Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (3) : 549-559     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00549
Regular Articles |
 Political orientation and its changing mechanism
 LI Wenqi; ZHANG Mengyuan; KOU Yu
 (Beijing Key Laboratory of Applied Experimental Psychology; National Demonstration Center for Experimental Psychology Education (Beijing Normal University); Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
Download: PDF(476 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Abstract   Political orientation refers to people’s ideological self-positioning and can be divided into liberalism and conservatism. Individuals with different political orientations exhibit significant differences in cognitive and behavioral characteristics. Although individuals’ political orientation is relatively stable, it may change under threat. Motivated social cognition theory postulates that threat makes people more conservative. Terror management theory proposes that threat makes people more firmly believe in their original cultural worldviews, and thus makes their political orientation more pronounced. This suggests that threat will cause liberals to be more liberal and conservatives to be more conservative. Based on deep analysis and discussion of relevant theories and empirical studies, we point out that failing to distinguish between external threat and internal threat may explain why these two theories are contradictory. We propose that internal threat can reinforce individuals’ original political orientation, while external threat makes people more conservative. Future research should endeavor to explore the mechanism underlying how external and internal threat affect political orientation, this phenomenon in Chinese context, and how to promote harmonious relationship between people with different political orientations.
Keywords political orientation      threat      motivated social cognition theory      terror management theory     
Corresponding Authors: KOU Yu, E-mail:     E-mail: E-mail:
Issue Date: 31 January 2018
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
LI Wenqi
ZHANG Mengyuan
Cite this article:   
LI Wenqi,ZHANG Mengyuan,KOU Yu.  Political orientation and its changing mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 549-559.
URL:     OR
[1] YANG Ziyan; LUO Yu; GU Ruolei; LIU Yunzhi; CAI Huajian. Self-esteem and brain: A social neuroscience approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 788-798.
[2] LU Kexin; SHEN Kehan; LI Hong. The role of emotion in terror management theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 76-85.
[3] ZHENG Xiaoying; PENG Siqing. Consumption as Psychological Compensation: A Review of Compensatory Consumption[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(9): 1513-1520.
[4] ZHANG Yu;LUO Yu;ZHAO Shouying;CHEN Wei;LI Hong. Attentional Bias towards Threat: Facilitated Attentional Orienting or Impaired Attentional Disengagement?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1129-1138.
[5] DANG Baobao;GAO Chenghai;YANG Yang;WAN Minggang. Intergroup Threat: The Contributing Factors and Reduction Strategies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 711-720.
[6] LI Xiaoxin; GUO Yongyu; MI Jing; HU Xiaoyong. The Concept and Measurements of Threat Sensitivity: Physiological and Cognitive Approaches[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1608-1615.
[7] LI Yang;ZHANG Liwei;ZHANG Liancheng. The Theory of Challenge and Threat States in Athletes and Self-Control in Competition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(9): 1696-1710.
[8] HE Qingli;YU Lin;MA Jianling. Review and Prospect of Aging Stereotype[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(3): 495-505.
[9] DU Lei. Brain Mechanisms of Threatening Information Detection[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 243-251.
[10] LIU Hongyan;HU Zhiguo. The Facial Expression Processing in Social Anxiety Disorder[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(11): 1927-1938.
[11] ZHOU Chunyan;GUO Yongyu. Belief in A Just World: A Double-edged Sword for Justice Restoration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(1): 144-154.
[12] GAO Bing. A Review of Study on Stereotype Threat Effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(8): 1201-1206.
[13] LI Qiong;HUANG Xi-Ting;YIN Ke-LI. Positive Effect of Positive Psychological Factors to the coping of Chronic Life-threatening Illnesses: Evidence, Controversies and Suggestion[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(10): 1663-1671.
[14] CHENG Su;LIU Lu;ZHENG Yong. Research Paradigms and Theoretical Models of Social Exclusion[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 905-915.
[15] LIU Li;YANG Xiao-Li. Psychosocial Underpinnings of Ethnic Conflict in China[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 803-808.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech