Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2017, Vol. 25 Issue (5) : 723-730     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00723
Conceptual Framework |
The influence of critical thinking on Chinese innovative concept and behavior
HOU Yubo
(School of Psychological and Cognitive Sciences and Beijing Key Laboratory of Behavior and Mental Health, Peking University, Beijing 100871, China)
Download: PDF(492 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Critical thinking is the process of value assessment and reflection on the basis of reasonable judgment and appropriate criteria. Despite its short history in psychological research, the exploration of this concept began with Descartes in the age of enlightenment. Descartes held the view that most of human knowledge is constructed on erred bases. Hence, in the pursuit of truth, the best method is to first cast doubt on all concepts and knowledge at hand. The doubt helps to discover and solve problems, and in the process knowledge is advanced and certainty is obtained. This kind of doubting is precisely the essence of critical thinking. Since 1980s, Ennis and Facione have studied the characteristics of Westerners’ critical thinking using modern psychological methods. They suggested that critical thinking could be measured along three dimensions: analytical ability, openness, and application. The current research is comprised of four parts. First, we determined the structures and effects of critical thinking in Chinese. Second, we explored the relation between critical thinking and creativity in college students. Third, we explored the relation between critical thinking and innovation in employees. Forth, we studied how to improve Chinese innovation by manipulating critical thinking. By systematically examining the relation between critical thinking and innovation, this line of research will help us better understand the mechanisms and effects of critical thinking and provide theoretical support for the mass innovation initiative proposed at the Eighteenth National Congress of the CPC.

Keywords critical thinking      analytical ability      openness of thinking      innovation      culture     
Corresponding Authors: HOU Yubo, E-mail: houyubo@pku.edu.cn    
Issue Date: 15 May 2017
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HOU Yubo
Cite this article:   
HOU Yubo. The influence of critical thinking on Chinese innovative concept and behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 723-730.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00723     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2017/V25/I5/723
[1] WANG Xinjian, ZHANG Huijuan, WU Di, LV Xiaokang.  Cultural influences on individual risk perception: Cultural cognition theory’s explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1251-1260.
[2] MAMAT Marhaba, LI Ye, WANG Hui.  Narcissistic leader versus humble leader: A perspective from cross-culture management[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1375-1386.
[3] CHEN Chen, YANG Fu, LI Yongqiang.  Workplace ostracism: A review on mechanisms and localization development[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1387-1400.
[4] MAMAT Marhaba, WU Yanhong.  The dynamic characteristic of self-construal: A polycultural perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1229-1239.
[5] PENG Luluo, ZHENG Xiaoying, PENG Siqing.  The status quo of culture mixing research and its future directions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1240-1250.
[6] GUO Xucheng, MA Hongyu, JIANG Hai, YUAN Ming.  Work-family interaction in the context of individualism-collectivism culture[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1036-1044.
[7] HUANG Yun; CHENG Liang; QU Yili; ZHAO Qingbai; ZHOU Zhijin. Animal innovation: The simplest flash of intelligence[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 799-809.
[8] LU Jun; CHEN Hao; YUE Guoan. Tight-loose culture: A new dimension of cross-cultural psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 887-902.
[9] GONG Zhe; LIU Chang; SHEN Wangbing; WANG Xian; SHI Rong. The impact of trust on creativity: Activation, inhibition and inverted U model hypothesis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 463-474.
[10] LI Kai; GUO Yongyu; YANG Shenlong. Public risk perception of terror attacks[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 358-369.
[11] YANG Wen-Jing; JIN Yu-Le; CHEN Qun-Lin; SUN Jiang-Zhou; TONG Dan-Dan; . The creative components and neural mechanism of prototype heuristics in scientific innovation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1139-1146.
[12] WEI Xuhua. A meta-analysis of the effects of pay level and pay dispersion on firm operational outcomes[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1020-1031.
[13] LI Yan; YANG Baiyin. Idea implementation: The trend of innovation research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 643-653.
[14] ZHANG Zhi-Xue; SHI Junqi; LIU Jun. Advances and frontiers in research of organizational behavior and leadership[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 317-326.
[15] MA Xinran; REN Xiaopeng; XU Jiang. The difference of collectivism between north and south China and its cultural dynamics[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1551-1555.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech