Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (10) : 1851-1864     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01851
Regular Articles |
Processing Efficiency Theory to Attentional Control Theory: New Perspective for Anxiety-performance Relationship in Sport Psychology
SUN Guoxiao;ZHANG Liwei
(Sport Psychology Section, Dept. of Sports Kinetics, Beijing Sport University, Beijing 100084, China)
Download: PDF(264 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Sport psychology literature extensively reveals that competitive anxiety affects athletic performance (Sarason, 1984). However, the specific mechanisms of such negative relationship occurred between anxiety and performance still need to be further examined. Recently, processing efficiency theory and attentional control theory are further studied for attempting to explain the anxiety-performance relationship specifically in the areas of working memory and executive functions. Based on the research findings (Eysenck & Calvo, 1992), there are two theoretical assumptions for the processing efficiency theory: (1) anxiety impairs processing efficiency more than performance effectiveness, and (2) anxiety impairs the central executive system of working memory. Whereas, attentional control theory is a major development of processing efficiency theory (Eysenck, Derakshan, Santos, & Calvo, 2007). Accordingly, there are also two theoretical assumptions for attentional control theory: (1) anxiety impairs goal-directed attentional system, (2) anxiety impairs efficiency of inhibition and shifting functions. Evidently, processing efficiency theory and attentional control theory both provide the useful frameworks to explain the specific mechanisms of anxiety-performance relationship, which is an imperative topic in sport psychology. Thus, the main purpose of this presentation is twofold: (1) to review the empirical research studies based on these two theories and (2) to recommend the implications for future research. Hopefully, our presentation would promote to further examine other anxiety-performance theories, improve the consistency of research protocol, take the cognitive perspectives into consideration of our research endeavor, and pay more attention to the effect of state anxiety for the purpose of enriching applied research literature.
Keywords anxiety      processing efficiency      attentional control      inhibition      shifting     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Liwei   
Issue Date: 15 October 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
SUN Guoxiao
ZHANG Liwei
Cite this article:   
SUN Guoxiao,ZHANG Liwei. Processing Efficiency Theory to Attentional Control Theory: New Perspective for Anxiety-performance Relationship in Sport Psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1851-1864.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01851     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I10/1851
[1] YAN Ding; WANG Ting; WANG Chengyao; JIAO Can. The influence of drinking on response inhibition and its neural mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 586-598.
[2] Jinfeng Huang; Yifeng Zhou; Caiyuan Liu; Zhongjian Liu; Tzvetomir Tzvetanov. Stronger Lateral Inhibition in the Dysfunctional Visual System of Anisometropic Amblyopia[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 3-3.
[3] Chuyao Yan; Zhiguo Wang. Remapped memory trace generates an inhibitory attentional effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 6-6.
[4] Jianrong Jia; Fang Fang; Huan Luo. Rhythmic sampling of visual objects mediated by inhibitory alpha activity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 11-.
[5] Zhengchun Wang; Shan Yu; Yu Fu; Yifeng Zhou; Tzvetomir Tzvetanov. Aging increases lateral but not local inhibition of orientation processing in primary visual cortex[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 38-.
[6] Weiying Chen; Shenbing Kuang;Tao Zhang. Different aging effects on intra- and inter-areal inhibition in visual motion perception[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 62-.
[7] GU Ruolei; XU Pengfei; XU Rui; SHI Yuanyuan; YANG Ziyan; WANG Yuqi; CAI Huajian. The role played by anxiety in reward learning[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 475-483.
[8] REN Zhihong; LAI Lizu; YU Xianglian; LI Songwei; . Meta-analysis on CBM for anxiety disorder: effect sizes, moderators and mediation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1690-1711.
[9] LI Songwei; FAN Fumin. Cognitive Bias Modification for Anxiety Disorders: Application and Conflict[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1588-1598.
[10] YANG Jiemin; ZHANG Shu; YUAN Jiajin; LIU Guangyuan. The Interactive Regulation of Negative Emotions by #br# Anticipation and Cognitive Strategies[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1312-1323.
[11] JING Yaqin; HE Siqi; HE Jinbo; ZHOU Lingling; LI Jing. The Biological Basis of Social Anxiety: Evidence of Physiology, #br# Inheritance and Evolution[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1418-1427.
[12] ZHAO Xin; LIU Xiaoting; ZAN Xiangyi; ZHOU Aibao. Response Inhibition in Smokers[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(6): 1031-1040.
[13] CHI Yingying; WANG Jiaying; WANG Aijun; ZHANG Ming. The Mechanisms of Preview Benefit in the Perspective of Inhibition of Old Items and Attention Capture by New Items[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(5): 774-783.
[14] GU Ruolei; SHI Yuanyuan; YANG Jing; SHI Jing; CAI Huajian. The Influence of Anxiety on Social Decision Behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(4): 547-553.
[15] ZHAO Xin; CHEN Ling; ZHANG Peng. The Training of Inhibition Control: Content, Effect and Mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(1): 51-60.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech