ISSN 1671-3710
CN 11-4766/R
主办:中国科学院心理研究所
出版:科学出版社

心理科学进展 ›› 2017, Vol. 25 ›› Issue (1): 145-155.doi: 10.3724/SP.J.1042.2017.00145

• 研究前沿 • 上一篇    下一篇

组织公平在多层辱虐管理中的角色:基于道德排除理论的多视角分析

严 瑜; 张振嘉   

  1. (武汉大学哲学学院心理学系, 武汉 430072)
  • 收稿日期:2016-02-23 出版日期:2017-01-15 发布日期:2017-01-15
  • 通讯作者: 严瑜, E-mail: yanyu@whu.edu.cn
  • 基金资助:

    湖北省教育科学规划2016年度课题(2016GB002)。

A multiple model of abusive supervision based on moral exclusion theory: The role of organizational justice

YAN Yu; ZHANG Zhenjia   

  1. (Department of Psychology, School of Philosophy, Wuhan University, Wuhan 430072, China)
  • Received:2016-02-23 Online:2017-01-15 Published:2017-01-15
  • Contact: YAN Yu, E-mail: yanyu@whu.edu.cn

摘要:

近年来, 辱虐管理引起了组织行为研究者的重点关注。已有的研究主要在个体层次上分析辱虐管理对于下属的作用机制及消极影响, 但组织层次上的研究还鲜有学者涉及。从领导、受害者和旁观者等多个视角, 基于道德排除理论, 分析梳理了辱虐管理对于组织公平的作用, 整合构建了多层次辱虐管理对下属影响的组织公平作用机制模型, 并分别从组织层次、个体层次以及组织层次对个体层次交互作用的角度, 深入探讨了辱虐管理对下属产生的负面作用。建议未来的研究考虑辱虐管理中的文化因素, 进一步在其他组织公平的维度上研究辱虐管理的作用机制, 改进并完善现有的研究方法, 探索辱虐管理的积极应对策略, 并从工具性的视角关注领导实施辱虐管理的动因。

关键词: 辱虐管理, 道德排除理论, 组织公平, 多视角, 多层次

Abstract:

In recent years, abusive supervision has received increasing attention from organizational behavior researchers. However, previous studies have primarily focused on how abusive supervision negatively affects individuals and the underlying mechanism, with few examining this topic on the organizational level. Based on moral exclusion theory, we illustrated the effect of abusive supervision on organizational justice, and established a conceptual multilevel model explaining the effect of abusive supervision on employees through organizational justice. In addition, we discussed the effects of abusive supervision at both individual and organizational levels, as well as the cross-level effects. Our discussion also integrated leaders’, targets’, and bystanders’ angles. We suggest that future studies explore the role of culture in abusive supervision research, investigate the role of other organizational justice dimensions on the effects of abusive supervision, and improve existing research methods. Further, we encourage researchers to explore positive coping strategies against abusive supervision, and to examine the motives for leaders to engage in abusive supervision.

Key words: abusive supervision, moral exclusion theory, organizational justice, multi-level, multi-perspective