. (2001). Does language shape thought?: Mandarin and English speakers' conceptions of time. Cognitive Psychology, 43( 1), 1-22.
pmid: 11487292 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010028501907480
[13] Boroditsky, L., & Ramscar, M. (2002). The roles of body and mind in abstract thought. Psychological Science, 13( 2), 185-189.
pmid: 11934006 url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1111/1467-9280.00434
[14] Casasanto, D. (2016). Temporal language and temporal thinking may not go hand in hand. In B. Lewandowska- Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Conceptualizations of time( pp. 169- 186). Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[15] Casasanto, D., & Bottini, R. (2014). Mirror reading can reverse the flow of time. Journal of Experimental Psychology: General, 143( 2), 473-479.
pmid: 23773158 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0033297
[16] Casasanto, D., & Jasmin, K. (2012). The hands of time: Temporal gestures in English speakers. Cognitive Linguistics, 23( 4), 643-674.Chen, J. Y., 427-436.
url: http://papers.ssrn.com/sol3/papers.cfm?abstract_id=2173828
[17] Chen, J. Y., & O’Seaghdha, P. G . ( 2013). Do Mandarin and English speakers think about time differently? Review of existing evidence and some new data. Journal of Chinese Linguistics, 41, 338-358.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/258901641_Do_Mandarin_and_English_speakers_think_about_time_differently_Review_of_existing_evidence_and_some_new_data
[18] Cienki, A. J . ( 1998). Metaphoric gestures and some of their relations to verbal metaphoric expressions. In J.-P. Koenig (Ed.), Discourse and cognition: Bridging the gap( pp. 189-204). Stanford, California: Center for the Study of Language and Information.
[19] Clark H. H. ( 1973). Space, time, semantics and the child. In T. E. Moore (Ed.), Cognitive development and acquisition of language (pp. 27-63). New York, NY: Academic Press.
[20] de la Fuente J., Santiago J., Román, A, Dumitrache C., & Casasanto D . ( 2014). When you think about it, your past is in front of you: How culture shapes spatial conceptions of time. Psychological Science, 25, 1682-1690.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797614534695
[21] Duffy, S. E., & Feist, M. I . ( 2014). Individual differences in the interpretation of ambiguous statements about time. Cognitive Linguistics, 25( 1), 29-54.
url: http://118.145.16.217/magsci/article/article?id=22685011
[22] Eikmeier V., Alex-Ruf S., Maienborn C., & Ulrich R . ( 2015). How strongly linked are mental time and space along the left-right axis? Journal of Experimental Psychology: Learning, Memory, and Cognition, 41, 1878-1883.
pmid: 25961360 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/xlm0000129
[23] Evans, V. (2004). The structure of time: Language, meaning, and temporal cognition. Amsterdam: John Benjamins.
[24] Fuhrman O., McCormick K., Chen E., Jiang H. D., Shu D. F., Mao S. M., & Boroditsky L . ( 2011). How linguistic and cultural forces shape conceptions of time: English and Mandarin time in 3D. Cognitive Science, 35, 1305-1328.
pmid: 21884222 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/cogs.2011.35.issue-7
[25] Gibbs R. W.,Jr.( 2017). Metaphor Wars: Conceptual metaphors in human life Cambridge: Cambridge University Press Conceptual metaphors in human life. Cambridge: Cambridge University Press.
[26] Gu Y., Zheng Y. Q., & Swerts M . ( 2016). Which is in front of Chinese people: Past or Future? A study on Chinese people’s space-time mapping. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman, & J. C. Trueswell (Eds.), Proceedings of the 38th annual conference of the cognitive science society(pp. 2603-2608). Austin, TX: Cognitive Science Society.
url: http://dx.doi.org/ is in front of Chinese people: Past or Future? A study on Chinese peoplea??s space-time mapping. In A. Papafragou, D. Grodner, D. Mirman,
[27] Haser, V. (2005). Metaphor, metonymy, and experientialist philosophy: Challenging cognitive semantics. Berlin: Walter de Gruyter.
[28] Hendricks, R. K., & Boroditsky, L. (2017). New space-time metaphors foster new nonlinguistic representations. Topics in Cognitive Science, 9, 800-818.
pmid: 28635107 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/tops.2017.9.issue-3
[29] January, D., & Kako, E. (2007). Re-evaluating evidence for linguistic relativity: Reply to Boroditsky (2001). Cognition, 104, 417-426.
pmid: 16914131 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010027706001582
[30] Ji L. J., Guo T. Y., Zhang Z. Y., & Messervey D . ( 2009). Looking into the past: Cultural differences in perception and representation of past information. Journal of Personality and Social Psychology, 96, 761-769.
pmid: 19309200 url: http://doi.apa.org/getdoi.cfm?doi=10.1037/a0014498
[31] Lakoff G. , & Johnson, M.( 1980) . Metaphors we live by. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[32] Laudau, M. J . ( 2016). Conceptual metaphor in social psychology: The poetics of everyday life. New York, NY: Routledge.
[33] Li, H. (2017). Barbara Lewandowska-tomaszczyk: Conceptualizations of time. Cognitive Linguistics, 28( 2), 361-370.
url: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cogl.ahead-of-print/cog-2016-0122/cog-2016-0122.xml
[34] Li, H., & Cao, Y. (2017). Personal attitudes toward time: The relationship between temporal focus, space-time mappings and real life experiences. Scandinavian Journal of Psychology, 58( 3), 193-198.
pmid: 28266035 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/sjop.2017.58.issue-3
[35] Li, H., & Cao, Y. (2018). The hope of the future: The experience of pregnancy influences women’s implicit space-time mappings. The Journal of Social Psychology, 158, 152-156.
pmid: 28375781 url: https://www.tandfonline.com/doi/full/10.1080/00224545.2017.1297289
[36] McGlone, M. S . ( 2007). What is the explanatory value of a conceptual metaphor?. Language and Communication, 27( 2), 109-126.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0271530906000176
[37] McNeill, D. ( 1992). Hand and mind: What gestures reveal about thought. Chicago: University of Chicago Press.
[38] Meier B. P., Schnall S., Schwarz N., & Bargh J. A . ( 2012). Embodiment in social psychology. Topics in Cognitive Science, 4( 4), 705-716.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/tops.2012.4.issue-4
[39] Miles L. K., Nind L. K., & Macrae C. N . ( 2010). Moving through time. Psychological Science, 21( 2), 222-223.
url: http://journals.sagepub.com/doi/10.1177/0956797609359333
[40] Moore K. E. ( 2014). The spatial language of time. Amsterdam: John Benjamins Press.
[41] Murphy, G. L . ( 1996). On metaphoric representation. Cognition, 60( 2), 173-204.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/0010027796007111
[42] Nú?ez, R., & Cooperrider, K. (2013). The tangle of space and time in human cognition. Trends in Cognitive Sciences, 17( 5), 220-229.
pmid: 23608363 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S1364661313000739
[43] Nú?ez, R. E., & Sweetser, E. (2006). With the future behind them: Convergent evidence from Aymara language and gesture in the crosslinguistic comparison of spatial construals of time. Cognitive Science, 30( 3), 401-450.
pmid: 21702821 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_62
[44] Rinaldi L., Locati F., Parolin L., Bernardi N. F., & Girelli L . ( 2016). Walking on a mental time line: Temporal processing affects step movements along the sagittal space. Cortex, 78, 170-173.
pmid: 27049003 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0010945216300260
[45] Sell, A. J., & Kaschak, M. P . ( 2011). Processing time shifts affects the execution of motor responses. Brain and Language, 117( 1), 39-44.
pmid: 20696469 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0093934X10001306
[46] Shipp A. J., Edwards J. R., & Lambert L. S . ( 2009). Conceptualization and measurement of temporal focus: The subjective experience of the past, present, and future. Organizational Behavior and Human Decision Processes, 110( 1), 1-22.
url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0749597809000405
[47] Sinha C., Sinha V. D. S., & Zinken J . ( 2016). When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Conceptualizations of time( pp. 151-186). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
url: http://journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1866980800001058
[48] Sinha C., Sinha V. D. S., Zinken J., & Sampaio W . ( 2011). When time is not space: The social and linguistic construction of time intervals and temporal event relations in an Amazonian culture. Language and Cognition, 3( 1), 137-169.
url: http://www.journals.cambridge.org/abstract_S1866980800001058
[49] Stocker K., Hartmann M., Martarelli C. S., & Mast F. W . ( 2016). Eye movements reveal mental looking through time. Cognitive Science, 40( 7), 1648-1670.
url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/cogs.2016.40.issue-7
[50] Sullivan, K., & Bui, L. T . ( 2016). With the future coming up behind them: Evidence that time approaches from behind in Vietnamese. Cognitive Linguistics, 27( 2), 205-233.
url: http://www.degruyter.com/view/j/cogl.2016.27.issue-2/cog-2015-0066/cog-2015-0066.xml?format=INT
[51] Torralbo A., Santiago J., & Lupiá?ez J . ( 2006). Flexible conceptual projection of time onto spatial frames of reference. Cognitive Science, 30, 745-757.
pmid: 21702834 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1207/s15516709cog0000_67
[52] Tse, C. S., & Altarriba, J. (2008). Evidence against linguistic relativity in Chinese and English: A case study of spatial and temporal metaphors. Journal of Cognition & Culture, 8( 3), 335-357.
url: http://psycnet.apa.org/psycinfo/2008-15881-008
[53] Walker, E., & Cooperrider, K. (2016). The Continuity of metaphor: Evidence from temporal gestures. Cognitive Science, 40, 481-495.
pmid: 26059310 url: http://doi.wiley.com/10.1111/cogs.2016.40.issue-2
[54] Walker, E. J., & Nú?ez, R. (2017). Speaking, gesturing, reasoning: Methods and issues in the study. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Conceptualization of time(pp. 67-84). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
[55] Waliński, J. T . ( 2016). Reflection of temporal horizon in linguistic performance. In B. Lewandowska-Tomaszczyk (Ed.), Conceptualization of time(pp. 273-293). Amsterdam/ Philadelphia, PA: John Benjamins.
url: http://www.researchgate.net/publication/303953739_Reflection_of_temporal_horizon_in_linguistic_performance
[56] Walker E. J., Bergen B. K., & Nú?ez R . ( 2017). The spatial alignment of time: Differences in alignment of deictic and sequence time along the sagittal and lateral axes. Acta Psychologica, 175, 13-20.
pmid: 28259726 url: http://linkinghub.elsevier.com/retrieve/pii/S0001691816302803
[57] Whorf B. L. (2000). The relation of habitual thought and behavior to language. In J. B. Carroll (Ed.), Language, thought, and reality: Selected writings of Benjamin Lee Whorf (pp. 134-159). Cambridge, MA: MIT Press.
[1] LU Hong, ZHANG Xinyuan, WEI Wenqi, LIU Yi.  The influence of spatial physical order on psychology and behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 560-570.
[2] GAO Zhihua; LU Zhongyi; CUI Xinying. What is the mechanism of negation processes? Introduction and commentary on psychological theories on negation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 413-423.
[3] CHEN Jie, LIU Lei, WANG Rong, SHEN Haizhou.  The effect of musical training on executive functions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(11): 1854-1864.
[4] SUN Bingli; TIAN Yu; SUN Haiyang; WANG Wenzhong. Self: A Perspective from psychological counseling and therapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 83-90.
[5] YE Hongyan; ZHANG Fenghua. Embodiment in Moral Judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
[6] LEE Hui-Min I.; WANG Ruo-Meng; WANG Quan-Hong; QIU Jiang. Handwriting Psychology in the Age of Computers[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1843-1851.
[7] Li Jinxing; Wang Zhenhong. Spatial-temporal Association of Response Codes Effect: Manifestation, Influencing Factors and Its Theories[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 30-40.
[8] HAN Dong;YE Haosheng. Important Embodied in Weight: Weight’s Experience and Representation in Embodiment Perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 918-925.
[9] CHEN Zhaorong;LI Ye. Embodied Social Relationship: Based on the Relational Models Frame[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 702-710.
[10] CHEN Yaping;LI Xiaodong. Infant’s Understanding of Actions: Retrospect and Prospect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(4): 671-678.
[11] ZHANG Entao;FANG Jie;LIN Wenyi;LUO Junlong. Embodied Views of Abstract Concepts Representation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(3): 429-436.
[12] YIN Rong;SU Dequan;YE Haosheng. Conceptual Metaphor Theory: Basing on Theories of Embodied Cognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 220-234.
[13] YIN Rong;QU Fang-Bing;YE Hao-Sheng. Research on Embodied Theories of Conceptual Representation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(9): 1372-1381.
[14] QU Fang-Bing;Yin Rong;Zhong Yuan;YE Hao-Sheng. Motor Perception in Language Comprehension: Perspective from Embodied Cognition[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 834-842.
[15] YIN Rong;QU Fang-Bing;YE Hao-Sheng. ‘Good Right and Bad Left’ or ‘Good Left and Bad Right’: The Relation Between Handedness and Space Affective Valence[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(12): 1971-1979.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech