Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (2) : 348-356     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00348
Regular Articles |
The Reflection and Construction of Western Theoretical Classification Standard of Psychology
JIANG Yongzhi
(School of Education Sciences; Institute of Ethnic Education, Inner Mongolia University for Nationalities, Tongliao 028042, Inner Mongolia, China)
Download: PDF(323 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Contemporary psychology was not only divided in research object, but also on the orientation theory and methodology, so it is difficult to use a kind of logical criteria to classify the various theories. Western psychology often used the classification criteria of theory with time, This classification criteria of theory can help us to handle the development of the theory of sequence, but e are often unable to catch the main characteristics of the theories, due to it difficult to comparison. In recent years, western psychologists put forward on a theoretical classification standard of psychology based on the causality. They think that psychology theory can be divided into organocentrism, envirocentrism, sociocentrism and noncentrism, this classification standard can make us understand the causality between theories, but often easily confused some relevant theories (such as ecological psychology and environmental psychology). This paper proposes a theoretical classification standard of psychology based on the content directivity, including the orientation for consciousness, behavior, mechanisms, and meaning. This theoretical classification standard pay more attention is not the time sequence, also is not causality, but theory content directivity. In causality classification system, the most problems are that the multidirectional attribution and no attribution, due to definition is not clear of causality. This theoretical classification standard can make up for insufficient of other two kinds of classification criteria.

Keywords psychology      Theory      construction      theoretical classification      causality     
Corresponding Authors: JIANG Yongzhi   
Issue Date: 15 February 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
JIANG Yongzhi
Cite this article:   
JIANG Yongzhi. The Reflection and Construction of Western Theoretical Classification Standard of Psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(2): 348-356.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00348     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I2/348
[1] WANG Xinjian, ZHANG Huijuan, WU Di, LV Xiaokang.  Cultural influences on individual risk perception: Cultural cognition theory’s explanation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1251-1260.
[2] CHEN Tong, WU Zhen.  Children’s distributive justice: The role of Theory of Mind[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1299-1309.
[3] WANG Fenfen, ZHU Zhuohong.  Relational frame theory: It’s application in children with autism spectrum disorders[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1321-1326.
[4] WEN Peng, REN Xiaoya, CHEN Cheng.  The impact of goal setting on unethical behavior: Boundary conditions and theoretical bases[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1401-1410.
[5] LI Ming-Hui, RAO Li-Lin.  Moral judgment from construal level theory perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1423-1430.
[6] XU Fu-ming, ZHANG Hui, MA Hong-yu, DENG Ying, Shi Yan-wei, LI Ou.  The poverty problem: Based on psychological perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1431-1440.
[7] PENG Luluo, ZHENG Xiaoying, PENG Siqing.  The status quo of culture mixing research and its future directions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1240-1250.
[8] LI Yongshuai, HUANG Zhenwei, TAN Xunyun, LIU Li.  Cultural difference and cultural change in internet data[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1045-1057.
[9] WANG Yan, CHEN Hao.  Meteorological psychology: The psychological and behavioral effects of weather and climate[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1077-1092.
[10] JIANG Qin; LI Hong. ERP research on theory of mind: Perspective from the multiple elements framework[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 778-787.
[11] YANG Xiaoli; LIU Xiaoxiao; BAI Baoyu. The psychological effects of body height and the mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 857-865.
[12] LU Jun; CHEN Hao; YUE Guoan. Tight-loose culture: A new dimension of cross-cultural psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 887-902.
[13] XIANG Peng; GENG Liuna; ZHOU Kexin; CHENG Xiao. Adverse effects and theoretical frameworks of air pollution: An environmental psychology perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 691-700.
[14] GUO Lei; SHANG Pengli; XIA Lingxiang. Advantages and illustrations of application of response time model in psychological and educational testing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 701-712.
[15] Song YAN; Ype H.POORTINGA. Cultural differences in behavior: A few big elephants or an army of ants?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 523-541.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech