Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (5) : 940-950     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00940
Research Methods |
The Contributing Components Analysis on the Predictive Validity of the Structured Interview
XU Changjiang;LIANG Chongli;LIU Zhengguang
(1 Department of Psychology, Zhejiang Normal University, Jinhua 321004, China) (2 Department of Human Resources, New Oriental Education & Technology Group, Beijing 100080, China)
Download: PDF(215 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  The structured interview which is mainly composed of the situational interview and the behavioral interview, has been widely verified to be effective in predicting employees’ performance, but its construct validity has not been clearly verified. The components of the interview structure, the applicants’ impression management behavior, motivation, cognitive ability and psychological merits have positively contributed for the structured interview in predicting performance. The analysis on the components contributing to the predictive validity of the structured interview helps understanding the construct validity of the constructed interview. The future’s orientations of the research are necessary to concern about whether interpersonal skill is measured by the structured interview, and to estimate the respective ratio of interpersonal skills, motivation and cognitive abilities in the constructs.
Keywords the structured interview      the situational interview      the behavioral interview      predictive validity      construct validity     
Corresponding Authors: XU Changjiang   
Issue Date: 15 May 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
XU Changjiang
LIANG Chongli
LIU Zhengguang
Cite this article:   
XU Changjiang,LIANG Chongli,LIU Zhengguang. The Contributing Components Analysis on the Predictive Validity of the Structured Interview[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 940-950.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00940     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I5/940
[1] QI Ke-Ke;FENG Min;MENG Xiao-Lu;LI Yong-Hui;ZHU Ning;SUI Nan. Social Defeat Paradigm in Tree Shrews as a Depression Model[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(11): 1787-1793.
[2] LIU Xiao-Mei;BIAN Ran;CHE Hong-Sheng;WANG Li-Na;SHAO Yan-Ping. The Validity of Situational Judgment Tests: A Review of Recent Research[J]. , 2011, 19(5): 740-748.
[3] LI Yong-Rui. Debating on the Usability of Personality Inventory Used in Personnel Selection[J]. , 2010, 18(01): 170-176.
[4] TIAN Xiao-Xun;CHE Hong-Sheng. The Commentary of the Research of the Predictive Validity and Construct Validity of Interview[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 870-876.
[5] FENG Ming;REN Hua-Yong. Applications of Nomological Network in Researches Thoughts to Relative Problems[J]. , 2009, 17(04): 877-884.
[6] WANG Yong-Jun;YU Guo-Liang. Validity Generalization: A Review on the Achievements in Meta-analysis of Predictive Validity over 30 Years[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2008, 16(06): 964-972.
[7] Li Zhongquan;Zhang Houcan. Computerized Automatic Item Generation: An Overview[J]. , 2008, 16(02): 348-352.
[8] Wang Zhongjun,Long Lirong. The Construct Validity of Assessment Center[J]. , 2006, 14(03): 426-432.
[9] Tang Suping. Situational Judgment Tests: Procedure, Validity, and Trends[J]. , 2004, 12(01): 119-125.
[10] Li Dezhong, Liu Fenghua (College of Educational Science, Shandong Normal University, Jinan 250014). RELIABILITY COMPARISONS BETWEEN IMPLICIT AND EXPLICIT MEMORY MEASURES[J]. , 2002, 10(03): 280-284.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech