Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (9) : 1423-1434     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01423
Regular Articles |
Gender Differences of Empathy
CHEN Wuying1,2; LU Jiamei2; LIU Lianqi3; LIN Wenyi4
(1 School of Educational Science, Jiangsu Normal University, Jiangsu Xuzhou 221116, China) (2 School of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200235, China) (3 Publicity Department, Xuzhou Institute of Technology, Xuzhou 221008, China) (4 School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China)
Download: PDF(356 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

This review provides a brief introduction to the research of empathy, focusing on the differences of genders and the reason why there are such differences. Empathy is defined as the propensity of “share and understand other’s feelings during interpersonal interaction”, which includes cognitive empathy and emotional empathy. Empathy has no gender differences in the preschool stage. During the stage of primary and secondary school, gender differences can be found. The gender differences of empathy are related to two main factors. One factor is the degree of physiological maturity. As we grow older, hormone are different between female and male. Female have more oxytocin, which is positive to emotional empathy. While male have more testosterone, which is negative related to cognitive empathy. Consequently, gender differences of empathy begin to appear. The other factor is the gender role. The orientation of woman’s gender role is focusing on others, which is directly related to empathy. However, the orientation of man’s gender role is focusing on justice and equity, which has no relation to empathy. After acquiring the gender role, man and woman have differences in empathy and especially in emotional empathy. Although much progress has been made in the field of differences of empathy development, much work should be done in the future. On the theory construction, we can try to distinguish empathy by the dimension of capacity and disposition. On the visual angle, we can study gender differences of empathy through the interaction of age, culture and gender. Lastly, we should empathize the influencing factors of empathy in our research.

Keywords empathy      cognitive empathy      emotional empathy      gender difference      gender role     
Corresponding Authors: LU Jiamei, E-mail: lujiamei@vip.163.com   
Issue Date: 15 September 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CHEN Wuying
LU Jiamei
LIU Lianqi
LIN Wenyi
Cite this article:   
CHEN Wuying,LU Jiamei,LIU Lianqi, et al. Gender Differences of Empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(9): 1423-1434.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01423     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I9/1423
[1] ZHONG Yiping, ZHAN Youlong, LI Jin, FAN Wei.  Study on the mechanism and intervention of moral decision: Effects of self-relevance and risk level[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1093-1102.
[2] JING Jiaojiao; GAO Chuang; NIU Gengfeng. The effect of internet use on empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 652-661.
[3] MENG Jing; SHEN Lin. Empathy in individuals with autism spectrum disorder: Symptoms, theories and neural mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 59-66.
[4] YUE Tong; HUANG Xiting. The neurobiological underpinnings of trait empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1368-1376.
[5] DING Fengqin; LU Zhaohui. Association between empathy and prosocial behavior: A systematic review and meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1159-1174.
[6] CAO Yanmiao; WANG Meiping; CAO Cong; ZHANG Wenxin. The polygenic underpinnings of depression[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 525-535.
[7] YAN Yu; WU Xia. From trust violation to trust repair: The role of moral emotions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 633-642.
[8] YUE Tong; HUANG Xiting. The cognitive neuroscience studies on positive empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 402-409.
[9] XU Fuming; LI Ou; DENG Ying; LI Yan; SHI Yanwei. The projection bias in judgment and decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 422-430.
[10] YAN Yu; WANG Yiming. The spillover and crossover effect of workplace incivility: The negative role beyond work boundary[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1934-1945.
[11] CHEN Wuying; LIU Lianqi. The effect of context on empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 91-100.
[12] SHI Yanwei; XU Fuming; WANG Wei; LI Yan; LIU Chenghao. Empathetic Social Pain: Evidence from Neuroimaging[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1608-1616.
[13] SHEN Wangbing; LIU Chang; SHI Chunhua; YUAN Yuan. Gender Differences in Creative Thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1380-1389.
[14] YANG Tianliang; XIN Fei; LEI Xu. Gender Differences in the Human Brain Structure and Function: Evidence from Neuroimaging Studies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 571-581.
[15] ZUO Shijiang;WANG Fang;SHI Xiafei;ZHANG Xiao. Primitive Emotional Contagion and the Challenge of Current Research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(5): 791-801.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech