ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2018, Vol. 26 ›› Issue (2): 306-318.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2018.00306

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

反生产工作行为:研究视角、内容与设计

 张绿漪1;  黄 庆1;  蒋昀洁1,2;  蒋春燕1   

  1.  (1南京大学商学院, 南京 210093) (2中国传媒大学南广学院, 南京 211172)
  • 收稿日期:2016-12-05 出版日期:2018-02-15 发布日期:2017-12-26
  • 通讯作者: 蒋春燕, E-mail: cyjiang@nju.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:
     国家高新区企业公司创业多层次作用机制研究(编号:71272104)。

 Counterproductive work behavior: Research perspective, content and design

 ZHANG Lvyi1; HUANG Qing1; JIANG Yunjie1,2; JIANG Chunyan1   

  1.  (1 Business School of Nanjing University, Nanjing 210093, China) (2 Communication University of China, Nanjing 211172, China)
  • Received:2016-12-05 Online:2018-02-15 Published:2017-12-26
  • Contact: JIANG Chunyan, E-mail: cyjiang@nju.edu.cn
  • Supported by:
     

摘要:  反生产工作行为是指员工在职场故意损害组织及利益相关者合法权益的行为。研究者基于对管理学和心理学领域13本国际顶级期刊100篇文献的梳理, 从研究视角、研究内容和研究设计三个角度, 对反生产行为相关研究进行了系统的分析和评述。文献回顾结果表明, 反生产工作行为的研究理论视角有特质取向、社会交换、社会认知和挫折−攻击理论, 表现出多视角且跨学科的特点; 研究内容基于情境维度与特质激活理论, 构建了人与情境互动的整合模型, 侧重于对反生产工作行为前因变量和调控方式的探讨; 研究设计多为定量研究, 量表选择具有较高一致性, 整体呈现规范化特点且更多的开始关注方法多样化和测量多元化。最后针对当前研究进行针对性的评价和展望。

关键词:  反生产工作行为, 研究视角, 研究内容, 研究设计

Abstract:  Counterproductive work behavior refers to the intentional damage by employees in the workplace which may impair the legitimate rights and interests of stakeholders as well as the organization. Based on 100 papers from the top 13 international journals in the field of management and psychology, we systematically make a particular review of counterproductive work behavior in terms of research perspective, research content and research design. This review indicates that the research perspective consists of four theories, which are trait-based approach, social exchange theory, social cognitive theory and frustration-aggression model. It has showed a multiple perspective and interdisciplinary trend. Based on a personality trait-based model of job performance, we build an interactive integration model of person and context to discuss dependent variables, moderators and mediators of counterproductive work behavior. The majority researches are quantitative, and the research scales show high consistency. We also find the research design is normative and researchers have paid much attention to multiple methods and measures. Finally, we carry through pertinence evaluation and provide useful expectation for future research.

Key words: counterproductive work behavior, research perspective, research content, research design

中图分类号: