Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (7) : 1178-1187     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01178
Regular Articles |
Moral Behavior under Two Kinds of Moral Self-regulation Mechanisms
ZHANG Hongwei;LI Ye
(Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education; Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, School of Psychology, Central China Normal University, Wuhan 430079, China)
Download: PDF(155 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Moral self-regulation is individual does or does not engage moral behavior (immoral behavior), according to the moral self. Moral self falls into temporary moral self (moral self-perception) and stable moral self (moral identity). The negative feedback mechanism of moral self-regulation is that people keep the dynamic of moral behavior according to moral self-perception, and it includes two kinds of phenomena: moral cleansing effect and moral licensing effect. The positive feedback mechanism of moral self-regulation is that people maintain the consistency of moral behavior according to moral identity. Construal level theory not only integrates the positive feedback mechanism with the negative feedback mechanism, but also integrates two moral behaviors. Future research should explore the influence of public-self and individual differences on two moral self-regulation mechanisms.

Keywords moral self-regulation      moral identity      moral cleansing      moral licensing      construal level theory     
Corresponding Authors: LI Ye   
Issue Date: 15 July 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
ZHANG Hongwei
LI Ye
Cite this article:   
ZHANG Hongwei,LI Ye. Moral Behavior under Two Kinds of Moral Self-regulation Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1178-1187.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01178     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I7/1178

null

[1] LI Ming-Hui, RAO Li-Lin.  Moral judgment from construal level theory perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1423-1430.
[2] WANG Caiyu; LEI Li; WU Bo. The influence of temporal reference on inaction inertia of green innovative consumption[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 1-11.
[3] ZHANG Yue; XIN Ziqiang. Priming research in social psychology: Approaches and challenges[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 844-854.
[4] DENG Ying; XU Fu-Ming; LI Ou; SHI Yan-Wei; LIU Cheng-Hao. The framing effect on social preferences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 622-632.
[5] WU Bo; LI Dongjin; WANG Caiyu. The psychological mechanism of green consumption based on moral identity theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1829-1843.
[6] LIU Cuicui;CHEN Bin;LIU Leixin;YUAN Xianxue;WANG Zuojun. Does Standers-by Always See More Than Gamesters?A Review on the Self-other Decision Making Differences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 879-885.
[7] YAN Jin;LOU Chunhua. Decision-making under Ethical Temptation: How Construal Level Theory May Help[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(11): 2047-2056.
[8] LI Yan-Chen; ZHOU Ting-Rui; ZHOU Xiu. Theoretical Models of Multisensory Cues Integration……WEN Xiao-Hui, LIU Qiang, SUN Hong-Jin, et al.(666)
Construal Level Theory: From Temporal Distance to Psychological Distanc
[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 667-677.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech