Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (6) : 902-910     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00902
Conceptual Framework |
The Influence of Focus Structures on the Interpretation of Pronoun in Mandarin Chinese: Evience from ERP
XU Xiaodong;CHEN Qingrong
(1 School of Foreign Languages and Cultures, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China) (2 School of Psychology, Nanjing Normal University, Nanjing 210097, China)
Download: PDF(229 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Up to now, although there have been a great number of studies conducted to deal with the problem of pronoun resolution, most of these studies were concerned with the question of how syntactic and semantic constraints influence the process of pronoun resolution. The question of how pronoun resolution is influenced by pragmatically-based constraints, i.e. information structure (especially focus structure) has not received as much attention in the literature. In particular, we know little about the processes of how focus structures interact with other linguistic information, such as grammatical role, verb semantic, and distance-related factors, to determine the interpretation of pronoun. The purpose of this project is to gain insight into the question of how information structure, namely focus structures, influences the interpretation of the pronoun. In order to achieve this aim, we choose two different types of focus structures, that is, a top-down focus structure (linguistic focus) and a bottom-up focus structure (non-linguistic focus). More specifically, by measuring the latency and amplitude of Event related potential (ERP) components, we want to reveal the process of how these two different types of focus structures exert their influence on pronoun resolution, and during this process whether/how different focus information interact with syntactic and semantic information. Moreover, we also want to reveal the correspondingly electrophysiological correlates underlying these different processing stages. The systematic studies of how focus structures exert their influence on the process of pronoun resolution and especially, how focus information interacts with other syntactic and semantic information during pronoun resolution, can tell us how linguistic constraints (top-down information) and non-linguistic constraints (bottom-up information) interact with each other to contribute to anaphor resolution and sentence representation. Specifically, there are three key questions to address in this project, which are: 1) how top-down focus information influences the pronoun resolution; 2) how bottom-up focus information influences the pronoun resolution; 3) how focus structure, grammatical role, and verb semantic interact with each other during pronoun resolution.

Keywords Information structure      focus structure      pronoun resolution      ERP     
Corresponding Authors: XU Xiaodong   
Issue Date: 15 June 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
XU Xiaodong
CHEN Qingrong
Cite this article:   
XU Xiaodong,CHEN Qingrong. The Influence of Focus Structures on the Interpretation of Pronoun in Mandarin Chinese: Evience from ERP[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(6): 902-910.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00902     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I6/902
[1] XIN Xin; REN Gui-Qin; LI Jin-Cai; TANG Xiao-Yu. The characteristics and mechanisms of audiovisual integration: Evidence from mismatch negativity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 757-768.
[2] WANG Pei; LIU Yonghe; TAN Chenhao; LI Yu; WANG Zixin; BAI Yonghai. Conflict schemas moderate the effects of emotions on interpersonal relations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 331-341.
[3] Hao Zhou; Yijun Ge; Lan Wang; Peng Zhang; Sheng He. Feedback Signal Contributes to The Flash Grab Effect: Evidence from fMRI and ERP Study[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 33-.
[4] RAN Guang-Ming; CHEN Xu; ZHANG Xing; MA Yuan-Xiao. The neural mechanism for the superiority effect of social prediction[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 684-691.
[5] WANG Pei; Liang Yajun; LI Yu; LIU Yonghe. The effects of characteristic perception and relationship perception on interpersonal trust[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 815-823.
[6] ZHU Yanhan; ZHOU Yiyong; LIU Liying; LI Bosi. Interpersonal conflict in organization: Types, models and expression[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 824-835.
[7] MA Ke; TIAN Xi-Zhou. High-quality connections in organization[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1636-1646.
[8] CHEN Wuying; LIU Lianqi. The effect of context on empathy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 91-100.
[9] LI Songwei; FAN Fumin. Cognitive Bias Modification for Anxiety Disorders: Application and Conflict[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1588-1598.
[10] LIU Zhe; LIANG Juan; LIU Yanjun; MA Hongyu; LIU Tengfei; MA Lulu; YANG Linchuan. Theoretical Basis and Influential Factors of Leaders’ Adherence to Fairness Rules[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1258-1266.
[11] WANG Ping; PAN Zhihui; ZHANG Lijie; CHEN Xuhai. The Integration of Dynamic Facial and Vocal Emotion and Its Neurophysiological Mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1109-1117.
[12] ZHANG Yongjun; ZHAO Guoxiang. The Influence Mechanism of Ethical Leadership on Employee’s Counterproductive Work Behavior: A Multilevel Perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 926-936.
[13] LIU Yan; GU Chuanhua. Interpersonal Sensitivity: From Social Cognition to Psychological Risk Factor[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 489-495.
[14] LIANG Hongyu; CHEN Shi; XIONG Hongxing; SUN Peizhen; LI Fang; ZHENG Xue. Interpersonal Gratitude: An Important Positive Emotion in Social Life[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 479-488.
[15] HE Zhenhong; ZHANG Dandan; LUO Yuejia. Mood-Congruent Cognitive Bias in Depressed Individuals[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2118-2128.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech