Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2015, Vol. 23 Issue (6) : 1031-1040     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.01031
Regular Articles |
Response Inhibition in Smokers
ZHAO Xin1; LIU Xiaoting1; ZAN Xiangyi2; ZHOU Aibao1
(1 Behavior Rehabilitation Training Research Institution, School of Psychology, Northwest Normal University,
Lanzhou 730070, China) (2 Lanzhou University Second Hospital, Lanzhou 730070, China))
Download: PDF(248 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Recent studies have found that smoking affects individual response inhibition ability. Compared with non-smokers, smokers have higher false rates and longer reaction times in the Go/No Go task and Stop signal task. Although smokers have deficits in early response inhibition, there is no difference between smokers and non-smokers in conflict monitoring. In addition, the study also found that smokers’ left thalamus, left middle frontal gyrus, and left anterior cingulate cortex have smaller grey areas than found in non-smokers. Nicotine intake harms the prefrontal cortex and mesolimbic dopamine system, which leads to lower response inhibition ability in smokers. However, some studies have found that smoking does not affect response inhibition ability; these contradictory results may be due to experimental tasks and subject selection. Future research will feature the reaction to individual inhibition in different types of cigarette deprivations, the comparisons of response inhibition between smokers and other addicts (alcohol, drugs), the variance in smokers' response inhibition ability in the oddball, Go/No Go, and the Stop-Signal tasks, and interventions and response inhibition training for smokers.

Keywords Smoking      Response inhibition      Nicotine     
Corresponding Authors: ZAN Xiangyi, E-mail:; ZHOU Aibao, E-mail:    
Issue Date: 25 June 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
LIU Xiaoting
ZAN Xiangyi
ZHOU Aibao
Cite this article:   
ZHAO Xin,LIU Xiaoting,ZAN Xiangyi, et al. Response Inhibition in Smokers[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 1031-1040.
URL:     OR
[1] YAN Ding; WANG Ting; WANG Chengyao; JIAO Can. The influence of drinking on response inhibition and its neural mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 586-598.
[2] YAN Wansen; ZHANG Ranran; LIU Sujiao. The neural mechanisms of impulsivity implicated in drug addiction and non-drug addiction[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(2): 159-172.
[3] ZHAO Xin; CHEN Ling; ZHANG Peng. The Training of Inhibition Control: Content, Effect and Mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 51-60.
[4] ZHANG Yang;PENG Chunhua;SUN Yang;ZHANG Ming. Cognitive Mechanism of Visual Inhibition of Return[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(11): 1913-1926.
[5] WANG Yan; CAI Hou-De. Mental Processing Models and Neural Mechanisms for Response Inhibition[J]. , 2010, 18(02): 220-229.
[6] Chen Yuying;Sui Guangyuan;Zhai Bin. Voluntary Control of Saccadic Eye Movements: Experimental Paradigm, Nerve Mechanisms and Application[J]. , 2008, 16(01): 154-162.
[7] Deng Linyuan,Fang Xiaoyi. Neurobiological Mechanism of Nicotine Dependence[J]. , 2005, 13(04): 534-543.
[8] Lin Danhua, Fang Xiaoyi. ADOLESCENT SMOKING PREVENTION AND INTERVENTION PROGRAMS[J]. , 2002, 10(02): 199-205.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech