Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2013, Vol. 21 Issue (2) : 205-210     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00205
Research Reports |
The Moderation Role of the Number of Missed Option in Producing Inaction Inertia
LI Xiaoming;ZHOU Qiao
Department of Psychology, Hunan Normal University, Changsha 410081, China
Download: PDF(163 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Until now, most inaction inertia studies investigated the effect of missing a single prior opportunity on the likelihood to act on the current opportunity. The present experiment aimed at exploring whether the inaction inertia would still appear when individuals had bypassed more than one attractive option and further investigating the role of regret and valuation in producing inaction inertia. The results showed that the number of missed option had moderation effect on inaction inertia: When individuals missed only one option, a relatively large discrepancy in attractiveness between the missed and the current opportunity led to a lower likelihood of taking the second action than a small-discrepancy condition, which demonstrated inaction inertia; when two earlier options were missed, the difference between the missed and the current opportunity had no significant effect on the likelihood of taking the second action, which indicated that inaction inertia disappeared. The mediation analyses showed that the moderation effect was mediated by anticipated regret. The results suggested that anticipated regret could account for the disappearance of inaction inertia when individuals bypassed multiple options.
Keywords inaction inertia effect      experienced regret      anticipated regret      valuation      moderation effect      mediation effect     
Corresponding Authors: LI Xiaoming   
Issue Date: 15 February 2013
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Xiaoming
ZHOU Qiao
Cite this article:   
LI Xiaoming,ZHOU Qiao. The Moderation Role of the Number of Missed Option in Producing Inaction Inertia[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 205-210.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00205     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I2/205
[1] YANG Ziyan; LUO Yu; GU Ruolei; LIU Yunzhi; CAI Huajian. Self-esteem and brain: A social neuroscience approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(5): 788-798.
[2] DUAN Jin-Yun; ZHANG Chen; XU Yue. A meta-analysis of the relationship between demographic characteristics and employee voice behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(10): 1568-1582.
[3] WANG Liangqiu; SUN Tingting; DONG Yan; JIA Yanfei; AN Ran. Road Traffic Violations Study: Based on the Theory of Planned Behavior[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(11): 2009-2019.
[4] LI Bin;XU Fuming;WANG Wei;ZHANG Hui;LUO Hanbing. The Origin of Loss Aversion[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(8): 1319-1327.
[5] FENG Zhuqing;GE Yan. The Undermine Effect of Material Reward to Intrinsic Motivation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(4): 685-692.
[6] ZHANG Hongxia;ZHANG Xuan;CHANG Ju-Hui;JIANG Haitao. How Do Consumers Understand and Evaluate Convergent Products? An Analysis Based on Product Features and Individual Characteristics[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(5): 914-921.
[7] CHEN Yanjun;SHI Wei;YING Hu. The Self-evaluation Bias in Rating One’s Ability: The Dunning-Kruger Effect[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(12): 2204-2213.
[8] LI Guangming;ZHANG Minqiang;ZHANG Wenyi. Application of Generalizability Theory in Personnel Evaluation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(1): 166-174.
[9] LI Xiao-Ming;LI Xiao-Lin. Inaction Inertia: Causes, Conditions and Application[J]. , 2012, 20(4): 584-591.
[10] YUAN Yuan;LIU Chang;SHEN Wang-Bing. Feedback-related Negativity and Social Relation Cognition[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(10): 1593-1603.
[11] LI Shu;BI Yan-Ling;SU Yin;RAO Li-Lin. An Additional Gain Can Make You Feel Bad and An Additional Loss Can Make You Feel Good[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 9-17.
[12] LUO Yu-Yue;SHU Xiao-Bing;SHI Qian. Effort-Reward Imbalance Model: A Review of Empirical Researches in Western Countries[J]. , 2011, 19(1): 107-116.
[13] LI Jian-Bin;NIE Yan-Gang. Reflection and Prospect on Core Self-Evaluations[J]. , 2010, 18(12): 1848-1857.
[14] WANG Ming-Zhong;FAN Cui-Ying;ZHOU Zong-Kui. A Review on the Subjective Group Dynamics Model[J]. , 2010, 18(11): 1789-1799.
[15] WANG Xian-Hui; DUAN Jin-Yun; TIAN Xiao-Ming; KONG Yu. Employee Creativity: Conceptualization, Formation Mechanism and Future Directions[J]. , 2010, 18(05): 760-768.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech