Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2014, Vol. 22 Issue (1) : 97-103     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00097
Regular Articles |
A Metacognition Approach to Characteristics of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Model and Intervention
CHAI Xiaoyun;TIAN Yongguo;GONG Shaoying;LIU Ying
(1 Center for Mental Health Education, Hubei University of Automotive Technology, Shiyan 442002, China) (2 Psychological Counseling Center, Henan University of Urban Construction, Pingdingshan 467036, China) (3 Key Laboratory of Adolescent Cyberpsychology and Behavior (CCNU), Ministry of Education; (4 School of Psychology, Central China Normal University and Key Laboratory of Human Development and Mental Health of Hubei Province, Wuhan 430079, China)
Download: PDF(206 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

The metacognitive model of obsessive-compulsive disorder (OCD) emphasizes that metacognitive beliefs are a key factor in OCD pathology. OCD patients have a series of metacognitive problems, such as incorrect metacognitive knowledge beliefs, negative metacognitive experiences and inappropriate use of metacognitive strategies. Metacognitive therapy for OCD has a good treatment efficacy in the individual intervention and group intervention study, with a focus on the importance of thinking processes (such as self-focused attention, perseverative thinking styles of worry, attention strategies of threat monitoring and so on) rather than the content of thoughts. Future research should examine the memory and other metacognitive characteristics for OCD from the perspectives of cognitive neuroscience and replicate and extend metacognitive model of OCD.

Keywords obsessive-compulsive disorder      metacognition      metacognitive therapy      treatment     
Corresponding Authors: GONG Shaoying   
Issue Date: 15 January 2014
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CHAI Xiaoyun
TIAN Yongguo
GONG Shaoying
LIU Ying
Cite this article:   
CHAI Xiaoyun,TIAN Yongguo,GONG Shaoying, et al. A Metacognition Approach to Characteristics of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder, Model and Intervention[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 97-103.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2014.00097     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2014/V22/I1/97
[1] Ziqi ZHANG, Zeyu HE, Wenbo LUO, Haiyan WU. The predictive effect of metacognitive confidence on joint decision making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(4): 604-611.
[2] Jianxin OU, Yin WU, Jinting LIU, Hong LI. Computational psychiatry: A new perspective on research and clinical applications in depression[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2020, 28(1): 111-127.
[3] Haixia QIN, Wenrui ZHAO, Jing YU, Xu LEI. Altered resting-state brain networks in insomnia: Functional connectivities within and between networks[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 289-300.
[4] Mingkun OUYANG, Xiao CAI, Qingfang ZHANG. Cognition or metacognition: The psychological mechanism of tip-of-the-tongue in spoken production[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(12): 2052-2063.
[5] Chunyan LIU, Gongxiang CHEN. Anxiety in individuals with Autism Spectrum Disorders: Mechanism, assessment and treatment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(10): 1713-1725.
[6] ZHOU Shegang, ZHANG Xiaoyuan.  Selecting the best treatment: Client-treatment match[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(2): 294-305.
[7] CHEN Bin-Bin, SHI Zeyi.  Parenting in families with two children[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1172-1181.
[8] PANG Zhuo-Yue, XI Ju-Zhe, ZUO Zhi-Hong.  A knowledge-mapping analysis of U.S. research on treatments for children and adolescents with post-traumatic stress disorder (PTSD)[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1182-1196.
[9] SHE Zhuang, JIANG Guangrong, SUN Qi-wu, SHI Yanwei.  Formal feedback in psychotherapy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1197-1207.
[10] LU Jian; XIAO Zilun; FENG Tinyong. Metacognition: A new perspective on attitude and persuasion study[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 866-877.
[11] YANG Wendeng; ZHANG Xiaoyuan. Common factors vs. specific ingredients in psychotherapy: Controversy and integration[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 253-264.
[12] ZHANG Dongmei; LU Haidong; ZU Yatong. Expertise reversal effect from a cognitive load perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 501-509.
[13] ZHAN Xiaojun; LI Zhicheng; LIANG Xuejiao. Customer Mistreatment: Conceptualization, Measurement and Nomological Network[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 690-701.
[14] ZHANG Dashan; SHI Huiying; LIU Wei; QIU Jiang; FAN Fenghui. The Application of Transcranial Direct Current Stimulation (tDCS) in the Treatment of Depression[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1789-1798.
[15] SUN Ling;WANG Jianping. The New Development of Diagnostic Research of Obsessive-Compulsive Disorder[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(6): 1041-1047.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech