Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2015, Vol. 23 Issue (6) : 967-978     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00967
Regular Articles |
Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment
LIU Chenghao; XU Fuming; WANG Wei; LI Yan; SHI Yanwei
(School of Psychology, Central China Normal University; Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province; Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education, Wuhan 430079, China)
Download: PDF(290 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

The conjunction fallacy in probability judgment refers to a phenomenon of probability judgment bias, which results from violating the conjunction rules of event occurrence probability and regarding that the occurrence probability of conjunction event that contains multiple independent events is greater than that of conjunct events in it. The definition standard of conjunction fallacy is incongruent. The relevant mental mechanism includes causal model theory, confirmation theory and surprise theory and so on, and many factors affect conjunction fallacy, like frequency effect, training effect, individual differences, and many others. Studies in the future should combine the mental mechanism of inverse conjunction fallacy to perfect the existing explanatory theory, meanwhile, the conjunction fallacy in application and its irrationality should be noticed.

Keywords conjunction fallacy      psychological mechanism      effect factors      inverse conjunction fallacy      irrationality     
Corresponding Authors: XU Fuming, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 25 June 2015
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
LIU Chenghao
XU Fuming
LI Yan
SHI Yanwei
Cite this article:   
LIU Chenghao,XU Fuming,WANG Wei, et al. Conjunction Fallacy in Probability Judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 967-978.
URL:     OR
[1] YU Xiaoxia; YUAN Yuan; XIN Ziqiang. Word scale and numerical scale: Differences, mechanisms, and methodological issues in scale development[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 201-210.
[2] WANG Caiyu; LEI Li. The connotation, influence factors and mechanism of herding effect in online shopping context[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 298-311.
[3] ZHANG Qi; YIN Tianzi; RAN Guangming. Psychological and Neural Mechanisms for the Superiority Effect of Dynamic Facial Expressions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1514-1522.
[4] QIN Qiuxia; YU Haitao; QIAO Qincai. Psychological Mechanism on National Identification of Cross-border Ethnicity in An Age of Globalization[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(5): 745-754.
[5] LI Aimei; GAO Jieyi; PENG Yuan; XIA Ying. The Asymmetric Adaptation to Positive and Negative Emotions and its Mechanism Exploration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 632-642.
[6] LI Yingwu; YU Zhou; HAN Xiao; LIU Tinganxu. General Mental Ability Predicts Performance: The State and Mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 448-459.
[7] LIAO Dongsheng; YANG Fang; ZHANG Jingxuan. Unconscious Goal Prime: Definition, Mechanism and Application[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(11): 1829-1836.
[8] HU Jin-Sheng;YE Chun;LI Xu;GAO Ting-Ting. “Irrationality” in Justice Judgment: Processing Mechanisms, Main Forms and Influencing Factors[J]. , 2012, 20(5): 726-734.
[9] DUAN Jin-Yun;ZHANG Qian. The Study of Voice Behavior in the Perspective of Cognition: Cognitive Factors, Theoretical Basis and Formation Mechanism[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 115-126.
[10] WANG Fen;HUANG Yu-Xia. Psychological and Neural Mechanisms of Mindfulness[J]. , 2011, 19(11): 1635-1644.
[11] LI Jian-Bin;NIE Yan-Gang. Reflection and Prospect on Core Self-Evaluations[J]. , 2010, 18(12): 1848-1857.
[12] CHEN Rui-Jun;QIN Qi-Wen. A Summary of Optimistic Bias[J]. , 2010, 18(11): 1822-1827.
[13] Jiang Duo; Xu Fu–Ming; Chen Xue–Ling; Liu Teng–Fei; Zhang Jun–Wei. The Psychological Mechanism and Influence Factors of Herd Behavior of Investors in the Capital Market[J]. , 2010, 18(05): 810-818.
[14] LIN Ling; TANG Han-Ying; MA Hong-Yu. The Psychological Mechanism of Counterproductive Work Behavior in the Workplace[J]. , 2010, 18(01): 151-161.
[15] REN Jun1 SHI Jing1 MA Tian-Yu. A Summary of Researches on Flow[J]. , 2009, 17(01): 210-217.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech