Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2018, Vol. 26 Issue (1) : 14-25     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00014
Conceptual Framework |
 Research on the impact mechanism of TMT cognition on organizational ambidexterity: From organizational character perspective
 FU Yue
 (School of Management, Xiamen University, Xiamen 361000, China)
Download: PDF(521 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks     Supporting Info
Guide   
Abstract   It is not surprising that some famous companies may fail. Today's success may turn to be tomorrow’s failure. Therefore, companies should not only be good at learning from experience, but also focus on the future plans. A model of organizational ambidexterity based on Top Management Team (TMT)’s cognition is expected to help companies to balance these two demands. TMT’s cognition on organizational character reflects team members¢ general ideas about the past, present and future of their organization. The impact of TMT’s cognitive congruence/differences in organizational character on organizational ambidexterity, as well as the mediating role of TMT behavioral integration is examined. In addition, the relationship between organizational ambidexterity and organizational performance, as well as the moderating role of industry dynamics is explored. The results may deepen our understanding of TMT cognition and enrich the organizational ambidexterity theory. Finally, the improved Organizational Character Index (OCI) provides reliable tool and method for future research.
Keywords TMT cognition      organizational character      behavioral integration      organizational ambidexterity      organizational performance     
ZTFLH:     
  B849:C93  
Fund: 
Corresponding Authors: FU Yue, E-mail: fuyue@xmu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 28 November 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
FU Yue
Cite this article:   
FU Yue.  Research on the impact mechanism of TMT cognition on organizational ambidexterity: From organizational character perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(1): 14-25.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00014     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2018/V26/I1/14
[1] MENG Zhu, YAN Guoli.  Mechanism of the irrelevant speech effect in reading: Is the interference determined by content, or process?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 262-269.
[2] ZHOU Shegang, ZHANG Xiaoyuan.  Selecting the best treatment: Client-treatment match[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 294-305.
[3] ZHANG Lvyi, HUANG Qing, JIANG Yunjie, JIANG Chunyan.  Counterproductive work behavior: Research perspective, content and design[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 306-318.
[4] LIU Xiaoguang, WANG Zhihao.  Influence mechanism of managerial pro-social rule breaking on employee behavior from the perspective of opposition between favor and reason: A cross-levels and longitudinal study[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 191-203.
[5] LV Hongjiang, HAN Chengxuan, WANG Daojin.  The relationship between emotional intelligence and leadership effectiveness: A meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 204-220.
[6] ZHANG Hui, MA Hong-yu, XU Fu-ming, LIU Yanjun, Shi Yan-wei.  Fairness preferences in the Ultimate Game: A dual-system theory perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 319-330.
[7] XU Zhan-Fei, XI Ju-Zhe.  Attitudinal ambivalence: Origins and coping strategies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 331-343.
[8] NIE Xugang, CHEN Ping, ZHANG Yingbin, HE Yinhong.  Item Position Effect: Conceptualization, detection and developments[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 368-380.
[9] YU Mingyang, LI Fuhong, CAO Bihua.  The advantage in recognition of happy faces and its cognitive neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 254-261.
[10] ZHANG Hengchao.  Cognitive characteristics of communication language[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 270-282.
[11] YU Wenyuan, LIU Ye, FU Xiaolan.  Two kinds of action representation in manipulable object recognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 229-240.
[12] CHENG Nanhua, LI Zhanxing, ZHU Liqi.  Children’s understanding of social power and its relationship with social behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 283-293.
[13] WANG Xiaozhuang, WANG Sicong, MU Weili, ZHANG Jiane, YIN Wenchao.  Correlation heuristic of accumulation judgment in dynamic systems[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 344-357.
[14] SHANG Junchen, CHEN Wenfeng, JI Luyan.  The role of facial attractiveness in cognitive process and its neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 241-253.
[15] MAO Xiuzhen, XIA Menglian, XIN Tao.  Full-information item bifactor analysis: Model, parameter estimation and application[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 358-367.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech