Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (12) : 2196-2203     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.02196
Regular Articles |
Interpretation Bias in Social Anxiety: Research Paradigms, Characteristics and Modification
LI Tao;FENG Fei
(1 School of Public Management, South-Central University for Nationalities; 2 Schoool of Marxism, South-Central University for Nationalities, Wuhan 430074, China)
Download: PDF(224 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Social anxious individuals usually show an important cognitive bias-interpretation bias, which refers to the tendency to interpret social situations in a more negative or threatening way. The present paper firstly introduced the paradigms usually used in this research field: homophone and homograph paradigm, ambiguous vignettes paradigm, reaction time paradigm and word sentence association paradigm. Then it summarized the characteristics of the interpretation bias in social anxiety, and expounded how attentional bias, attachment relationships, developmental experiences and reinforcement sensitivity of personality influenced interpretation bias. Finally, it proposed future directions: (1) the applicability of research paradigms; (2) the specificity of interpretation bias in social anxiety; (3) neurobiological researches of interpretation bias in social anxiety; (4) the different effects of positive and negative interpretations on social anxiety; (5) the effect of interpretation modification in socially anxious participants.

Keywords social anxiety      interpretation bias      attentional bias      modification of interpretation bias     
Corresponding Authors: LI Tao   
Issue Date: 15 December 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Tao
FENG Fei
Cite this article:   
LI Tao,FENG Fei. Interpretation Bias in Social Anxiety: Research Paradigms, Characteristics and Modification[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(12): 2196-2203.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.02196     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I12/2196
[1] Yali ZHANG, Sen LI, Guoliang YU. The relationship between self-esteem and social anxiety: A meta-analysis with Chinese students[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(6): 1005-1018.
[2] Shaorui WANG, Hong CHEN. Why trying to lose weight brings fat? Psychological mechanisms and influencing factors of overeating among restrained eaters[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(2): 322-328.
[3] Li Hua ZHANG, Li MIAO. Hostile interpretation bias and aggression[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(12): 2097-2108.
[4] Jingqi JIANG, Haoyu WANG, Mingyi QIAN. Dynamic attention bias in social anxiety[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2019, 27(11): 1887-1895.
[5] LIU Bingqian, LI Xuebing.  Cognitive bias modification of interpretation for social anxiety: A “bottom-up” intervention?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2018, 26(5): 859-871.
[6] Sun Juncai, Liu Ping.  The advantage of empathy from evidence of visual processing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(suppl.): 7-7.
[7] MA Yuanxiao; RAN Guangming; CHEN Xu. The feature and neural mechanism of attentional bias among individuals with insecure attachment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 392-401.
[8] WANG Qiandong; LI Qinggong; CHEN Kaikai; FU Genyue. Attentional Bias to Untrustworthy Faces: Evidence From Eye Tracking Data[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1508-1513.
[9] LI Songwei; FAN Fumin. Cognitive Bias Modification for Anxiety Disorders: Application and Conflict[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1588-1598.
[10] JING Yaqin; HE Siqi; HE Jinbo; ZHOU Lingling; LI Jing. The Biological Basis of Social Anxiety: Evidence of Physiology, #br# Inheritance and Evolution[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1418-1427.
[11] ZHENG Xinyi; YANG Yanqun; Said Easa. Behavior Performance and Neural Mechanism of Pseudoneglect and Its Transportation Application[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2085-2095.
[12] ZHAO Xin;ZHANG Peng;CHEN Ling. Attentional Bias Training towards Social Anxiety[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(8): 1246-1257.
[13] ZHANG Yu;LUO Yu;ZHAO Shouying;CHEN Wei;LI Hong. Attentional Bias towards Threat: Facilitated Attentional Orienting or Impaired Attentional Disengagement?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(7): 1129-1138.
[14] HE Jinbo;CHEN Changrun;HE Siqi;ZHOU Zongkui. Is There Lower Social Anxiety Level in Online Interaction?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(2): 288-294.
[15] BAI Xuejun;JIA Liping;WANG Jingxin. Emotional Attention Bias Under Inhibition Paradigm[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 785-791.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech