Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2012, Vol. 20 Issue (11) : 1749-1754     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01749
Research Reports |
The Cross Modality Asymmetrical Effect of Stimulus-driven Capture in Audiovisual Additional Singleton Search Task
LI Bi-Qin;ZHANG Ming
(1 School of Psychology, Northeast Normal University, Changchun 130024, China) (2 Department of Psychology, Guizhou Normal University, Guiyang 550001, China) (3 Academy of Psychology and Behavior, Tianjin Normal University, Tianjin, 300074, China)
Download: PDF(252 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Two experiments were designed in present study to examine the asymmetrical effect in audiovisual additional singleton search task. Experiment 1 wais a location orientation task, we found that the auditory singleton can capture visual attention when it was in the same spatiality with the target, but visual cues cannot capture auditory attention no matter which spatial side it was. The results suggested that there was a cross-modality effect in stimulus-driven capture; the asymmetrical effect was also existed. In experiment 2, we found that every auditory cue can capture visual attention, but neither of visual cues can capture auditory attention. The present study demonstrated the cross modality asymmetrical effect in audiovisual additional singleton search task. In the same time, the research confirmed that there is a supramodal attention control audiovisual stimulus-driven capture task.
Keywords attention capture      stimulus-driven      audiovisual modality      cross-modality effect      asymmetrical     
Corresponding Authors: ZHANG Ming   
Issue Date: 01 November 2012
Service
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
RSS
Articles by authors
LI Bi-Qin
ZHANG Ming
Cite this article:   
LI Bi-Qin,ZHANG Ming. The Cross Modality Asymmetrical Effect of Stimulus-driven Capture in Audiovisual Additional Singleton Search Task[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(11): 1749-1754.
URL:  
http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01749     OR     http://journal.psych.ac.cn/xlkxjz/EN/Y2012/V20/I11/1749
[1] CHI Yingying; WANG Jiaying; WANG Aijun; ZHANG Ming. The Mechanisms of Preview Benefit in the Perspective of Inhibition of Old Items and Attention Capture by New Items[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(5): 774-783.
[2] FAN Lingxia; Qi Senqing; GUO Renlu; HUAGN Bo; YANG Dong. Toward Understanding the Role of Reward in Attentional Selection[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1573-1584.
[3] LIU Hui-Jun;GAO Lei. The Distinction Between Approach and Avoidance Motivation and Its Implication on Psychopathology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(11): 1803-1811.
[4] Li Hong, Zheng QuanQuan. ERROR MANAGEMENT THEORY: A NEW COGNITIVE BIASES THEORY[J]. , 2002, 10(01): 78-82.
Viewed
Full text


Abstract

Cited

  Shared   
  Discussed   
Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech