Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (10) : 1824-1832     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01824
Regular Articles |
Imagining Contact Reduce Intergroup Bias: Theoretical Basis, Practical Demand, Underlying Mechanisms
YU Haitao;YANG Jinhua;ZHANG Yanjun;JIN Shenghua
(1 School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing, 100875, China) (2 Teachers College, Shihezi University, Shihezi, Xinjiang, 832003, China) (3 Teachers College, Beijing Uion University, Beijing, 100875, China)
Download: PDF(228 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Recent studies indicate that simply imagining oneself interacting with an out-group member would reduce intergroup bias and improve intergroup relations. Why does the imagined contact produce positive intergroup outcomes? Mental imagery has been found to elicit emotional and motivational responses as the real experiences (Dadds, Bovbjerg, Redd, & Cutmore, 1997). Moreover, as an important form, the imagined contact can complement more direct forms of contact, although it is not a replacement for direct contact. The effect of imagining contact on bias reduction is mediated by intergroup anxiety, self-disclosure, out-group trust, and the vividness of the imagined scenario, and moderated by group size, group identification, prior contact, and perceptual fluency. We will further discuss the implications of these ?ndings, and provide suggestions for future research (e.g., specifying the processes of imagining contact, focusing on imagining contact of minorities, refining the duration of imagining contact, and integrating it with the intergroup contact theory).
Keywords imagining intergroup contact      theoretical basis      underlying mechanisms      bias      intergroup relationship     
Corresponding Authors: JIN Shenghua   
Issue Date: 15 October 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
YU Haitao
YANG Jinhua
ZHANG Yanjun
JIN Shenghua
Cite this article:   
YU Haitao,YANG Jinhua,ZHANG Yanjun, et al. Imagining Contact Reduce Intergroup Bias: Theoretical Basis, Practical Demand, Underlying Mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(10): 1824-1832.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01824     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I10/1824
[1] SUN Jianmin; WANG Honglei. The potential mechanisms involved in the negative effect of high performance work system[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1091-1106.
[2] HAO Yanan; SONG Bodong; WANG Yan; ZHANG Qin; LANG Yue. The positive bias of dispositional optimism and the evidence of neurophysiology research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 946-957.
[3] LIN Xiaoxiao; LUO Fei; WANG Jingyan. Emotional circuit abnormalities and cognitive affective bias: Neuropsychological mechanisms of pain-depression comorbidity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(5): 725-738.
[4] YANG Zhou; JACKSON Todd; CHEN Hong; HUANG Cheng-zhi; SU Lin; GAO Ting. The attention bias related to fear of pain and its modification[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(4): 547-555.
[5] MA Yuanxiao; RAN Guangming; CHEN Xu. The feature and neural mechanism of attentional bias among individuals with insecure attachment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 392-401.
[6] XU Fuming; LI Ou; DENG Ying; LI Yan; SHI Yanwei. The projection bias in judgment and decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(3): 422-430.
[7] REN Zhihong; LAI Lizu; YU Xianglian; LI Songwei; . Meta-analysis on CBM for anxiety disorder: effect sizes, moderators and mediation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1690-1711.
[8] CHEN Ting; SUN Xiaomin. Shared information bias in group decision-making: Based on hidden profile paradigm[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(1): 132-142.
[9] WANG Qiandong; LI Qinggong; CHEN Kaikai; FU Genyue. Attentional Bias to Untrustworthy Faces: Evidence From Eye Tracking Data[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1508-1513.
[10] FENG Xue; PENG Kaiping. Skill or Style: Two Approaches to Measure Individual Differences on Rational Thinking[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1550-1559.
[11] LI Songwei; FAN Fumin. Cognitive Bias Modification for Anxiety Disorders: Application and Conflict[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1588-1598.
[12] ZHENG Xinyi; YANG Yanqun; Said Easa. Behavior Performance and Neural Mechanism of Pseudoneglect and Its Transportation Application[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2085-2095.
[13] HE Zhenhong; ZHANG Dandan; LUO Yuejia. Mood-Congruent Cognitive Bias in Depressed Individuals[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2118-2128.
[14] JIANG Yan-Ling; YANG Hong-Sheng. Intentions Behind Language: The Linguistic Inter-group Bias[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(12): 2142-2152.
[15] ZHU Yongze; MAO Weibin; WANG Rui. The Neural Mechanism of Negative Bias[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(9): 1393-1403.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech