Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (12) : 1944-1952     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01944
Regular Articles |
Collectivism and Bribery
HUANG Zhenwei; LIU Li; TAN Xuyun; ZHENG Wenwen; ZHANG Jiqi
(School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, Beijing 100875, China)
Download: PDF(292 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Can collectivism promote bribery? This article tries to answer the question by reviewing the related research. Bribery is an “arrangement” that involves “an exchange between two parties” which has an influence on the allocation of resources either immediately or in the future. Social scientists have paid a great attention to whether collectivism can promote bribery. The results from various perspectives of bribery and kinds of collectivism were different. There were three perspectives of bribery: perception of bribery, the attitudes towards bribery and bribery behavior (propensity). It is consistently found that collectivism facilitated bribery behavior propensity. However, mixed results were found regarding the relationships of collectivism to the perception of bribery and attitudes towards bribery. With the developing of collectivism construct, researchers also tried to figure out whether different kinds of collectivism have different relationships with bribery. Meanwhile, the underlying processes of the impact of collectivism on bribery were explored from the perspectives of moral engagement and the theory of planned behavior. To further explore the effect of collectivism on bribery, three future research directions were suggested.

Keywords collectivism      bribery      moral engagement      Theory of Planned Behavior.     
Corresponding Authors: LIU Li, E-mail:   
Issue Date: 15 December 2014
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
HUANG Zhenwei
TAN Xuyun
ZHENG Wenwen
Cite this article:   
HUANG Zhenwei,LIU Li,TAN Xuyun, et al. Collectivism and Bribery[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(12): 1944-1952.
URL:     OR
[1] GUO Xucheng, MA Hongyu, JIANG Hai, YUAN Ming.  Work-family interaction in the context of individualism-collectivism culture[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1036-1044.
[2] XU Jiang; REN Xiaopeng; SU Hong. The influencing factors of individualism/collectivism: A perspective of ecology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1309-1318.
[3] MA Xinran; REN Xiaopeng; XU Jiang. The difference of collectivism between north and south China and its cultural dynamics[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1551-1555.
[4] A Bu-Lai-Ti-Jiang; LIU Yang; ZHU Xiao-Rui; ZHENG Rui; LIANG Zhu-Yuan; RAO Li-Lin; WU Bin; LI Shu. The Effect of Self on Intertemporal Choice from the Perspective of Cultural Individualism-collectivism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(11): 1981-1990.
[5] SU Hong;REN Xiaopeng. Regional Difference and Cross-generational Change of Individualism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 1006-1015.
[6] WU Peijun; LI Ye. Cultural Differences of the Belief in A Just World[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(11): 1814-1822.
[7] ZHANG Tian;SUN Hui;FU An-Qiu. Forgiveness in Collectivism Culture and Its Enlightenment to Forgiveness Intervention[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 265-273.
[8] YANG Shuai;HUANG Xi-Ting;WANG Xiao-Gang;YIN Tian-Zi. Neural Mechanism of Cultural Influences on the Self-construal[J]. , 2012, 20(1): 149-157.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech