Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (8) : 1441-1449     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01441
Regular Articles |
The Accuracy of Personality Judgment: The Effects of Trait Properties
CHEN Shaohua;WU Hao;LAI Tinghong
(1 School of Education, Guangzhou University, Guangzhou 510006, China) (2 School of Psychology, South China Normal University, Guangzhou 510631, China)
Download: PDF(255 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  The properties of traits are important moderator variables which influence the accuracy of personality judgment. The previous researches have showed that the higher observability the traits are, the easier be judged, and the higher accuracy and agreement they have. The evaluativeness of traits interfere the accuracy of self-perception. Comparing with the neutral traits, the self-other agreement of evaluativeness traits is lower; Comparing with unambiguous traits, the self-peer inter-judgment agreement is lower in ambiguous traits, and this is reducing with the increasing of traits ambiguous gradually. Furthermore, the properties of traits often interact on the accuracy of personality judgment with other factors, such as acquaintanceship. When examining the effects of traits properties on the personality judgment accuracy, we must take the ecological validity of experimental research into account, as well as integrate it with the matching of trait properties, types and contents of traits, the individual differences, and the cultural differences and so on.
Keywords personality judgment      accuracy      observability      evaluativeness      ambiguity     
Corresponding Authors: CHEN Shaohua   
Issue Date: 15 August 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
CHEN Shaohua
WU Hao
LAI Tinghong
Cite this article:   
CHEN Shaohua,WU Hao,LAI Tinghong. The Accuracy of Personality Judgment: The Effects of Trait Properties[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(8): 1441-1449.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01441     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I8/1441
[1] ZHANG Fenghua; ZHANG Yuting; XIANG Ling; HU Zhujing. The Cognitive and Neural Mechanism of Ambiguity Decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 364-374.
[2] ZHANG Denghao;TENG Fei;PAN Xue. Observer-rating: An Efficient Method in Assessing People’s Personality[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 38-47.
[3] Yueh-Ting Lee;Lee Jussim;Clark R. McCauley. Stereotypes as Categories of Knowledge: Complexity, Validity, Usefulness, and Essence in Perceptions of Group Differences*[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(1): 1-21.
[4] HUANG Fu-Rong;ZHOU Zhi-Jin. Neural Mechanism of Resolving Lexical Ambiguity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(10): 1551-1559.
[5] MAO Xiu-Zhen;XIN Tao. Item Selection Method in Computerized Adaptive Testing[J]. , 2011, 19(10): 1552-1562.
[6] CHEN Qi-Shan;CHANG Rui. Which Factors Constrain the Accuracy of Metacomprehension Monitoring?[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 706-713.
[7] XU Han-Yi, ;MA Jian-Hong. Shared Mental Model: An Approach to Distribution, Hierarchy and Accuracy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008, 16(06): 933-940.
[8] Chen Qishan
. Accuracy of Metacomprehension Monitoring and Delayed-Keyword Effect[J]. , 2007, 15(02): 295-300.
[9] Li Xiaoming, Fu Xiaolan. Decision Behavior in Emotional Tradeoff Difficulties[J]. , 2004, 12(06): 801-801~808.
[10] Chen Gongxiang,Fu Xiaolan. Judgment of Learning and Its Accuracy[J]. , 2004, 12(02): 176-184.
[11] Luo Fengying,Wang Erping. Potential Sources Of Inaccuracy In Job Analysis[J]. , 2003, 11(02): 214-219.
[12] Du Jianzheng. THE PRESENT ORIENTATION OF RESEARCH ON MEMORY[J]. , 2002, 10(02): 127-132.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech