Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (3) : 458-473     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00458
Regular Articles |
Authentic Leadership: Conceptualization, Measurement and Nomological Network
WANG Zhen;SONG Meng;SUN Jianmin
(1 Business School, Central University of Finance and Economics, Beijing 100081, China) (2 School of Labor and Human Resources, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China) (3 Department of Psychology, Renmin University of China, Beijing 100872, China)
Download: PDF(415 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    

Due to the chilling examples of ethical scandals and management malfeasance, research has paid more attention to authentic leadership. Based on theoretical and 67 quantitative empirical studies published in last 10 years, this article reviewed the scientific status of authentic leadership. The review indicated that: (1) Either trait/behavioral perspective or process perspective was utilized to conceptualize authentic leadership; (2) Specific measures, coupled with rating sources and methods were developed to assess authentic leadership; (3) Antecedents of authentic leadership consisted of both individual and situational variables; (4) Authentic leadership was found to bring positive outcomes for individuals, teams and organizations through mechanisms of positive organizational behavior, social learning, social identity and social exchange. We concluded with an agenda for future research on the conceptualization, measurement, nomological network, and cross-cultural/indigenous investigation of authentic leadership.

Keywords authentic leadership      authenticity      leadership effectiveness      positive organizational behavior     
Corresponding Authors: SONG Meng   
Issue Date: 15 March 2014
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
SUN Jianmin
Cite this article:   
WANG Zhen,SONG Meng,SUN Jianmin. Authentic Leadership: Conceptualization, Measurement and Nomological Network[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(3): 458-473.
URL:     OR
[1] TAN Le; SONG Heyi; YANG Xiao. The influence mechanism of environmental uncertainty on leadership effectiveness based on cognitive perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1339-1352.
[2] ZHAO Qi; LI Feng. Team leadership and team effectiveness: A multilevel study through the lens of social identity theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1677-1689.
[3] CHEN Pei; YANG Fu; SHI Wei. Servant leadership: Concept, measurements, influencing factors,  and consequences[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 143-157.
[4] WANG Zhen; XU Haoying; DU Chenduo. The Trickle-Down Effect in Leadership Research: A Review and Prospect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 1079-1094.
[5] WANG Biying; GAO Riguang. The Effectiveness of Servant Leadership Behaviors in Chinese Organizational Context: A Longitudinal Research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1532-1542.
[6] WANG Zhen;SUN Jian-Min;ZHAO Yi-Jun. Leadership Effectiveness in the Chinese Context: A Meta-Analysis of Transformational Leadership, Leader-Member Exchange and Abusive Supervision[J]. , 2012, 20(2): 174-190.
[7] ZHANG Shu-Min. The Two-Dimensional Stress Management Model in Positive Organizational Behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(12): 2061-2068.
[8] LIU Qun-Ying; ZHANG Jin-Fu; CHEN Jia. A Brief Introduction of Authenticity Research in Psychology[J]. , 2009, 17(06): 1302-1308.
[9] YU Bo;LIU Xin-Mei. “Opening the Black Box”: The Development and Prospect on the Mediating Variable for the Transformational Leadership[J]. , 2009, 17(01): 158-164.
[10] Zhan Yanzun;Ling Wenquan; Fang Liluo. Authentic Leadership Theory: New Development in the Domain of Leadership Research[J]. , 2006, 14(05): 710-715.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech