Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (7) : 1317-1330     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01317
Regular Articles |
A Review of Applicant Reactions in Personnel Selection
BIAN Ran;LIN Peijian;CHE Hongsheng
(Beijing Key Lab of Applied Experimental Psychology, School of Psychology, Beijing Normal University, Beijing 100875, China)
Download: PDF(408 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Applicant reactions are the attitudinal or behavioral outcomes resulting from justice perceptions under the selection context. The first recognized theoretical model of applicant reactions comes up with Gilliland’s organizational justice model. After that, heuristic model, updated model and trust model are proposed, leading to a rapid growth in the theory. The measurement of applicant reactions, however, has not been well developed. The major shortfalls include the inconsistency of the measures, the chaos of the measuring structure, and the paucity of reliability and validity research. A few possible directions for future study are propounded in the end of the paper, which are (1) to focus more on the less examined but influential factors in the models, (2) to enrich the cross-cultural research, (3) to shift from the general contexts to the specific ones, and (4) to broaden the research vision by combining the neighboring domains of study.
Keywords applicant reactions      justice perceptions      procedural justice     
Corresponding Authors: LIN Peijian   
Issue Date: 15 July 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
BIAN Ran
LIN Peijian
CHE Hongsheng
Cite this article:   
BIAN Ran,LIN Peijian,CHE Hongsheng. A Review of Applicant Reactions in Personnel Selection[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(7): 1317-1330.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01317     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I7/1317
[1] WU Xuanna. Procedural justice and trust in authority: A mechanism for acceptance of public policy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(8): 1147-1158.
[2] LIANG Juan;MA Hongyu;GAO Ji. The Moderating Effect of Self-Uncertainty on Procedural Justice Effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(3): 530-538.
[3] TIAN Xiao-Ming;DUAN Jin-Yun;Fu Qiang. The Group Engagement Model: Background, Introduction and Future Directions[J]. , 2010, 18(10): 1628-1635.
[4] GAO Ji; MA Hong-Yu. The Mechanism of Procedural Justice and Its Moderator[J]. , 2010, 18(04): 623-629.
[5] Long Lirong,Liu Ya. Review and Comment on Organizational Injustice[J]. , 2004, 12(04): 584-593.
[6] Long Lirong. Review and Comment on Heuristic Fairness Theory[J]. , 2004, 12(03): 447-454.
[7] Lin Xiaowan,Che Hongsheng,Zhang Peng,Wang Lei. Procedural Justice and Its Psychological Dynamics[J]. , 2004, 12(02): 264-272.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech