Conditioned Place Paradigm in Pain Research

doi:10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00191

Download: PDF(220 KB)
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks

Abstract In the field of pain, basic research has traditionally focused on the somatosensory dimension of pain and on the mechanisms of acute stimulus-evoked pain. However, less has been done on the affective dimension of pain and on the ongoing spontaneous pain which is more common in clinical settings. This results in the gap between basic research and clinical applications. Conditioned place paradigm, or place conditioning, has been born to a certain extent to solve the problem. It is a classic paradigm to assess the rewarding and addictive properties of drugs. Over the last decade, it begins to be applied in the pain research. This article summarizes the progress of place conditioning in the pain research field, including the employment of conditioned place aversion (CPA) to the emotional dimension of pain, as well as the application of conditioned place preference (CPP) paradigm to the persistent pain study and analgesic drug screening. Finally, on the basis of existing research, we point out the future direction of the conditioned place paradigm in the field of pain.

Keywords conditioned place aversion emotion conditioned place preference spontaneous pain analgesia

Corresponding Authors: LUO Fei

Issue Date: 15 February 2013

	Service

	E-mail this article
	E-mail Alert
	RSS
	Articles by authors

	LUO Fei
	JIANG Zhaocai
	WANG Jinyan

Cite this article:

LUO Fei,JIANG Zhaocai,WANG Jinyan. Conditioned Place Paradigm in Pain Research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 191-198.

URL:

http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2013.00191 OR http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2013/V21/I2/191

[1]	ZHANG Xiuping, ZHANG Yuping, YANG Xiaohong, YANG Yufang. Emotion comprehension in discourse and its cognitive neural mechanism[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(8): 1289-1298.
[2]	LU Fang. The precedent correlates of parent-child emotion talk in early childhood[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(7): 1162-1171.
[3]	ZHANG Yinpu, SHI Wei, LUO Ben Nanfeng, XING Lu, XU Yuan. Applications of experience sampling method in organizational behavior research[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 943-954.
[4]	YIN Rong, ZHANG Fei-Fei, WANG Yuan-Yuan, XU Zhi-Hong. Collective guilt: Definition, psychological mechanisms, action tendency and interventions[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(6): 1058-1068.
[5]	WANG Zuo-Jun; HOU Yi-Ru; KUANG Yi; TANG Hui-Yi. The amplification effect of group-shared emotion[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 662-671.
[6]	HU Rui; LIANG Zong-bao; ZHANG Guang-zhen; DENG Hui-hua. The perspective of emotional parenting: Relation between parental meta-emotion philosophy and children’s psychosocial adjustment[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(4): 599-608.
[7]	ZHANG Shunmin; FENG Tinyong. Neural mechanisms and gene of procrastination based on a behavior-brain-gene perspective[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 393-403.
[8]	LIAO Huahua; YAN Aimin. Understanding emotional labor from a contingent perspective: A review on moderating variables and mechanisms[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(3): 500-510.
[9]	WANG Pei; LIU Yonghe; TAN Chenhao; LI Yu; WANG Zixin; BAI Yonghai. Conflict schemas moderate the effects of emotions on interpersonal relations[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(2): 331-341.
[10]	MA Jianling; LIU Chang; FU Mingqiu. Neural mechanism of how emotion affects conflict processing[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 49-58.
[11]	ZHOU Yu; ZHANG Dandan. Emotional and social cognitive auditory processing during infancy[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 67-75.
[12]	LU Kexin; SHEN Kehan; LI Hong. The role of emotion in terror management theory[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 76-85.
[13]	YIN Rong; ZHANG Feifei; WANG Yuanyuan; WEI Chenming. YIN Rong; ZHANG Feifei; WANG Yuanyuan; WEI Chenming[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2017, 25(1): 156-168.
[14]	Cheng Chen; Kaibin Jin; Hongmei Yan. Emotion Cognition Requires Very Little Attention and Varies with the Competing Task[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(Suppl.): 56-.
[15]	YUAN Yuan; SHEN Wangbing; SHI Chunhua; LIU Chang; LIU Quzhi; LIU Chang. The psychological and neural mechanisms of insight experience[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2016, 24(9): 1329-1338.