Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (12) : 2091-2102     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.02091
Editor-In-Chief Invited |
Modular Organization of Cognitive Control
LIU Xun;NAN Weizhi;WANG Kai;LI Qi
(1 Institute of Psychology, Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100101, China) (2 University of Chinese Academy of Sciences, Beijing 100049, China)
Download: PDF(403 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  

Cognitive control, the higher cognitive function essential for goal-oriented behavior, is currently a hot topic in cognitive neuroscience research. Researchers have frequently examined various stimulus-response-compatibility (SRC) effects and conflict adaptation (CA) effects to elucidate mechanisms of cognitive control. This article reviewed recent empirical studies utilizing these SRC and CA paradigms. Based on the universal framework of dimensional overlap theory and conflict monitoring theory, we proposed a unique theory on modular organization of cognitive control, in which different types of conflicts are detected by distinct conflict monitoring nodes and then resolved by a common module of executive control.

Keywords cognitive control      stimulus-response-compatible effect      conflict adaptation effect      computational model     
Corresponding Authors: LIU Xun   
Issue Date: 15 December 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LIU Xun
NAN Weizhi
WANG Kai
LI Qi
Cite this article:   
LIU Xun,NAN Weizhi,WANG Kai, et al. Modular Organization of Cognitive Control[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(12): 2091-2102.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.02091     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I12/2091
[1] WANG Qiang; ZHANG Enmao. The Methods and Neural Basis of Reducing Decision-making Impulsivity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 101-109.
[2] LV Xiaokang; WANG Xinjian; FU Xiaoting. Why Poverty Impedes Decision Performance? Three Psychological Explanations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(11): 1823-1828.
[3] XU Lei;TANG Dan-Dan;CHEN An-Tao. The Mechanisms and Influential Factors of the Tradeoff Between Proactive and Reactive Cognitive Control[J]. , 2012, 20(7): 1012-1022.
[4] LIU Pei-Duo;YANG Wen-Jing;TIAN Xia;CHEN An-Tao. An Overview of Current Studies about the Conflict Adaptation Effect[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 532-541.
[5] LU Qin-Qin;DAI Shu-Fen;GU Kai;ZUO Yang-Fan;YU Ping. The Role of Cortical and Subcortical Motor Areas in the Cognitive Control of Movement[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(11): 1794-1802.
[6] JIANG Jun|CHEN An-Tao|ZHANG Wei-Wei|ZHANG Qing-Lin. Cognitive Control Triggered by Unconscious Information and Its Neutral Mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(10): 1573-1584.
[7] TIAN Xue-Hong;YANG Qun;ZHANG De-Xuan;ZHANG Ye. A Theory on the Mechanism Underlying Moral Intuitions[J]. , 2011, 19(10): 1426-1433.
[8] CHEN An-Tao. A Cognitive Neuroscience Study for Artifact Category Learning[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 18-27.
[9] LIAO Cheng-Ju; FENG Zheng-Zhi. Mechanism of Affective and Cognitive-Control Brain Regions in Depression[J]. , 2010, 18(02): 282-287.
[10] ZHAO Jun-Hua;MO Lei. Cognitive Control in Bilingual Lexical Access[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008, 16(06): 874-879.
[11] Ren Yanju;Fu Xiaolan. Review on Graph and Table Processing Theories[J]. , 2006, 14(01): 23-31.
[12] Zhu Xiangru;Liu Chang. A Brief Review of Conflict Monitoring Theory[J]. , 2005, 13(06): 767-773.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech