Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (8) : 1294-1302     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01294
Regular Articles |
Meta-stereotype and Its Impacts on Intergroup Relations
HE Wen;SUN Yawen;LUO Junlong
College of Education, Shanghai Normal University, Shanghai 200234, China
Download: PDF(161 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Meta-stereotype refers to a person’s beliefs regarding the stereotype that out-group members hold about his or her own group. As intergroup meta-perception, the content and valence of meta-stereotype can reflect intergroup relations to a certain extent. In recent years, more and more researches had demonstrated that meta-stereotype exerted stronger influence on intergroup relation than other-stereotype. Meta-stereotype activation is more complicated and leads to a series of effects on people’s feeling, thought and behavior. Future research should further explore the following issues: researchers should pay more attention to mental mechanism of meta-stereotype impacts on intergroup relations; explore the strategies that meta-stereotype may improve intergroup relations, different groups in the Chinese cultural context should also be taken into consideration in the research.

Keywords meta-stereotype      activation      intergroup relations     
Corresponding Authors: LUO Junlong   
Issue Date: 15 August 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
HE Wen
SUN Yawen
LUO Junlong
Cite this article:   
HE Wen,SUN Yawen,LUO Junlong. Meta-stereotype and Its Impacts on Intergroup Relations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(8): 1294-1302.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01294     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I8/1294
[1] Tingyu HE, Yi DING, Haokun LI, Xiaorong CHENG, Zhao FAN, Xianfeng DING. The multidimensional spatial representation of time: Dissociations on its ontogenetic origin and activation mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 935-944.
[2] Jing ZHANG, Weihe LI, Yanwei SHI, Nan ZHANG, Hongyu MA. Work-related rumination and its “double-edged sword” effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(2): 358-367.
[3] Yuxin LIU, Chen CHEN, Nan ZHU, Jianwei ZHANG, Shuai WANG. How does “one takes on the attributes of one's associates”? The past, present, and future of Trait Activation Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(1): 161-177.
[4] Hongyu WANG, Zhisong CUI, Chunlong ZOU, Jiali YU, Di ZHAO. Loyal or rebel? Employee bootleg innovation in Chinese context[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 975-989.
[5] JING Wei, LIU Ziqin.  The diminished attention to eye in the face processing of individuals with autism spectrum disorder[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(3): 476-487.
[6] GAO Zhihua; LU Zhongyi; CUI Xinying. What is the mechanism of negation processes? Introduction and commentary on psychological theories on negation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 413-423.
[7] ZHOU Linshu, ZHAO Huaiyang, JIANG Cunmei.  Neural plasticity to musical performance training: A meta-analysis study[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(11): 1877-1887.
[8] JIANG Ronghuan; LI Xiaodong. Developmental Reversals in False Memory: Why the More Grown up the More Fallible?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1371-1379.
[9] YANG Qun1; ZHANG Qingfanf1,2. Aging of Speech Production: Behavioral and Neural Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2072-2084.
[10] LI Yu;SHU Hua. The Brain Mechanisms and Functional Hypothesis of Default Mode Network and Its Clinical Application[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(2): 234-249.
[11] ZHANG Lingyan;JIN Tan;TIAN Zhaoxia. On the Time Axis of Morpho-semantic Activation: Form-then-meaning or Form-with-meaning?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(8): 1382-1389.
[12] WANG Xiaojuan;YANG Jianfeng. The Dynamic Neural Network and Its Development of Visual Word Processing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 199-204.
[13] YU Haitao;YANG Jinhua;ZHANG Yanjun;JIN Shenghua. Imagining Contact Reduce Intergroup Bias: Theoretical Basis, Practical Demand, Underlying Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1824-1832.
[14] YANG Xiao-Li;LIU Li;LI Qiong;WAN Mei-Na. The Entitativity of Social Group: Retrospect and Prospect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(8): 1314-1321.
[15] CHEN Zhen-Zhen;CAI Wei;ZHENG Yong. Existing Evidence and Controversy of Subliminal Persuasion[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 575-583.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech