Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (5) : 785-791     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00785
Regular Articles |
Emotional Attention Bias Under Inhibition Paradigm
BAI Xuejun;JIA Liping;WANG Jingxin
(Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin 300074, China)
Download: PDF(233 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Compared with neutral stimuli, emotional stimuli usually results in faster and more attention and presents a cognitive processing priority. In the studies of investigating the relation of attention and emotion, emotional materials are observed to attract attention or occupy attentional resource, thereby cause attention bias. Moderate bias for emotional information is of great value for the individual’s social life. The current study reviews four types of theories about emotional attention bias which refers to components of selective attention account, schema theory, attentional resource theory and the PDP model, emphasizing on the emotional attention bias under inhibitory paradigm separately with the normal individuals and the special ones. Furthermore, we points out the possibility of adopting new technology such as ERPs and fMRI to study the connection between emotion and attention for the different groups of participants in the future.
Keywords emotion      attentional bias      inhibit paradigm     
Corresponding Authors: WANG Jingxin;JIA Liping   
Issue Date: 15 May 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
BAI Xuejun
JIA Liping
WANG Jingxin
Cite this article:   
BAI Xuejun,JIA Liping,WANG Jingxin. Emotional Attention Bias Under Inhibition Paradigm[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 785-791.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00785     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I5/785
[1] ZHANG Xiuping, ZHANG Yuping, YANG Xiaohong, YANG Yufang.  Emotion comprehension in discourse and its cognitive neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1289-1298.
[2] LU Fang.  The precedent correlates of parent-child emotion talk in early childhood[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1162-1171.
[3] YIN Rong, ZHANG Fei-Fei, WANG Yuan-Yuan, XU Zhi-Hong.  Collective guilt: Definition, psychological mechanisms, action tendency and interventions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1058-1068.
[4] ZHANG Yinpu, SHI Wei, LUO Ben Nanfeng, XING Lu, XU Yuan.  Applications of experience sampling method in organizational behavior research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 943-954.
[5] HU Rui; LIANG Zong-bao; ZHANG Guang-zhen; DENG Hui-hua. The perspective of emotional parenting: Relation between parental meta-emotion philosophy and children’s psychosocial adjustment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 599-608.
[6] WANG Zuo-Jun; HOU Yi-Ru; KUANG Yi; TANG Hui-Yi. The amplification effect of group-shared emotion[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 662-671.
[7] ZHANG Shunmin; FENG Tinyong. Neural mechanisms and gene of procrastination based on a behavior-brain-gene perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 393-403.
[8] LIAO Huahua; YAN Aimin. Understanding emotional labor from a contingent perspective: A review on moderating variables and mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 500-510.
[9] WANG Pei; LIU Yonghe; TAN Chenhao; LI Yu; WANG Zixin; BAI Yonghai. Conflict schemas moderate the effects of emotions on interpersonal relations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 331-341.
[10] YIN Rong; ZHANG Feifei; WANG Yuanyuan; WEI Chenming. YIN Rong; ZHANG Feifei; WANG Yuanyuan; WEI Chenming[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 156-168.
[11] MA Jianling; LIU Chang; FU Mingqiu. Neural mechanism of how emotion affects conflict processing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 49-58.
[12] ZHOU Yu; ZHANG Dandan. Emotional and social cognitive auditory processing during infancy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 67-75.
[13] LU Kexin; SHEN Kehan; LI Hong. The role of emotion in terror management theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 76-85.
[14] Cheng Chen; Kaibin Jin; Hongmei Yan. Emotion Cognition Requires Very Little Attention and Varies with the Competing Task[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 56-.
[15] LI Tao; XU Zhenxing; FENG Fei. Children’s social adjustment in intimate partner violence and its intervention[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1448-1456.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech