Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (5) : 804-814     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00804
Regular Articles |
The effect of sleep deprivation on risky choice: A dual-process models approach
LI Aimei1; TAN Lei1; SUN Hailong1; Xiong Guanxing1; Pan Jiyang2
(1 Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China) (2 Sleep Medicine Center of First Affiliated Hospital, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China)
Download: PDF(449 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Sleep deprivation is a situation of shorter-than-optimal sleep time caused by some environmental or individual reasons. A variety of empirical researches studied the relationship between sleep deprivation and risky choice, but there was an argument about whether sleep deprivation leaded to risk-taking. This paper tried to explore the psychological mechanism between sleep deprivation and risky choice. There are three elements influence risky decision making, (i.e., risk perception, risk tolerance and risk decision strategies), and its psychological mechanism can be explained by dual-process models of cognition and emotion. Furthermore, neural studies provided evidences to support our conclusion. In the future, on the one hand, because most sleep deprivation studies were examined in laboratory, more researches should be focused on the sleep loss in real life; on the other hand, interaction effect of cognition and emotion should be considered to further complete the theoretical model of sleep deprivation and risky choice.

Keywords sleep deprivation      risk perception      risk tolerance      risky choice      dual-process models     
Corresponding Authors: SUN Hailong,E-mail: shl428@163.com LI Aimei,E-mail: tliaim@jnu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 15 May 2016
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Aimei
TAN Lei
SUN Hailong
Xiong Guanxing
Pan Jiyang
Cite this article:   
LI Aimei,TAN Lei,SUN Hailong, et al. The effect of sleep deprivation on risky choice: A dual-process models approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 804-814.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00804     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2016/V24/I5/804
[1] WANG Xinjian, ZHANG Huijuan, WU Di, LV Xiaokang.  Cultural influences on individual risk perception: Cultural cognition theory’s explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1251-1260.
[2] XIANG Peng; GENG Liuna; ZHOU Kexin; CHENG Xiao. Adverse effects and theoretical frameworks of air pollution: An environmental psychology perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 691-700.
[3] LI Kai; GUO Yongyu; YANG Shenlong. Public risk perception of terror attacks[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 358-369.
[4] LI Bin; XU Fuming; WANG Wei; ZHANG Hui; LUO Hanbing. Decision Making Processing and Individual Differences: The Perspective of Fuzzy-trace Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 316-324.
[5] XIONG Guanxing; LI Aimei; WANG X. T.. An Analysis of Wage Gap and Turnover Decisions Based on Tri-Reference Point Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(9): 1363-1371.
[6] ZHAO Guangping;GUO Xiuyan. The New Evidence for Dissociations between Familiarity and Recollection[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1122-1128.
[7] ZHANG Yang-Yang;RAO Li-Lin;LIANG Zhu-Yuan;ZHOU Yuan;LI Shu. Process Test of Risky Decision Making: New Understanding, New Evidence Pitting Non-compensatory Against Compensatory Models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(2): 205-219.
[8] ZHANG Hui;XU Fuming;LI Bin;LUO Hanbing;ZHENG Qiuqiang. Risk Perception Based on Climate Change[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(9): 1677-1685.
[9] X. T. WANG;WANG Peng. Tri-Reference Point Theory of Decision Making: From Principles to Applications[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(8): 1331-1346.
[10] Chen Yi-Wen;Ma Ji-Wei. E-commerce Consumers Purchase Decision and Its Influencing Factors[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 27-34.
[11] SUN Yan. The Intertemporal Choice Under Risk: A Research Proposal[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 28-34.
[12] Zhang Shuoyang,Chen Yiwen,Wang Erping. RISK PERCEPTION IN CONSUMER PSYCHOLOGY[J]. , 2004, 12(02): 256-263.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech