Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (2) : 348-356     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00348
Regular Articles |
The Reflection and Construction of Western Theoretical Classification Standard of Psychology
JIANG Yongzhi
(School of Education Sciences; Institute of Ethnic Education, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao 028042, Inner Mongolia, China)
Download: PDF(323 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Contemporary psychology was not only divided in research object, but also on the orientation theory and methodology, so it is difficult to use a kind of logical criteria to classify the various theories. Western psychology often used the classification criteria of theory with time, This classification criteria of theory can help us to handle the development of the theory of sequence, but e are often unable to catch the main characteristics of the theories, due to it difficult to comparison. In recent years, western psychologists put forward on a theoretical classification standard of psychology based on the causality. They think that psychology theory can be divided into organocentrism, envirocentrism, sociocentrism and noncentrism, this classification standard can make us understand the causality between theories, but often easily confused some relevant theories (such as ecological psychology and environmental psychology). This paper proposes a theoretical classification standard of psychology based on the content directivity, including the orientation for consciousness, behavior, mechanisms, and meaning. This theoretical classification standard pay more attention is not the time sequence, also is not causality, but theory content directivity. In causality classification system, the most problems are that the multidirectional attribution and no attribution, due to definition is not clear of causality. This theoretical classification standard can make up for insufficient of other two kinds of classification criteria.

Keywords psychology      Theory      construction      theoretical classification      causality     
Corresponding Authors: JIANG Yongzhi   
Issue Date: 15 February 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
JIANG Yongzhi
Cite this article:   
JIANG Yongzhi. The Reflection and Construction of Western Theoretical Classification Standard of Psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(2): 348-356.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00348     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I2/348
[1] Jing PAN, Huiyuan ZHANG, Donghao CHEN, Hongge XU. Visual search in real world: The role of dynamic and static optical information[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(8): 1219-1231.
[2] Jun-Fang CHEN, Xiao-Ju WU, Rui TAO, Ning ZHAO, Shu LI, Rui ZHENG. Effects of air pollution on individuals’ direct and spillover behaviors[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(8): 1293-1306.
[3] Xin-Yu CHU, Ze-Jun WANG, Huan-Yu XIAO. Dual system theory of physical activity: A reinforcement learning perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(8): 1337-1350.
[4] Xiaomeng YANG, Fuxing WANG, Yanqing WANG, Tingting ZHAO, Chunying GAO, Xiangen HU. Are pupils the window of our mind? Pupil-related application in psychology and pupillometry[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1029-1041.
[5] Jing JIANG, Yanan DONG, Yan LI, Baiyin YANG. More valuable voice: The antecedent mechanisms of employee voice quality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(7): 1093-1107.
[6] Biying WANG, Riguang GAO, Xiajun SHU. Workplace status: The multifaceted characteristics and dynamic influence mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 904-923.
[7] Aimin YAN, Yali LI, Julan XIE, Ying LI. Differential responses of employees to corporate social responsibility: An interpretation based on attribution theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(6): 1004-1014.
[8] Kui YIN, Kaili ZHANG, Lu XING, Jing ZHAO. Impact of ambidextrous leadership on ambidextrous performance: Based on Human Capital Theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(5): 692-710.
[9] Peng GAO, Chunqing LI, Yujie CHU, Ying XIE. The triggering mechanism of short video customer inspiration and its influence on customer engagement[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(5): 731-745.
[10] Jie YANG, Lu ZHANG, Yong HUANG. Cross-level mechanism of playful climate on innovative behaviors in internet companies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 523-534.
[11] Lijuan CHEN, Xiaodong XU. How does literature reading affect readers’ Theory of Mind?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 434-442.
[12] Yanhan ZHU, Guoliang CHEN, Junying XU. Mindfulness in organization: Cognition-oriented dynamic derivative process and interventions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(3): 510-522.
[13] Yina MAO, Ran PAN, Wei ZHANG. Theorizing the interactions among parties involved in workplace ostracism: Based on social balance theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(2): 191-205.
[14] Fang ZHENG, Xiuli SUN, Xiling HAO. The dynamic process and reciprocal effect of employee social capital cross-level fit[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(2): 206-219.
[15] Zhen ZHANG, Chunhui QI, Yang WANG, Hui ZHAO, Xiaoxin WANG, Xiaolei GAO. In-group favoritism or the black sheep effect? Group bias of fairness norm enforcement during economic games[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(2): 329-339.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech