Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (12) : 1953-1963     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01953
Regular Articles |
Mate Choice and Human Voice
WU Baopei1; WU Jing2; CHANG Lei2; LI Lu1
(1 Department of Psychology, Beijing Forestry University, Beijing 100083, China) (2 Department of Educational Psychology, The Chinese University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong, China)
Download: PDF(277 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

In this paper, we review relevant studies to develop the evolutionary hypothesis that voice quality is related to human mating behavior and that this relationship extends to other domains of human social living. Both men and women show preferences for certain voice quality of the opposite sex. In general, males prefer high-pitched female voice, and females prefer low-pitched male voice. This voice preference results in the carriers having differential reproductive success. We analyze this phenomenon for men and women, respectively. A low voice pitch is partly caused by a longer vocal track due to the descent of the larynx in adolescence that results in smaller formant dispersion. The lowered position of the larynx is associated with higher rates of choking which therefore serves as an honest indicator of good genes. The lowering of the larynx is also associated with increased testosterone which is an indicator of good genes as well as intra-sex combativeness and competitiveness. Thus, sexual selection through female choice, which is mainly for good genes but also male-male competitiveness and thus good provisioning, provides the mechanism underlying the female preference for low pitched male voice. The more straightforward evolutionary explanation of male preference for high pitched female voice is that high pitch indicates fertility and, because of concealed human ovulation, men develop heightened sensitivity over fertility indicators such as high pitched voice. We review these theories and the relevant empirical research supporting the association between the quality of voice and mating success. Beyond mating behavior, we also show that the effect of voice quality extends to other domains by affecting social cognition of and for the target persons with some of the effects being negative. In the end, we discuss a number of directions for future research, including the use of additional voice parameters other than fundamental frequency, the application of sexual selection in analyzing mainstream research on intimate relationships, and the potential relationship between voice preferences and such cognitive processes as attention and memory.

Keywords mate choice      voice pitch      fundamental frequency      hormone      good genes      evolutionary psychology     
Corresponding Authors: WU Baopei, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 15 December 2014
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
WU Baopei
WU Jing
Cite this article:   
WU Baopei,WU Jing,CHANG Lei, et al. Mate Choice and Human Voice[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(12): 1953-1963.
URL:     OR
[1] JIN Yuchang, DING Meiyue.  Predictive factors and the neurophysiological mechanism of postpartum depression[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1145-1161.
[2] YANG Xiaoli; LIU Xiaoxiao; BAI Baoyu. The psychological effects of body height and the mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 857-865.
[3] SU Jinlong; SU Yanjie. The psychological effects of mating motive[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 609-626.
[4] WANG Xing-Xing, WANG Xiao-Dong.  The mechanisms for the effects of early-life stress on adult hippocampal neurogenesis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(12): 2030-2035.
[5] CHEN Leilei, NIE Lina, LI Yu, CHENG Peng, LI Ming, GAO Jun.  Serotoninergic mechanisms in maternal behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(12): 2089-2098.
[6] LI Xuejuan, ZHANG Lingcong, LI Hong.  The neurobiological system for the influence of emotional arousal on memory consolidation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(10): 1749-1757.
[7] ZHUANG Jinying; WANG Jiaxi. The Relationship Between Menstrual Cycles and Women’s Ornamental Behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(5): 729-736.
[8] WU Baopei; WU Jing; HE Xiaona; LI Lu. Opposite-Sex Friendship from Multiple Perspectives[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(9): 1485-1495.
[9] LI Bin;XU Fuming;WANG Wei;ZHANG Hui;LUO Hanbing. The Origin of Loss Aversion[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(8): 1319-1327.
[10] WU Baopei;ZHU Xiaoqin;CHANG Lei. Cheater-Detection from Lens of Evolutionary Psychology: Accuracy and Modularity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(12): 2224-2234.
[11] WU Baopei;ZHU Xiaoqin;CHANG Lei. Individual Differences in Grandparental Investment: An Evolutionary Psychological Perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(11): 2082-2090.
[12] WU Bao-Pei;CHANG Lei. Envy: A Social Emotion Characterized by Hostility Envy: A Social Emotion Characterized by Hostility[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(9): 1467-1478.
[13] WANG Rui-Le;LIU Han-Hui;ZHANG Xiao-Yi. The Asymmetric Kin Altruism: From the Perspective of Evolutionary Psychology[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 910-917.
[14] WU Bao-Pei;GAO Shu-Ling. Moral Hypocrisy: An Opportunistic Adaptive Strategy[J]. , 2012, 20(6): 926-934.
[15] ZHUANG Jin-Ying;ZHANG Jin-Mei;YING Juan-Juan. Facial Self-Resemblance in Kinship Selection and Mate Choice[J]. , 2011, 19(9): 1371-1377.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech