ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办：中国科学院心理研究所
出版：科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2010, Vol. 18 ›› Issue (10): 1628-1635.

• • 上一篇    下一篇

群体卷入模型: 理论背景、内容介绍与未来展望

田晓明;段锦云;傅强   

  1. 苏州大学心理学系; 教育部人文社科重点研究基地-苏州大学中国特色城镇化研究中心, 苏州 215123
  • 收稿日期:2009-12-25 修回日期:1900-01-01 出版日期:2010-10-15 发布日期:2010-10-15
  • 通讯作者: 段锦云

The Group Engagement Model: Background, Introduction and Future Directions

TIAN Xiao-Ming;DUAN Jin-Yun;Fu Qiang   

  1. Department of Psychology, Soochow University; Key Research Institute of Education Ministry-Center for Chinese Urbanization Studies, Soochow University, Suzhou 215123, China
  • Received:2009-12-25 Revised:1900-01-01 Online:2010-10-15 Published:2010-10-15
  • Contact: DUAN Jin-Yun

PDF (PC)

2130

摘要： 群体卷入模型借鉴社会认同的思想, 在群体价值模型、关系模型的基础上发展而来。该模型认为程序公平通过社会认同影响人的心理和行为, 模型还概括了程序公平的四个成分, 区分了尊敬感和自豪感, 以及资源判断和认同判断对行为卷入的不同影响方式。群体卷入模型的提出为解释群体内行为提供了理论依据, 拓展了社会认同理论的视角; 另一方面, 它也需要考虑个体差异的因素, 在更加复杂的群体情境和更加广泛的文化背景中进一步验证和完善。

关键词: 群体卷入模型, 社会认同, 尊敬感, 自豪感, 程序公平

Abstract: Drawing on the idea of the Social Identity Theory, the group engagement model (GEM) developed both the group value model and the relational model. GEM purported that procedural justice affects people’s mind and behavior through social identity perception. GEM generalized four components of procedural justice, differentiated pride and respect, and told us the different effects on behavioral engagement which brought by resource judgements and identity judgements. Generally, GEM is helpfull to explain the intra-group behavior, it also expands the vision of the Social Identity Theory. However, more researches are needed for further validation and consummation for various person and under different cultures.

Key words: GEM, social identity, respect, pride, procedural justice