Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (7) : 1075-1083     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01075
Conceptual Framework |
Corporate Hypocrisy in Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives: Structure and Scale Development
WANG Jingyi;WANG Haizhong
(1 School of Business Administration, Guangdong University of Finance & Economics, Guangzhou 510320, China) (2 Business School, Sun Yat-sen University, Guangzhou 510275, China)
Download: PDF(229 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Improper corporate social responsibility (CSR) activities can cause consumer’s perceived corporate hypocrisy, which will bring extremely negative influences to enterprises. The concept of hypocrisy has just been introduced into Marketing, and needs exact definition and a scientific scale. We focuse on Chinese culture, and will conduct series of studies in order to, (1) explores the connotation of the concept of corporate hypocrisy and differentiate it with the relative conceptions; (2) reveal the structure of the construct, develop its scale and take strict reliability and validity examinations; (3) explore its cause and effect, especially its influence on three levels of consumer’s attitude and behaviors.

Keywords corporate hypocrisy      structure      scale development      corporate social responsibility     
Corresponding Authors: WANG Haizhong   
Issue Date: 15 July 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
WANG Jingyi
WANG Haizhong
Cite this article:   
WANG Jingyi,WANG Haizhong. Corporate Hypocrisy in Corporate Social Responsibility Initiatives: Structure and Scale Development[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1075-1083.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.01075     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I7/1075
[1] SUN Hailong; XING Qiang; LI Aimei. The influence of working memory on perceptual category learning: Problem and conception[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 424-430.
[2] YU Xiaoxia; YUAN Yuan; XIN Ziqiang. Word scale and numerical scale: Differences, mechanisms, and methodological issues in scale development[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 201-210.
[3] Hui Xu; Chaoyi Qin; Yunxian Bai; Zheng Tan; Yali Pan; Yanyan Li; Wenjing Zhou; Tao Zhang; Liang Wang. Lateral prefrontal cortex triggers bistable perception switching using human intracranial EEG[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 24-.
[4] YUE Tong; HUANG Xiting. The neurobiological underpinnings of trait empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1368-1376.
[5] LI Songze; HU Jinsheng; LI Chengshi; WANG Qi; LIU Shuqing; KANG Xiaodong; CUI Li . Visual-spatial working memory deficits and neural mechanism in autism spectrum disorder[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1050-1064.
[6] LIU Yanli; LU Guizhi; LIU Yong. Personal need for structure: Concept, measurements and relationships to related variables[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(2): 228-241.
[7] SUN Bingli; TIAN Yu; SUN Haiyang; WANG Wenzhong. Self: A Perspective from psychological counseling and therapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 83-90.
[8] HE Wen-Guang. Cognitive Mechanism, Affecting Factors and Its Neural Basis in L2 Syntactic Processing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1540-1549.
[9] WANG Caiyu; LEI Li. The Connotation, Mechanism and Corporate Response of Social Responsible Consumption[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1245-1257.
[10] JIANG Yongzhi; BAI Xiaoli. The Development of Values in Cultural Change: Concept, Structure and Methods[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(5): 888-896.
[11] YANG Tianliang; XIN Fei; LEI Xu. Gender Differences in the Human Brain Structure and Function: Evidence from Neuroimaging Studies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 571-581.
[12] XU Xiaodong;CHEN Qingrong. The Influence of Focus Structures on the Interpretation of Pronoun in Mandarin Chinese: Evience from ERP[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 902-910.
[13] WANG Xia;TAN Guohua;WANG Xu;ZHANG Minqiang;LUO Cong. The Mixture Item Response Theory Models and Its Application Traces[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(3): 540-548.
[14] YANG Xiangdong. Toward A Principled Structure Analysis Method of Algebra Story Problems for Item Generation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(3): 558-570.
[15] GAO Riguang;WANG Biying. Antecedents of Destructive Leadership Behaviors in Chinese Organizational Context: A Longitudinal Research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(2): 227-233.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech