Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (10) : 1628-1636     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01628
Regular Articles |
Guilt from the Perspective of Morality: An Intergrated Review
ZHANG Kun1; FANG Ping1; JIANG Yuan2; YU Yue1; OUYANG Henglei1
(1 Department of Psychology, School of Education, Capital Normal University, Beijing 100048, China) (2 Division of Sport Psychology, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China)
Download: PDF(264 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

For decades, the researches on guilt have attracted significant attention, most of which were focused on the children development and mental health. While in recent years, the focus has been turned to the moral dimension of guilt, concerning more about the moral values of emotions in interpersonal relationship and social events. Guilt, a moral emotion, develops with moral consciousness and plays an important role in maintaining and reconstructing social relations and the development of emotions. From the perspective of morality, this review gives detailed discussions on the definition, generation mechanism, behavioral response and prosocial impacts of guilt. It is hoped that this study can provide some new insights into domestic studies in this field.

Keywords guilt      morality      compensate      prosocial impacts     
Corresponding Authors: FANG Ping, E-mail: pfang2007@126.com   
Issue Date: 15 October 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Kun
FANG Ping
JIANG Yuan
YU Yue
OUYANG Henglei
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Kun,FANG Ping,JIANG Yuan, et al. Guilt from the Perspective of Morality: An Intergrated Review[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1628-1636.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01628     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I10/1628
[1] YIN Rong, ZHANG Fei-Fei, WANG Yuan-Yuan, XU Zhi-Hong.  Collective guilt: Definition, psychological mechanisms, action tendency and interventions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1058-1068.
[2] YAN Yu; WU Xia. From trust violation to trust repair: The role of moral emotions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 633-642.
[3] JIN Yuchang; WANG Guan. Moral Motive about Approaching the Advantages and Avoiding the Disadvantages[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1647-1657.
[4] YE Hongyan; ZHANG Fenghua. Embodiment in Moral Judgment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1480-1488.
[5] LENG Bingbing; WANG Xiangling; GAO Heming; LI Fuhong. Cognitive and Emotional Activities of Guilt and the Corresponding Brain Network[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2064-2071.
[6] BAI Lin; CHEN Chen; CHEN Huiwen. Consumer Guilt: The Frontier Analysis of Dimension, Process and Empirical Research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1818-1829.
[7] WANG Xue;WU Song;SUN Jiaqing;FENG Ziqi;JIN Shenghua. On Greed: the Attitude, Motivation and Decision-Making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(4): 740-750.
[8] CHEN Haobin;WANG Fengyan. Wisdom: Structure, Category, Measurement and Relationships to Related Variables[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(1): 108-117.
[9] YAN Shu-Chang. Physical Cleanliness and Morality[J]. , 2011, 19(8): 1242-1248.
[10] SHI Wei;YAN Xian-Yang;LIU Jie
. Emotional Reactions to Historical Injustice Events: Collective Guilt[J]. , 2011, 19(2): 224-232.
[11] YU Feng;PENG Kai-Ping;HAN Ting-Ting;CHAI Fang-Yuan;BAI Yang. Dilemma of Moral Dilemmas: The Conflict between Emotion and Reasoning in Moral Judgments[J]. , 2011, 19(11): 1702-1712.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech