Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2016, Vol. 24 Issue (1) : 91-100     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00091
Regular Articles |
The effect of context on empathy
CHEN Wuying1,2; LIU Lianqi3
(1 School of Educational Science, Jiangsu Normal University, Xuzhou 221116, China)
(2 School of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200235, China)
(3 Publicity Department, Xuzhou Institute of Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China)
Download: PDF(350 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

This review provides a brief introduction of the research about the impact of context on empathy. Empathy is defined as the propensity to “share and understand other’s feelings during interpersonal interaction”. It includes two components of cognitive empathy and emotional empathy. Empathy appears to be a very situational cognitive process as the context has an effect on empathy. The privacy and meaning of the specific context influence the occurance or intensity of empathy. Group membership and interpersonal relationship also influence the processing of empathy. The contextual factors trigger empathic responses through automatic and controlled processing. Although much progress has been made in the field of the contextual effects on empathy, more work could be done in the future. The connotation of contextual factors is worthy to be explored in the future. We could take the perspective of people who empathize with others to confirm how the contextual effect on empathy is moderated by individual differences. Additionally, we can try to explore the mechanism of contextual effects on empathy under the background of cognitive processing.

Keywords empathy      context      group membership      interpersonal relationship      privacy     
Corresponding Authors: LIU Lianqi, E-mail: llqcwy@163.com   
Issue Date: 15 January 2016
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CHEN Wuying
LIU Lianqi
Cite this article:   
CHEN Wuying,LIU Lianqi. The effect of context on empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 91-100.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2016.00091     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2016/V24/I1/91
[1] ZHONG Yiping, ZHAN Youlong, LI Jin, FAN Wei.  Study on the mechanism and intervention of moral decision: Effects of self-relevance and risk level[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1093-1102.
[2] GUO Xiuyan, ZHENG Li, CHENG Xuemei, LIU Yingjie, LI Lin.  The cognitive and neural mechanisms of perception of unfairness and related decision-making process[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 903-911.
[3] DAI Haoyun; XU Xiaodong. Counterfactuals and the underlying processing mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 769-777.
[4] JING Jiaojiao; GAO Chuang; NIU Gengfeng. The effect of internet use on empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 652-661.
[5] MENG Jing; SHEN Lin. Empathy in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Symptoms, theories and neural mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 59-66.
[6] SUN Jian-Min; LU Xinxin. Ethical leadership: Conceptualization and measurement[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 121-132.
[7] TAN Le; SONG Heyi; YANG Xiao. The influence mechanism of environmental uncertainty on leadership effectiveness based on cognitive perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1339-1352.
[8] YUE Tong; HUANG Xiting. The neurobiological underpinnings of trait empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1368-1376.
[9] DING Fengqin; LU Zhaohui. Association between empathy and prosocial behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1159-1174.
[10] ZHANG Yan-Qing; WANG Xiao-Hui; WANG Hai-Bo. Unethical behaviors in organizational context: The explanation from moral disengagement theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1107-1117.
[11] WANG Huifang; JIANG Jingchuan. Framing effect in elderly adults[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 612-621.
[12] YAN Yu; WU Xia. From trust violation to trust repair: The role of moral emotions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 633-642.
[13] YUE Tong; HUANG Xiting. The cognitive neuroscience studies on positive empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 402-409.
[14] XU Fuming; LI Ou; DENG Ying; LI Yan; SHI Yanwei. The projection bias in judgment and decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 422-430.
[15] YAN Yu; WANG Yiming. The spillover and crossover effect of workplace incivility: The negative role beyond work boundary[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1934-1945.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech