Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (9) : 1457-1466     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01457
Regular Articles |
The role leaders’ perception to employee voice behavior motives: An attribution theory-based review
YAN Yu; HE Yanan
(Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
Download: PDF(465 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Based on attribution theory, this paper reviews leaders’ perception of employee voice-behavior motives to explain the different leader responses to employee voice behaviors. We propose when leaders believe employees' voice behaviors are driven by either organizational-concern motive or prosocial-values motive, they will have positive responses; such as praise/ acceptance, rewards, and task execution. Alternately, negative responses such as punishment, neglect, and revenge will result when leaders attribute employees' voice behaviors to a challenge motive, disengagement motive, impression management or self-protection. Further, we argue that power distance will moderate the relationship between leaders’ motive perception and employees’ voice behaviors. Specifically, leaders of low power distance are more likely to support and accept voice behaviors exhibiting stronger relationships between expertise and voice climate with positive motive perceptions; while a weaker relationship is seen between challenge motive and negative motive perceptions. On the other hand, leaders of high power distance tend to assert absolute authority and control over subordinates, and exhibit weaker relationships between expertise, creditability, and voice climate with positive motive perceptions; and a stronger relationship between challenge voice and negative motive perceptions. Finally, we suggest future research focus on the following areas: 1) examine voice as a process to examine the process whereby leaders’ responses to voice behaviors can affect employees’ subsequent attitudes and behaviors; 2) explore how a voice climate develops and examine its effects at the individual and organizational levels; 3) clarify on the role of emotions in voice behaviors.

Keywords voice      leadership      motive perception      power distance      attribution theory     
Corresponding Authors: YAN Yu, E-mail: yanyu@whu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 15 September 2016
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YAN Yu
HE Yanan
Cite this article:   
YAN Yu,HE Yanan. The role leaders’ perception to employee voice behavior motives: An attribution theory-based review[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1457-1466.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.01457     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2016/V24/I9/1457
[1] YANG Jianfeng; MING Xiaodong. The process and antecedents of team ethical decision-making: A study in Chinese context[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 542-552.
[2] ZHENG Yi; SHANG Junchen; LI Boran; LIANG Yaowen; HE Jiamei; YOU Yilin; JIANG Zhongqing. The factors affecting attractiveness of human voice[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 237-246.
[3] SUN Jian-Min; LU Xinxin. Ethical leadership: Conceptualization and measurement[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 121-132.
[4] TAN Le; SONG Heyi; YANG Xiao. The influence mechanism of environmental uncertainty on leadership effectiveness based on cognitive perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1339-1352.
[5] ZHANG Lulu; YANG Fu; GU Yinhua. Inclusive leadership: Conception, measurement and relationships to related variables[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1467-1477.
[6] ZHANG Zhi-Xue; SHI Junqi; LIU Jun. Advances and frontiers in research of organizational behavior and leadership[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 317-326.
[7] ZHAO Qi; LI Feng. Team leadership and team effectiveness: A multilevel study through the lens of social identity theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1677-1689.
[8] DUAN Jin-Yun; ZHANG Chen; XU Yue. A meta-analysis of the relationship between demographic characteristics and employee voice behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1568-1582.
[9] CHEN Pei; YANG Fu; SHI Wei. Servant leadership: Concept, measurements, influencing factors,  and consequences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 143-157.
[10] WANG Zhen; XU Haoying; DU Chenduo. The Trickle-Down Effect in Leadership Research: A Review and Prospect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 1079-1094.
[11] ZHANG Yongjun; ZHAO Guoxiang. The Influence Mechanism of Ethical Leadership on Employee’s Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Multilevel Perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 926-936.
[12] XIAO Xuezhen; WANG Aiping. Theoretical Debate and Brain Mechanisms of Repetition Blindness Effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 182-191.
[13] CAO Yuankun; ZHU Zhenbing. Implicit Followership Theory: Concepts, Measurement, Antecedents and Consequences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 280-288.
[14] WANG Lei. The Influence of Differential Leadership on Employee and Team Creativity in Chinese Family Businesses: A Multilevel and Longitudinal Study[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1688-1700.
[15] LI Chaoping;SU Qin;SONG Zhaoli. An Interactionlist and Dynamic Research on Employee Socialization Process[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(3): 409-417.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech