Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2015, Vol. 23 Issue (6) : 959-966     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00959
Regular Articles |
Spatial Cognitive Style and Its Relationship with Spatial Abilities
ZUO Tingting; HU Qingfen
(Institute of Developmental Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
Download: PDF(181 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Clear individual difference is found on performance in various spatial tasks, which can be explained by difference on Spatial Cognitive Style. The Spatial Cognitive Style includes three types: the Landmark Style, the Route Style, and the Survey Style. People with the Landmark Style can only represent perceptually salient visual features of objects, but they cannot represent the relevant spatial information of the objects. People with the Route Style can represent not only perceptually salient visual features of the objects, but also the relevant sequential spatial information of the objects. People with the Survey Style can represent perceptually salient visual features and the sequential spatial information of the objects. Besides, they can also represent the relevant simultaneous spatial information of the objects. People with the Survey Style show the best spatial abilities, whereas people with the Landmark Style show the worst. Males and people with low levels of anxiety show more the Survey Style comparing with females and people with high anxiety respectively. Thus, it will help to improve people’s spatial abilities if learners can be instructed considering their Spatial Cognitive Styles.

Keywords spatial cognitive style      spatial performance      individual difference     
Corresponding Authors: HU Qingfen, E-mail: qingfenhu@bnu.edu.cn   
Issue Date: 25 June 2015
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZUO Tingting
HU Qingfen
Cite this article:   
ZUO Tingting,HU Qingfen. Spatial Cognitive Style and Its Relationship with Spatial Abilities[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 959-966.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2015.00959     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2015/V23/I6/959
[1] QIAN Liu, Ru Taotao, LUO Xue, Niu Jiaxing, Ma Yongjun, ZHOU Guofu. Effect of sleep restriction on cognitive function and its underlying mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(9): 1493-1507.
[2] Hebin ZHAO, Mian XIA, Ben CAO, Guangrong JIANG. Application of contact intervention to reduce public stigma of mental disorders[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(5): 843-857.
[3] Jingyi LU, Xuesong SHANG. Making decisions for others: Multi-dimensional psychological mechanisms and decision feelings[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(9): 1545-1552.
[4] Xiaoyan YE, Delong ZHANG, Song CHANG, Ming LIU. The individual difference of visual mental imagery and its neural basis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(7): 1186-1192.
[5] Shan Xu; Xiang-Zhen Kong; Yiying Song; Jia Liua. Game-based assessment on visuospatial ability in a large population of human participants: an Internet-based big-data approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 14-.
[6] FENG Xue; PENG Kaiping. Skill or Style: Two Approaches to Measure Individual Differences on Rational Thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1550-1559.
[7] WANG Yan; YANG Juan. The Modulation Effect of Personality Traits on the #br# Psychosocial Stress Response[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1453-1460.
[8] ZHANG Xiuping; YANG Xiaohong; YANG Yufang. The Neural Mechanism and Influential Factors of Semantic Unification in Discourse Comprehension[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1130-1141.
[9] QIU Fanghui; LUO Yuejia; JIA Shiwei. Categorical Perception of Facial Expression and Its Individual Differences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 946-958.
[10] LI Bin; XU Fuming; WANG Wei; ZHANG Hui; LUO Hanbing. Decision Making Processing and Individual Differences: The Perspective of Fuzzy-trace Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(2): 316-324.
[11] JIANG Jun;WANG Zimeng;WAN Xuan;JIANG Cunmei. Temporal Processing in Music: Effects of Musical Elements and Individual Differences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 650-658.
[12] CHEN Jiangtao; TANG Dandan; LIU Congcong; CHEN Antao. Individual Differences in Attentional Blink[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1564-1572.
[13] ZHOU Lei;LI Shu;XU Yan;LIANG Zhuyuan. Theoretical Construction of Decision-Making Styles: An Information-Processing Approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 112-121.
[14] ZHANG Jing;LIU Ke;ZHAO Xin. Can Automatic Emotion Regulation Be Manipulated? A Review of the Measurements[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(9): 1554-1559.
[15] LI Xiang;ZHENG Yong;MENG Xianxin;LI Peng;LI Hong. Adult’s Reaction to Infant Cry and Its Brain Mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1770-1779.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech