Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2017, Vol. 25 Issue (3) : 500-510     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00500
Regular Articles |
Understanding emotional labor from a contingent perspective: A review on moderating variables and mechanisms
LIAO Huahua1,2; YAN Aimin2
(1 Department of Economics and Management, Changsha University, Changsha, 410022, China) (2 School of Business, Central South University, Changsha, 410083, China)
Download: PDF(353 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Exploration of moderators has been one of the major theoretical focus of emotional labor literature in recent years. Our review on the empirical studies indicated that a great variety of variables in three aspects—individual difference, job context and culture—had significant moderating effects on the effects of emotional labor. By taking a contingent perspective on emotional labor, we found that: (I) the display rules at organizational, industrial and cultural levels could exert different yet related influence on individual emotion expression in workplace; (II) the potential detrimental effect of surface acting could be possibly buffered, eradicated or even turned into positive one by means of either individual internal mechanism or organizational management intervention; (III) deep acting had a positive effect consistently across individuals and contexts; (IV) cultural context functioned as an important boundary condition for emotional labor process. It was revealed that both emotional labor requirements and regulation behaviors could possibly bring benefits to employees.

Keywords emotional labor      display rule      deep acting      surface acting      boundary condition     
Corresponding Authors: YAN Aimin, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 15 March 2017
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
LIAO Huahua
YAN Aimin
Cite this article:   
LIAO Huahua,YAN Aimin. Understanding emotional labor from a contingent perspective: A review on moderating variables and mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 500-510.
URL:     OR
[1] XIE Heping; WANG Fuxing; WANG Yuxin; An Jing. Does Harder-to-Read mean Better-to-Learn? Effects of Disfluency on Learning Outcomes[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1077-1090.
[2] SUN Jianmin; WANG Honglei. The potential mechanisms involved in the negative effect of high performance work system[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1091-1106.
[3] WANG Fuxing; XIE Heping; LI Hui. Visual text or narration? Meta-analysis of the modality effect in multimedia learning[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 335-350.
[4] WANG Zhen; XU Haoying; DU Chenduo. The Trickle-Down Effect in Leadership Research: A Review and Prospect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 1079-1094.
[5] LIAO Huahua; YAN Aimin. The Effects, Moderators and Mechanism of Emotional Labor[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(9): 1504-1512.
[6] WEI Cheng-Yao;ZHAO Dong-Mei. The Researches of Cross-cultural expression and Recognition on Facial Expression[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(10): 1614-1622.
[7] Shi Bing, Su Yanjie. The Development and Related Factors of Children’s Emotional Masking[J]. , 2005, 13(02): 162-168.
[8] Sun Juncai, Qiao Jianzhong. A Review of Research on Emotional Work[J]. , 2005, 13(01): 85-90.
[9] Hou Ruihe,Yu Guoliang,Lin Chongde. Children’s Cognitive Development of Emotional Display Rules[J]. , 2004, 12(03): 387-394.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech