Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (6) : 1059-1070     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01059
Conceptual Framework |
The Experienced Utility of Well-being and the Deviation Mechanism of Irrational Decision-making
LI Aimei;LU Fanfan
(Management School, Jinan University, Guangzhou 510632, China)
Download: PDF(240 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  From the experienced utility perspective, the subjective well-being includes expected well-being, instant well-being and retrospective well-being. There are extremely important and essential differences among the three forms of experienced utility, which can lead to judgment bias and irrationality. The research project contributes to explore the relationships between experienced utility of well-being and irrational decision making by combining the methods of behavioral science and cognitive neuroscience. The study will be received breakthrough findings by the behavior level, information processing level and neural mechanism level. The research contains three parts: (1)The intrinsic character and behavioral discipline of expected well-being, instant well-being and retrospective well-being; (2)The cognitive mechanisms of bias produced by the three forms of experienced utility. (3)The neural mechanism of the bias induced by experienced utility and irrational decision making. Through a series of studies, we intend to solve three critical issues: (1)In the process of judgment and decision-making, how people are influenced by the expected utility,instant utility and retrospective utility; (2)What is the information processing mechanism and Neural Mechanism of the bias induced by each experienced utility; (3)The discipline of experienced utility bias and inspiration for government public policy. It is not only a contribution to the development of behavior decision theory,but also has much instructive effect on the government administration in order to avoid “index pursuing and real-experience sacrificing”. It enlightens to solve the problem of “Easterlin Paradox”.
Keywords well-being      experienced utility      irrational decision-making      cognitive mechanism      focusing illusion     
Corresponding Authors: LI Aimei   
Issue Date: 15 June 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Aimei
LU Fanfan
Cite this article:   
LI Aimei,LU Fanfan. The Experienced Utility of Well-being and the Deviation Mechanism of Irrational Decision-making[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(6): 1059-1070.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.01059     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I6/1059
[1] FAN Wei, YANG Bo, LIU Juan, FU Xiaolan.  Self-deception: For adjusting individual psychological states[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1349-1359.
[2] YANG Ying, GENG Liuna, XIANG Peng, ZHANG Jing, ZHU Lifang.  Nature connectedness: It’s concept, measurement, function and intervention[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1360-1374.
[3] XU Fu-ming, ZHANG Hui, MA Hong-yu, DENG Ying, Shi Yan-wei, LI Ou.  The poverty problem: Based on psychological perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1431-1440.
[4] YANG Xiaoli; LIU Xiaoxiao; BAI Baoyu. The psychological effects of body height and the mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 857-865.
[5] XU Xiaobo; SUN Chao; WANG Fengyan. Spiritual well-Being: Concept, measurement, related variables and intervention[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 275-289.
[6] LV Xiaokang; WANG Cong. Exposure to Air pollution impairs cognitive function and psychological well-being[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 111-120.
[7] WANG Xiaotian; LI Aimei; WU Weijiong; SUN Hailong; Xiong Guanxing. The effect of work hours on well-being: New exploration of work hours’ heterogeneity[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 180-189.
[8] YANG Qie; CHENG Wei; HE Wenjie; HAN Buxin; YANG Zhaoning. Will searching for meaning bring well-being?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1496-1503.
[9] YANG Yingkai; LIU Yanling. The cognitive neural mechanism of depressive rumination[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(7): 1042-1049.
[10] LI Aimei; SUN Hailong; Xiong Guanxing; WANG Xiaotian; LI Bin. The effect and cognitive mechanism of “time poverty” on intertemporal choice and proactive behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(6): 874-884.
[11] JIN Yuchang; HE Mingcheng; LI Junyi. The relationship between meaning in life and subjective well-being in China: A Meta-analysis[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(12): 1854-1863.
[12] LI Aimei; LI Xin; XIONG Guanxing; SUN Hailong; TAN Lei. The positive effects of defocusing on experienced well-being and its mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(11): 1802-1810.
[13] TAN Fei; LI Aimei; SUN Hailong; HOU Fen. The effect of focusing missing on instant happy experience[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1544-1550.
[14] SONG Hongbo; FU Mingqiu; YANG Shuai. Vitality: A Long Lasting Isuue[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(9): 1668-1678.
[15] LIANG Xiuling; LI Peng; CHEN Qingfei; LEI Yi; LI Hong. The Neural Correlates of Retrieval Practice in Learning and Memory Retention[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(7): 1151-1159.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech