Please wait a minute...
Advances in Psychological Science    2012, Vol. 20 Issue (9) : 1426-1447     DOI: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2012.01426
Regular Articles |
Approaches to Research on Resilience
XI Ju-Zhe;ZUO Zhi-Hong;WU Wei
(1 School of Psychology and Cognitive Science, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China) (2 School of Preschool Education and Special Education, East China Normal University, Shanghai 200062, China) (3 Department of Psychology and Center for Research Methods and Data Analysis, University of Kansas, Lawrence, KS 66045-7556, USA)
Download: PDF(686 KB)  
Export: BibTeX | EndNote | Reference Manager | ProCite | RefWorks    
Abstract  Several approaches to resilience research have been developed since the starting of this scientific domain, including person-focused models, variable-focused models, pathway models and an integrated factor-process model. Person-focused models tend to identify resilient people and understand how resilience develops by comparing them to nonresilient ones who are not faring well in the face of adversity and to those who have not experienced any detrimental threats to their development. Variable-focused approaches focus on the relationships among indices of stress/adversity, the influencing factors of resilience and psychosocial functions. The purpose of variable-focused research is to capture the mechanism behind resilience development. Characterized by longitudinal design and analysis, pathway models try to disentangle how human adaptation systems operate and how resilience develops by focusing on change before and after the incidence of traumatic events or disasters. The integrated factor-process approach is on the basis of ecosystem theory. This approach emphasizes both the processes of resilience development and factors related to it. The integrated factor-process approach provides a more generic strategy for investigating resilience and interpreting the results. Each of the research approaches to resilience has its own strength and weakness. Familiarity with these approaches is crucial for a researcher to appropriately design the research, analyze the data and interpret the results, which would highly improve validity and efficiency of researches on resilience.
Keywords Resilience      approach      person-focused models      variable-focused models      pathway models      an integrated factor-process model     
Corresponding Authors: ZUO Zhi-Hong   
Issue Date: 15 September 2012
E-mail this article
E-mail Alert
Articles by authors
XI Ju-Zhe
ZUO Zhi-Hong
WU Wei
Cite this article:   
XI Ju-Zhe,ZUO Zhi-Hong,WU Wei. Approaches to Research on Resilience[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(9): 1426-1447.
URL:     OR
[1] GUO Yafei; JIN Shenghua; WANG Jianping; WU Linhua; AIDI Ma. Changes of Schizophrenia Spectrum Disorder in DSM-5: #br# Dispute between Categorical and Dimensional Approaches[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(8): 1428-1436.
[2] XIA Mu; LI Xueliu; LI Hong;Yang Ke. The Relationship between Left Frontal and Approach Motivation Process[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(5): 815-821.
[3] CHEN Jiyue; XU Jianping; LI Hongyan; FAN Yexin; LU Xiaolan. The Evolution and Comparison of Personality Tests Based on the Five-Factor Approach[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(3): 460-478.
[4] CHEN Li; CHEN Xia; TU Shen; ZHANG Yaru; ZHANG Qinglin. The New Approach to Study Unconscious Emotion[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2015, 23(10): 1701-1710.
[5] WEN Zhonglin;YE Baojuan. Analyses of Mediating Effects: The Development of Methods and Models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(5): 731-745.
[6] LIANG Xi; WANG Zhengyan. Forming of Attachment: The Contribution of Mother and Infant in Protection Situation[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(12): 1911-1923.
[7] LI Xiaoxin; GUO Yongyu; MI Jing; HU Xiaoyong. The Concept and Measurements of Threat Sensitivity: Physiological and Cognitive Approaches[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1608-1615.
[8] FANG Jie; ZHANG Minqiang; GU Honglei; LIANG Dongmei. Moderated Mediation Model Analysis Based on Asymmetric Interval[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(10): 1660-1668.
[9] WANG Xue;CAI Wei;SUN Jiaqing;WU Song;FENG Ziqi;JIN Shenghua. The Theoretical Development and Comparison of Power: From the Perspective of Social Psychology[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2014, 22(1): 139-149.
[10] ZHENG Jian;LIU Li;SHI Jiaxin;ZHAO Xian;HUANG Zhenwei. Compatibility Effect of Approaching the Positive and Avoiding the Negative: Definition, Theories, and Research Paradigm[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(9): 1686-1695.
[11] WANG Xinjian;SHI Mengwei. Coping of the Chinese People: From Emic and Etic Perspectives[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(7): 1239-1247.
[12] BIAN Ran;GAO Qin;CHE Hongsheng. The Construct Validity Puzzle of Assessment Centers: Are We Measuring Dimensions or Exercises?[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(2): 358-371.
[13] CHANG Fengjin;CUI Ruisi;LI Xinwang. Behavioural and Neural Mechanisms of Sign-tracking and Goal-tracking in Animals[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2013, 21(1): 68-76.
[14] ZHANG Xiao-Wen;XUAN Yu-Ming;FU Xiao-Lan. The Effect of Emotional Valences on Approach and Avoidance Responses[J]. , 2012, 20(7): 1023-1030.
[15] ZHANG Jing;TIAN Lu-Mei;ZHANG Wen-Xin. Social Competence: Concepts and Theoretical Models[J]. Advances in Psychological Science, 2012, 20(12): 1991-2000.
Full text



Copyright © Advances in Psychological Science
Support by Beijing Magtech