Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (4) : 618-624     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00618
Regular Articles |
Equity Sensitivity of Infants and Young Children Under the Allocation Condition
LIU Wen;ZHU Lin;WEN Guoqi
College of Psychology, Liaoning Normal University, Dalian 116029, China
Download: PDF(155 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Fairness is regarded as the core of morality. Equality sensitivity refers to individual’s stable and individualized response to perceived fairness or unfairness, while it also remains malleable during development. The paper firstly reviews the theoretical concept and research methods of equality sensitivity, with a conclusion that the third party task (i.e. individual as an evaluator of distribution fairness in tasks) is a more positive approach. Then the paper examines the factors influencing equality sensitivity in distribution condition including social situation, social relations, and distribution resources. Finally, the paper calls for future research to operationalize the concept of equality sensitivity and integrate all factors influencing perceptions of fairness under allocation condition.

Keywords fairness      equity sensitivity      young children and infants      allocation condition      third-party tas     
Corresponding Authors: LIU Wen   
Issue Date: 15 April 2014
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
WEN Guoqi
Cite this article:   
LIU Wen,ZHU Lin,WEN Guoqi. Equity Sensitivity of Infants and Young Children Under the Allocation Condition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 618-624.
URL:     OR
[1] GUO Xiuyan, ZHENG Li, CHENG Xuemei, LIU Yingjie, LI Lin.  The cognitive and neural mechanisms of perception of unfairness and related decision-making process[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 903-911.
[2] HE Xing; CUI Liying. Fortune emotions: The analysis for the social comparison & cognitive appraisal process of envy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1485-1495.
[3] XU Fuming; SHI Yanwei; LI Ou; ZHANG Hui; LI Yan. Mechanisms and measures of the public’ sense of income unfairness: Dual viewpoint of reference dependence and loss aversion[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 665-675.
[4] GUO Yongyu; YANG Shenlong; LI Jing; HU Xiaoyong. Social Fairness Researches in Perspectives of Social Class Psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1299-1311.
[5] YU Junxuan; KOU Yu. Paying it Forward: The Effect of Selfishness Transmission[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 1061-1069.
[6] LUO Yi;FENG Chunliang;GU Ruolei;WU Tingting;LUO Yuejia. The Fairness Norm in Social Decision-making: Behavioral and Neuroscience Studies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 300-308.
[7] ZHU Qi-Quan;LONG Li-Rong. Change Fairness: A Critical Review and Its Future Agenda[J]. , 2011, 19(6): 925-932.
[8] WEI Qiu-Jiang;DUAN Jin-Yun;FAN Ting-Wei. A New Perspective of Researching the Relationship Between Employee and Organization: Idiosyncratic Deals[J]. , 2010, 18(10): 1601-1605.
[9] LI Xu;HU Jin-Sheng. Alarm System of the Mental Neural Circuit: A New Perspective on Social Justice’s Study[J]. , 2010, 18(07): 1175-1181.
[10] YU Jing;ZHU Li-Qi. The Development of Children’s Fair Behavior: Evidence from Experimental Games[J]. , 2010, 18(07): 1182-1188.
[11] Zhou Hou;Long Lirong. A Review of Equity Sensitivity Research[J]. , 2007, 15(04): 702-707.
[12] Long Lirong. Review and Comment on Heuristic Fairness Theory[J]. , 2004, 12(03): 447-454.
[13] Li Ye,Long Lirong,Liu Ya. Review Of Organizational Justice Research[J]. , 2003, 11(01): 78-84.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech